Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Stargleamer

(2,745 posts)
Wed Apr 15, 2026, 05:07 PM 9 hrs ago

I'm not seeing any advantages to having a jungle primary. . .

in fact, it seems to give Republicans a chance at offices like the governorship whereas without such a primary they had none. Can someone here say what advantages such a primary bring?

It seems the Republicans are savvy enough to run only 2 candidates, whereas our side plays dangerously with vote-splitting, to what end I can't ascertain.

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I'm not seeing any advantages to having a jungle primary. . . (Original Post) Stargleamer 9 hrs ago OP
Jungle primaries would make more sense with ranked choice voting. VMA131Marine 9 hrs ago #1
possibly a money savings so parties dont have to pay for their own primaries nt msongs 9 hrs ago #2
I received my voter information guide today. jls4561 8 hrs ago #3
I was curious so goggled him Lifeafter70 7 hrs ago #4
I googled him also. Apparently he was inspired to change his name in 2013, and has run for mayor of Alameda. jls4561 6 hrs ago #5
How about this!!! nwliberalkiwi 4 hrs ago #6
California Proposition 14, Top-Two Primaries Amendment (June 2010) BootinUp 4 hrs ago #7

VMA131Marine

(5,291 posts)
1. Jungle primaries would make more sense with ranked choice voting.
Wed Apr 15, 2026, 05:23 PM
9 hrs ago

That way you can vote for your first choice without worrying that you’ll allow fringe candidates to advance.

jls4561

(3,194 posts)
3. I received my voter information guide today.
Wed Apr 15, 2026, 06:13 PM
8 hrs ago

The list of people running for governor is two columns, each about eight inches long. Some names are familiar -Porter, Becerra,
Steyer, Yee, Swalwell (printed before he dropped out). I also recognize Hilton and that ballot grabbing sheriff.

Then we have LivingforGodandCountry DeMott (it’s his legal name) and Barack D. Obama Shaw, who has chosen not to make a
candidate statement.

I know nothing about the lieutenant governor candidates.

Being one of those nerds who take voting very seriously, it looks like I have a lot of work to do before ballots are mailed next month.

If I find out anything about Barack D.Obama Shaw, I’ll post it.

Lifeafter70

(1,115 posts)
4. I was curious so goggled him
Wed Apr 15, 2026, 07:06 PM
7 hrs ago

Didn't find much. He is a Reverend, music teacher and owns his own business as a political advisor.
He has no endorsements as of today.



Endorsements for Barack D. Obama Shaw - California Democratic Party Candidate https://bluevoterguide.org/CA/candidate_Barack_D._Obama_Shaw/745272

jls4561

(3,194 posts)
5. I googled him also. Apparently he was inspired to change his name in 2013, and has run for mayor of Alameda.
Wed Apr 15, 2026, 07:33 PM
6 hrs ago

BootinUp

(51,445 posts)
7. California Proposition 14, Top-Two Primaries Amendment (June 2010)
Wed Apr 15, 2026, 10:28 PM
4 hrs ago

Passed with 53.7% Yes votes

https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_14,_Top-Two_Primaries_Amendment_(June_2010)

I was not in the state at the time. I have been told that one effect is lower chance of candidates with fringy platforms getting in the General. I haven't researched it myself.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»California»I'm not seeing any advant...