Photography
Related: About this forum2 more star trails
the first one inclused a surprise meteor
[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/rdking647/7955018600/][img][/img][/url]
[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/rdking647/7955018600/]stackedImage[/url] by [url=http://www.flickr.com/people/rdking647/]rdking647[/url], on Flickr
the second one is centered ear the north star
[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/rdking647/7955018376/][img][/img][/url]
[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/rdking647/7955018376/]stackedimage2[/url] by [url=http://www.flickr.com/people/rdking647/]rdking647[/url], on Flickr
Speck Tater
(10,618 posts)rDigital
(2,239 posts)rdking647
(5,113 posts)the second 1 is 100 15 sec exposures
Callalily
(14,897 posts)alfredo
(60,077 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Then the stars will stay fixed.
canonfodder
(208 posts)A lot depends on the type of scope mount you run and its periodic error.
The lens focal length also has an influence.
Proper balance will also be important as well as a reasonable polar allignment.
It's kind of fun, and never hurts to try.
You might surprise yourself, and everyone here.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)...talk about the old days,...actual FILM that you have to WAIT to see if it came out.
[img][/img]
Advantage: multi-hour exposures.
Disadvantage: Have to go someplace with nearly ZERO light pollution like the road to Vegas.
canonfodder
(208 posts)Reciprocity failure in low light, long exposures.
Film is bad for that.
Would be fun, anyway.
Take the digital, too.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Andromeda is easy because it takes up a big chunk of the sky. It's just too faint to see with the naked eye.
[img][/img]
Relative sizes of Andromeda compared to the moon.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)....or lock the f-stop to max and increase exposure time. Focus shouldn't be an issue since it's set for infinity either way. I already assumed I'd need to get at least 800ASA and can correct for any color shift digitally.
canonfodder
(208 posts)Full open, back off one stop.
Edit to add.
M32 isn't that hard to spot with the naked eye.
Knowing what to expect, helps.
Under reasonably dark skys, it's just a faint fuzzy patch.
No detail what-so-ever.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)I assume atmospheric scattering has a lot to do with it.