Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
2 more star trails (Original Post) rdking647 Sep 2012 OP
The meteor and the satellite trail are cool! nt Speck Tater Sep 2012 #1
Very cool. How long was your exposure? nt rDigital Sep 2012 #2
first 1 is 200 15 second exposure rdking647 Sep 2012 #3
I am really enjoying these! Callalily Sep 2012 #4
Very good. alfredo Sep 2012 #5
I oughta strap my camera to my telescope with autotrack.... Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2012 #6
Yes they will canonfodder Sep 2012 #7
For something like this I may consider my old Canon AE1,.. Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2012 #8
another disadvantage canonfodder Sep 2012 #9
Sure thing. Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2012 #10
Now you have me wondering if I should lock the iris wide open and shorten the time,... Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2012 #11
Time is the enemy canonfodder Sep 2012 #12
I wonder if it's visible with the naked eye in space. Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2012 #13
 

canonfodder

(208 posts)
7. Yes they will
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 05:22 PM
Sep 2012

A lot depends on the type of scope mount you run and its periodic error.
The lens focal length also has an influence.
Proper balance will also be important as well as a reasonable polar allignment.
It's kind of fun, and never hurts to try.
You might surprise yourself, and everyone here.

 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
8. For something like this I may consider my old Canon AE1,..
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 09:37 PM
Sep 2012

...talk about the old days,...actual FILM that you have to WAIT to see if it came out.

[img][/img]

Advantage: multi-hour exposures.
Disadvantage: Have to go someplace with nearly ZERO light pollution like the road to Vegas.

 

canonfodder

(208 posts)
9. another disadvantage
Tue Sep 11, 2012, 01:27 PM
Sep 2012

Reciprocity failure in low light, long exposures.
Film is bad for that.
Would be fun, anyway.

Take the digital, too.

 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
10. Sure thing.
Tue Sep 11, 2012, 01:51 PM
Sep 2012

Andromeda is easy because it takes up a big chunk of the sky. It's just too faint to see with the naked eye.

[img][/img]

Relative sizes of Andromeda compared to the moon.

 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
11. Now you have me wondering if I should lock the iris wide open and shorten the time,...
Tue Sep 11, 2012, 04:03 PM
Sep 2012

....or lock the f-stop to max and increase exposure time. Focus shouldn't be an issue since it's set for infinity either way. I already assumed I'd need to get at least 800ASA and can correct for any color shift digitally.

 

canonfodder

(208 posts)
12. Time is the enemy
Tue Sep 11, 2012, 05:46 PM
Sep 2012

Full open, back off one stop.

Edit to add.
M32 isn't that hard to spot with the naked eye.
Knowing what to expect, helps.
Under reasonably dark skys, it's just a faint fuzzy patch.
No detail what-so-ever.

 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
13. I wonder if it's visible with the naked eye in space.
Tue Sep 11, 2012, 11:29 PM
Sep 2012

I assume atmospheric scattering has a lot to do with it.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Photography»2 more star trails