Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
After Court Rejects Approval, What's Next For Uinta Basin Railway?
Last edited Tue Aug 29, 2023, 07:04 PM - Edit history (1)
RailNews
A Union Pacific coal train near Kyune, Utah, where the Uinta Basin Railway was expected to connect with the national rail network. The U.S. Court of Appeals rejected the U.S. Surface Transportation Board’s approval of the proposed Uinta Basin Railway earlier this month. Photo by Justin Franz.
After Court Rejects Approval, What’s Next For Uinta Basin Railway?
By Justin Franz
More than a week after a Washington D.C. federal judge rejected the U.S. Surface Transportation Board’s approval of the proposed Uinta Basin Railway — an 85-mile railroad that would stretch into the oil-rich desert of eastern Utah — it’s unclear how its backers will proceed.
The STB approved the project back in 2021. If built, the Uinta Basin Railway would connect Utah’s oil-rich Uinta Basin with the national rail network at Kyune, Utah, on Union Pacific’s Provo Subdivision (the former Denver & Rio Grande Western over Soldier Summit). The effort is being spearheaded by Utah’s Seven County Infrastructure Coalition, Drexel Hamilton Infrastructure Partners and Rio Grande Pacific. It would have been the first major railroad construction project in the U.S. in more than a generation (the last being the Chicago & North Western’s push into Wyoming’s Powder River Basin back in the 1980s).
But the project has been targeted by environmental and community groups worried about the crude oil that would move over the line and then east on the former Rio Grande, through environmentally sensitive places like Glenwood Canyon and the heavily populated Denver area. The Center for Biological Diversity was the lead group in the lawsuit. The non-profit alleged that the STB’s environmental impact statement had been incomplete and did not consider so-called downstream impacts (like the increase in oil train traffic in Colorado). On August 18, the Court of Appeals ruled in the plaintiffs’ favor.
After the ruling, the project’s backers wrote that they “remain committed to the successful planning, construction, and operation of the railway. While we disagree with the D.C. Circuit Court’s recent decision, we respect the authority of the U.S. Court of Appeals. We firmly believe that the railway’s Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) contains an appropriate and thorough analysis of the highlighted concerns, as it stands today.”
However, going back and redoing the EIS could take months or even years. Another option would be to appeal the decision, including the U.S. Supreme Court (the Colorado Sun reports that the backers would have three months to make such a decision). As this story was published, the Uinta Basin Railway had not indicated what it would do.
This article was posted on: August 29, 2023
A Union Pacific coal train near Kyune, Utah, where the Uinta Basin Railway was expected to connect with the national rail network. The U.S. Court of Appeals rejected the U.S. Surface Transportation Board’s approval of the proposed Uinta Basin Railway earlier this month. Photo by Justin Franz.
After Court Rejects Approval, What’s Next For Uinta Basin Railway?
By Justin Franz
More than a week after a Washington D.C. federal judge rejected the U.S. Surface Transportation Board’s approval of the proposed Uinta Basin Railway — an 85-mile railroad that would stretch into the oil-rich desert of eastern Utah — it’s unclear how its backers will proceed.
The STB approved the project back in 2021. If built, the Uinta Basin Railway would connect Utah’s oil-rich Uinta Basin with the national rail network at Kyune, Utah, on Union Pacific’s Provo Subdivision (the former Denver & Rio Grande Western over Soldier Summit). The effort is being spearheaded by Utah’s Seven County Infrastructure Coalition, Drexel Hamilton Infrastructure Partners and Rio Grande Pacific. It would have been the first major railroad construction project in the U.S. in more than a generation (the last being the Chicago & North Western’s push into Wyoming’s Powder River Basin back in the 1980s).
But the project has been targeted by environmental and community groups worried about the crude oil that would move over the line and then east on the former Rio Grande, through environmentally sensitive places like Glenwood Canyon and the heavily populated Denver area. The Center for Biological Diversity was the lead group in the lawsuit. The non-profit alleged that the STB’s environmental impact statement had been incomplete and did not consider so-called downstream impacts (like the increase in oil train traffic in Colorado). On August 18, the Court of Appeals ruled in the plaintiffs’ favor.
After the ruling, the project’s backers wrote that they “remain committed to the successful planning, construction, and operation of the railway. While we disagree with the D.C. Circuit Court’s recent decision, we respect the authority of the U.S. Court of Appeals. We firmly believe that the railway’s Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) contains an appropriate and thorough analysis of the highlighted concerns, as it stands today.”
However, going back and redoing the EIS could take months or even years. Another option would be to appeal the decision, including the U.S. Supreme Court (the Colorado Sun reports that the backers would have three months to make such a decision). As this story was published, the Uinta Basin Railway had not indicated what it would do.
This article was posted on: August 29, 2023
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read
