Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TV Chat

Bill USA

(6,436 posts) Tue Aug 14, 2012, 07:14 PM Aug 2012

Judd Hirsch (Numbers) 2 time Tony Award winner - he has a Degree in Physics(!)

Jesus, he could probably actually be doing all the Probability - Game theory analyses on Numbers!

He's one of our great actors. Too bad he can't get anything better than this tv show to do.

this is NOT Judd Hirsch, but as good an actor as he is, I thought everybody would prefer looking at Navi Rawat than Mr. Hirsch.

[div style="float:left;width:200px;"]

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Judd Hirsch (Numbers) 2 time Tony Award winner - he has a Degree in Physics(!) (Original Post) Bill USA Aug 2012 OP

actually I would have preferred a photo of Judd Hirsch eShirl Aug 2012 #1

He was on Taxi. nt Still Blue in PDX Aug 2012 #3

I knew he was a brilliant actor, but I had no idea he was brilliant! Still Blue in PDX Aug 2012 #2

eShirl

(18,491 posts)

1. actually I would have preferred a photo of Judd Hirsch

Reply to Bill USA (Original post)

Wed Aug 15, 2012, 03:36 PM

Aug 2012

so I could see if you're talking about the actor I think you're talking about

seeing a random offtopic photo instead is slightly more annoying than no photo at all

Still Blue in PDX

(1,999 posts)

3. He was on Taxi. nt

Reply to eShirl (Reply #1)

Wed Aug 15, 2012, 09:22 PM

Aug 2012

Still Blue in PDX

(1,999 posts)

2. I knew he was a brilliant actor, but I had no idea he was brilliant!

Reply to Bill USA (Original post)

Wed Aug 15, 2012, 09:22 PM

Aug 2012

Personally, I would have been more intrigued by a photo of David Krumholtz, but that's just me.

Reply to this discussion