Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
Tue Jan 15, 2013, 08:55 PM Jan 2013

California drops to 49th in school spending in annual Ed Week report

Sigh.

http://www.edsource.org/today/2013/california-drops-to-49th-in-school-spending-in-annual-ed-week-report/25379#.UPX3EaHDShb



California tumbled two more spots, to 49th in the nation in per-pupil spending, in Education Week’s latest annual Quality Counts report, released last week. The ranking, which includes Washington, D.C., and the 50 states, covers spending in 2010 and thus doesn’t include the impact of higher taxes that voters approved in passing Proposition 30 in November.

California’s per-student spending of $8,482 was $3,342 – 28 percent – below the national average of $11,824. Only Nevada ($8,419) and Utah ($7,042) spent less. Another Western state, Wyoming – $18,814 per student – led the nation in spending. The gap between California and the nation grew $344 per student in 2010, as California’s per-student spending dropped $185 from the year before as a result of a massive state budget deficit, while spending nationally grew $159. Last year, California ranked 47th out of 51; two years ago, before the impact of the recession, it was 43rd.

Education Week’s often-cited annual ranking factors in regional costs of living. (There are also significant regional cost disparities within California.) By comparison, according to the most recent report by the U.S. Census Bureau, covering 2009-10, California spent $9,375 per student, ranking 35th in the nation and only $1,240 below the national average of $10,615.

California also ranked low – tied for fifth-worst – in another Education Week measure, the percentage of state and local taxable resources spent on K-12 education. California, along with Oregon, Louisiana and Tennessee, spent 2.9 percent, compared with 4.4 percent nationally. Vermont was at the top, spending 5.8 of resources on education; Delaware (2.4 percent) was at the bottom.

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
California drops to 49th in school spending in annual Ed Week report (Original Post) Starry Messenger Jan 2013 OP
Yay California! ellisonz Jan 2013 #1
Having been educated in California pre-Jarvis/Gann Betsy Ross Jan 2013 #2
Thia is what the people of California voted for when they voted for prop 13. marybourg Jan 2013 #3
Not everyone alive now was old enough to vote Starry Messenger Jan 2013 #5
No, of course not, but actions have consequences long into the future and marybourg Jan 2013 #6
I was born in 1970. Starry Messenger Jan 2013 #7
Then you're nearly young enough to be my grand-child and while I certainly don't marybourg Jan 2013 #15
What was the purpose of derailing this thread with Starry Messenger Jan 2013 #16
1) Because I had something to say. 2) I did not derail the thread, I furthered it. marybourg Jan 2013 #19
LOL. Starry Messenger Jan 2013 #20
Your generation? Le Taz Hot Jan 2013 #9
People younger than both of us put it over the top Dude. Starry Messenger Jan 2013 #11
This is why Jerry Brown was against Prop 13 antiquie Jan 2013 #12
I find it hard to believe that people were fooled. No one I knew was. What could they possibly marybourg Jan 2013 #13
I don't know antiquie Jan 2013 #14
Resentment against new people moving in (The shut-the-gate marybourg Jan 2013 #17
I see. antiquie Jan 2013 #18
Well, if more people had voted like you, 2 generations of California children marybourg Jan 2013 #21
And Utah has abnormally large class sizes KamaAina Jan 2013 #4
'Member when Jerry Brown Announced Recently Le Taz Hot Jan 2013 #8
Jerry did not do it. antiquie Jan 2013 #10

Betsy Ross

(3,147 posts)
2. Having been educated in California pre-Jarvis/Gann
Tue Jan 15, 2013, 09:19 PM
Jan 2013

And our schools were the best the country, this just boils my blood. And yet, California ranks best in the country for science ed. Makes you wonder what Wyoming is doing with the money, cause it ain't science.
spelling on edit

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
5. Not everyone alive now was old enough to vote
Tue Jan 15, 2013, 10:51 PM
Jan 2013

for Prop 13. My generation just voted successfully for Prop 30, voted down Prop 32, and elected a Democratic majority to the State Assembly for the first time in decades.

But thanks.

marybourg

(12,634 posts)
6. No, of course not, but actions have consequences long into the future and
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 12:30 AM
Jan 2013

this particular consequence was obvious to all at the time.

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
7. I was born in 1970.
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 01:51 AM
Jan 2013

I *am* the consequences. Anything else useful you'd like to add? Or should we just do nothing and not talk about how to change this shitty state of affairs because you know everything?

marybourg

(12,634 posts)
15. Then you're nearly young enough to be my grand-child and while I certainly don't
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 01:01 PM
Jan 2013

know everything, I certainly know a heck of a lot more than you do, including what it was that people were thinking and saying at a time before you were born and which, as you point out, has consequences for you. Nothing I said should have elicited that abusive reply.

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
16. What was the purpose of derailing this thread with
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 01:07 PM
Jan 2013

the that's what CA deserves for all being Prop 13 supporters snark then? I found that abusive.

marybourg

(12,634 posts)
19. 1) Because I had something to say. 2) I did not derail the thread, I furthered it.
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 01:21 PM
Jan 2013

3) I did not attack you personally as you did me. 4) I did not say "that's what CA deserves for all being Prop 13 supporters". 5) If you want complete control over what is said in a thread you start, you need to write a blog, not make a statement on a discussion board where other people are just as entitled to make statements as you are.

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
20. LOL.
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 01:26 PM
Jan 2013

Well, you'll be thrilled to know that the "people of California" you sweepingly referenced in your opening post now support a split roll reform of Prop 13 by about 58%.

Hope to see you supporting threads about it.

I worked personally along with my local to help pass Prop 30. I do not enjoy being lumped in with Jarvis voters.

Le Taz Hot

(22,271 posts)
9. Your generation?
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 04:29 AM
Jan 2013

All by yourselves? With no significant votes from any other demographic? Dude, that's just awesome.

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
11. People younger than both of us put it over the top Dude.
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 12:17 PM
Jan 2013
http://www.dailycal.org/2012/11/14/passage-of-prop-30-relied-on-young-voters/

Point being, not everyone in CA is a Prop 13 supporter, which I thought would be obvious from the context of the thread.
 

antiquie

(4,299 posts)
12. This is why Jerry Brown was against Prop 13
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 12:23 PM
Jan 2013

and why many of us voted for the alternative proposition. It was actually Jerry Brown who warned us of these consequences to education if 13 passed.

The people were fooled. It was easier back then and it still happens today.

marybourg

(12,634 posts)
13. I find it hard to believe that people were fooled. No one I knew was. What could they possibly
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 12:53 PM
Jan 2013

think would happen when they throttled down the flow of money to the best educational system in the country?

 

antiquie

(4,299 posts)
14. I don't know
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 12:56 PM
Jan 2013

but why else would people have voted for it?
(Unless we had already lost control of the counting?
No, please, don't send me to Creative Speculation, I'll be quiet.)

marybourg

(12,634 posts)
17. Resentment against new people moving in (The shut-the-gate
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 01:11 PM
Jan 2013

behind-me syndrome). The fact that many of the kids in elementary school were not the same shade as their children had been when THEY went to those schools, and didn't speak the same language. A rapidly growing state needed lots of costly new infrastructure and they simply didn't think it would benefit THEM enough to want to strap themselves by paying for it.

 

antiquie

(4,299 posts)
18. I see.
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 01:19 PM
Jan 2013

I am one of those who gets accused of not always voting in her own best interest. My son was in private school at a time when there was no tax credit, so like everyone else, I was paying for public school, and like some, also paying for private school. I opposed 13 because I thought preserving good schools was in the common best interest and therefore mine; it was the way I was raised.

marybourg

(12,634 posts)
21. Well, if more people had voted like you, 2 generations of California children
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 01:26 PM
Jan 2013

would have been in in better condition than they seem to be now ( and this thread may itself be evidence for that assertion, if you're reading up-thread at all).

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
4. And Utah has abnormally large class sizes
Tue Jan 15, 2013, 10:44 PM
Jan 2013

thanks to all those big Mormon families. For whatever reason, the LDS Church has never set up a Catholic-style school system. So naturally per-pupil spending will be low.

To borrow a phrase from Louisiana, "Thank God for Nevada!".

Le Taz Hot

(22,271 posts)
8. 'Member when Jerry Brown Announced Recently
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 04:26 AM
Jan 2013

that our deficit is projected to be gone by the end of the year? This is one of the ways that was achieved -- taking monies away from public schools and colleges.

 

antiquie

(4,299 posts)
10. Jerry did not do it.
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 11:49 AM
Jan 2013

Please explain why you are blaming Jerry Brown. Once again, he has saved the California state budget. The figures in the OP are from 2010. There are many reasons for what happened to our school system, but Gov. Brown is not one of them that I know of.

The governor does recommend adding $125 million to both the state university and the state college system. As part of that, Brown wants colleges and universities to cap the number of classes students can take.

The governor also is recommending an additional $2.7 billion for local schools and community colleges, increasing the total education budget to $56 billion, the Bee reported.

As part of that extra funding, Brown is asking for a financial overhaul of the California school system, according to the Bee.
State Superintendent Tom Torlakson said he believes the governor is on the right track.

“The governor’s budget proposal keeps the promise we made to Californians who supported Proposition 30 and wisely begins to restore some of what our schools have lost. It will take years to bring our education system back to financial health and I applaud the governor for beginning that work in earnest," said Torlakson.

He added, “I admire the governor’s determination to move forward with an overhaul of California’s confusing system of school finance and I share his desire to direct more help to students and schools with the greatest needs. At the same time, I remain concerned about the fragile fiscal state of so many school districts and preserving state priorities. I look forward to examining details of the governor’s proposal and working closely with the education community throughout this challenging process.”
Assemblymember Bob Wieckowski (D-Fremont), who represents the 25th Assembly District, also applauded Brown for some parts of his budget proposal.

“The governor’s budget shows much progress has been made in getting California’s deficits under control. We are increasing our investments in K-12 and higher education and that will benefit our economy and our future workforce," Wieckowski said in a statement. "Just two years ago, we were facing a $25 billion shortfall. Now, although we are not out of the woods yet, our fiscal condition is in much greater shape."

more http://fremont.patch.com/articles/governor-unveils-balanced-budget-44c75f18
Latest Discussions»Region Forums»California»California drops to 49th ...