Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

calimary

(81,222 posts)
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 07:08 PM Nov 2014

Thank GOD!!! Henry Waxman's district remains bright BLUE!!!

WHEW!!!! Out of the bleak results nationwide, at least CA-30 didn't disappoint! Most of California didn't, for that matter.

SO relieved! The Great Mantle of the Great Waxman falls onto the shoulders of Ted Lieu. Very capable young state legislator who my son researched thoroughly when he was studying the primary ballot, and we had something like 27,115 Democrats running for the job. He came in second, in the primary, to the republi-CON elan carr. I was TERRIFIED about this! Even though there was a lot of vote splitting among all the Dems in the primary earlier this year, and that cut into the vote numbers, I was still scared. elan carr was ALL OVER TV with campaign commercials and in the last week, the tone of them got really mean. And the ratio of carr commercials to Ted Lieu commercials seemed to be something like 10-2. It was AWFUL!

Other good news I'm grateful and relieved to report: Sheila Kuehl beat Bobby Shriver for county supervisor district 3. THANK GOD!!!! I don't care if Bobby Shriver's a Dem. I don't care if he's a Kennedy. He never saw a big developer he didn't LUV-LUV-LUV.

He frickin' RUINED Santa Monica. He's been in Santa Monica city government, including serving as mayor, for years. During that time, Santa Monica has gone severely downhill. It used to be a charming, quaint, mellow little seaside community. Now, it's Midtown Manhattan. It is so crowded and congested and overdeveloped that I just don't even bother going down there anymore. I used to spend almost every weekend down there. Nice weather, movies, fun shopping and a large variety of restaurants. There was plenty to do, plenty to see, plenty of options and choices and places to go and to hang out, and great people-watching. Now you can barely move! The streets are still the same size as 30 or 40 years ago but now the overdevelopment all over the downtown area has overwhelmed them. They're poorly marked, there's too much traffic, too many pedestrians, too many cars, too many buses, too many bicyclists, the traffic signals aren't coordinated, it's freakin' NUTS!!!!! It's a MESS!!! And you can't find parking - unless you circle endlessly in these big parking structures that spot the downtown commercial district. And it grew really bad on HIS watch.

Irritatingly enough, we have empty store fronts ALL OVER the Westside. Empty office building suites. "For Lease" signs all over the place. And we've STILL got to build more???? Why can't we make use of the empty ones we already have????? From watching Shriver over the years here, where he was extensively involved in Santa Monica city government, it was clear to me that he was as deeply in bed with as many developers as possible. And when I saw this LA Times write-up about him, sure enough, it confirmed that a majority of his campaign funding came from big real estate interests and big developers. Funny enough, the Times story even mentioned rick caruso by name - a big-ass developer and major donor to Shriver's campaign. rick caruso is the same sleazy asshole who dick cheney came out here to see every so often, to shake down and rub elbows with some big-spenders and high-rollers and other CON-supporters.

SO GLAD Sheila Kuehl beat him - AND them, and quite handily, too. Unfortunately, Sandra Fluke did not prevail over Ben Allen as I personally would have preferred, but he too is a Dem, so that keeps the 26th State Senate district blue as well. And of course, we have the Dynamic Dem Duo, Jerry Brown and Gavin Newsom back in the saddle in Sacramento, too! Plus the Dems kept the Secretary of State job (IMPORTANT!!! THEY'RE THE ONES WHO START THE ACTUAL FUCKING WITH VOTER SUPPRESSION!!!!!!!!), Alex Padilla; for Controller, Democrat Betty Yee over that Ashley bimbo the GOP was pushing; Dem John Chiang for Treasurer; the fetching Dem Kamala Harris remains our Attorney General; Dem Dave Jones for Insurance Commish; Tom Torlakson for Schools Superintendent; and Goodwin Liu was rehired as an associate justice of the State Supreme Court. He should be elevated to an associate justice of the US Supreme Court, frankly. If I were president, I'd nominate him for sure!

So California's governmental infrastructure remains safely blue, THANK GOD!!! So not ALL the news from last night was horrible. Most of it, but not all.

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Thank GOD!!! Henry Waxman's district remains bright BLUE!!! (Original Post) calimary Nov 2014 OP
Goodwin Liu was supposed to have been elevated to the Federal bench KamaAina Nov 2014 #1
Yeah. I know. And he's STILL worth it. calimary Nov 2014 #3
Who says Angelenos are tied to their Carrs? KamaAina Nov 2014 #2
Well, they ARE! But thankfully not to this one! calimary Nov 2014 #4
Voted for Sandra abelenkpe Nov 2014 #5
Yeah. Bummer. But it wasn't a total loss. calimary Nov 2014 #6
maybe he can co sponsor another kill off the postal service bill RedstDem Nov 2014 #7
Funny you mentioned the LA Times recommendations... SoapBox Nov 2014 #8
I agree... SoonerShankle Nov 2014 #9
Charles Munger? Oh man... calimary Nov 2014 #10
 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
1. Goodwin Liu was supposed to have been elevated to the Federal bench
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 07:10 PM
Nov 2014

You'll never guess what happened. The repukes blocked his nomination.

calimary

(81,222 posts)
4. Well, they ARE! But thankfully not to this one!
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 07:21 PM
Nov 2014

SO DAMN GLAD he didn't win. SO DAMN GLAD!!!!! I want to be represented! Only a Democrat can represent me because a CON doesn't like or support anything I believe in. So I won't be represented by any GOP politician, and I won't have a voice, and that is an intolerable situation to me.

abelenkpe

(9,933 posts)
5. Voted for Sandra
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 07:27 PM
Nov 2014

Kinda bummed she didn't win, but glad about the results for our area otherwise.

Shocked over 45 and 46 tho.

calimary

(81,222 posts)
6. Yeah. Bummer. But it wasn't a total loss.
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 08:08 PM
Nov 2014

Props 1 & 2 made it. That was the State Water Quality/Supply/Treatment/Storage one (1), and the "Rainy-Day Fund" one (2) which we sure could use in tough times!!!!! All the more reason to keep voting for a DEMOCRATIC governor, because if you put a myopic cheapskate CON in there, he or she will look at that fund and say - "duh!!! Gummnt baaaaaaad, don't need no money for rainy day, get rid of it, too much big gummnt." Whereupon, GUARANTEED, there will soon follow: a disaster or some really horrible brush fires or mudslides or earthquake or some other unforeseen nightmare for which we will DESPERATELY NEED that rainy-day fund and it won't be there anymore. Instead, the CON will have squandered it by giving us all a buck-98 tax cut. Whoopeeee.

Prop 47 also passed - that allows for misdemeanor classification instead of felony for non-serious and non-violent drug and property offenses. Might help uncrowd our prisons a little. So we got three out of six. Better than nothing.

What we ALL have to do is MAKE SURE that And not just in California, either. The consistent long-range goal MUST be to secure the GOVERNOR slots, AND THE SECRETARY-of-STATE jobs for Democrats. Lock DEMS in there in as many of these as possible. That's the best way to protect against voter suppression. Regardless what the state legislature might do, and what a hopeless case it is, at least the Governor will be on OUR side, and will veto that shit. And you won't have assholes like katherine harris or ken blackwell or that kris kobach jerk in Kansas. AMAZING that both he and brownback survived. AMAZING. And JUST AWFUL!!!!!

SoapBox

(18,791 posts)
8. Funny you mentioned the LA Times recommendations...
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 02:36 AM
Nov 2014

When I was getting ready to do my mail in ballot, I checked their recommendations.

I rarely agreed with them but this go around I REALLY didn't agree with them...it almost made me chuckle, that there were little "code" words here and there, when they were talking about candidates. Code words that made me say, NO WAY! Actually, it was really good of them to do that as I really knew that I would not give them a vote.

Nationally it sucked...so I'm just gonna focus on our wonderful Golden State.

SoonerShankle

(322 posts)
9. I agree...
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 06:06 PM
Nov 2014

..that I wanted Sandra Fluke to win over Ben Allen. And while I too find solace in that he is a dem, I am disgruntled by the fact that he won by accepting independent expenditures of over $1.3M to get out the Republican vote for him and smear Sandra, who ran a real clean money race while promoting campaign finance.

I know Ted Lieu, and I'm so happy that he is going to represent my district in Congress. I wish him much luck in dealing with the gerrymandered majority way back east.

The best part of the day was Tom Torlakson winning re-election over the charter school czar, pro-privatization, anti-teacher Marshall Tuck.

On a sadder note, my democratic assemblyman, Al Muratsuchi, lost by a razor thin margin to David Hadley, who ran the dirtiest of campaigns--and who was buoyed by over $650k from Charles Munger. I've known Al for nearly a decade now, and I'm exceptionally saddened by the ascension of a tool like Hadley to his seat.

calimary

(81,222 posts)
10. Charles Munger? Oh man...
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 08:53 PM
Nov 2014

I once attended a community meeting regarding a proposed mini-mall development on the Westside referred to as the "Munger Project." He was this rich old dude who wanted to leave a "legacy" to the community. Yeah. Great legacy.

What he was pushing was to tear down this beloved legendary old book store where every kid in the area crowded in on Harry Potter nights, and every school kid at all the many schools in the earea filled their reading lists every year, for years. In its place would be developed another large open retail box with boutiques and restaurants and the prerequisite underground parking. Their "environmental impact report" on traffic, which is a HUGE, no - COLOSSAL, no - FUCKING GARGANTUAN problem all over the Westside, assured everyone that the project would generate an estimated four additional car trips per hour. FOUR car trips. Uh-HUH. Pardon the crudeness but - My Ass! So why, then, did they design multiple parking levels and spillways on either side, for arriving or departing cars to wait their turn to drive away or park below? If this was only a mere four car trips per hour? And where were the employees of all said shops and restaurants in the complex to park every day? And how would that affect the adjacent residential neighborhoods who loath the increased local traffic volume as increasing numbers of motorists use their little side streets as short cuts? And if only four car trips of customers per hour were frequenting such a retail complex, wouldn't that classify the place as a failure? That doesn't sound like any kind of draw? Hell, they got more than that every day at the book store.

It was a neat thing to see. The meeting was held in a local library - and the meeting room was jammed! Standing room only! Overflow spilling way out into the hallway and clogging the entryway. Every age group was represented, from local school kids to neighborhood dowagers. EVERYBODY was against it. There were the neighboring residents. There were people with home-made signs saying "Save Our Neighborhood". There was the older woman who sat there and intoned - "there are 42 restaurants in a five-block area around here. WHY do we need more???" There was the pissed-off middle-aged man who lived on the little side street in back of where the planned redevelopment would be, complaining that there'd be so much overflow traffic clogging his little street, parking in every open spot, and the volume of in-and-out cars would overload the side street that his street emptied into, and he'd never be able to get out of his house during business hours. Tons of people. Only a fraction had a chance to speak - there were too many of us.

Eventually, I read in the local paper that Mr. Munger had decided to withdraw the project. Instead, there's a much smaller project going into half as much of the designated property, and the book store, which closed, is now occupied by another local business - and the building the community sought to save is still standing.

But I wouldn't be surprised if ol' Charlie Munger turns up again, with yet another big development project to burnish his "legacy" around here. A legacy of greater congestion, traffic, overcrowding, overdevelopment, rising blood pressure, and overheated tempers. Sounds like a big ol' fabulous "legacy" to me.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»California»Thank GOD!!! Henry Waxman...