Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Florida
Related: About this forumGov. Scott’s undisclosed interest – via First Lady – in Zika mosquito control company
By Dan Christensen, FloridaBulldog.org
August 17, 2016 at 5:11 am
Florida Gov. Rick Scott has an undisclosed financial interest in a Zika mosquito control company in which his wife, Florida First Lady Ann Scott, owns a multi-million dollar stake through a private investment firm she co-owns.
The company is Mosquito Control Services LLC of Metairie, LA. According to its web site, MCS is a fully-certified team of mosquito control experts licensed throughout the Gulf Coast, including Louisiana, Georgia, Mississippi, Alabama and Florida.
On June 23, Gov. Scott signed an executive order allocating $26.2 million in state emergency funds for Zika preparedness, including mosquito surveillance and abatement, training for mosquito control technicians and enhanced laboratory capacity.
It is not known whether MCS, whose services include monitoring and aerial spraying, stands to benefit from Florida government funds. Company manager Steven Pavlovich holds an active Florida public health applicator license with the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services through April 2019, but MCS is not a registered state vendor. The Department of Health contracts with two other two mosquito control vendors.
Much more - including shady transfers of Scott's holdings to his wife and other possible conflicts of interest: http://www.floridabulldog.org/2016/08/gov-scotts-undisclosed-interest-in-zika-mosquito-control-company/
August 17, 2016 at 5:11 am
Florida Gov. Rick Scott has an undisclosed financial interest in a Zika mosquito control company in which his wife, Florida First Lady Ann Scott, owns a multi-million dollar stake through a private investment firm she co-owns.
The company is Mosquito Control Services LLC of Metairie, LA. According to its web site, MCS is a fully-certified team of mosquito control experts licensed throughout the Gulf Coast, including Louisiana, Georgia, Mississippi, Alabama and Florida.
On June 23, Gov. Scott signed an executive order allocating $26.2 million in state emergency funds for Zika preparedness, including mosquito surveillance and abatement, training for mosquito control technicians and enhanced laboratory capacity.
It is not known whether MCS, whose services include monitoring and aerial spraying, stands to benefit from Florida government funds. Company manager Steven Pavlovich holds an active Florida public health applicator license with the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services through April 2019, but MCS is not a registered state vendor. The Department of Health contracts with two other two mosquito control vendors.
Much more - including shady transfers of Scott's holdings to his wife and other possible conflicts of interest: http://www.floridabulldog.org/2016/08/gov-scotts-undisclosed-interest-in-zika-mosquito-control-company/
To quote the email that included this link, "This man deserves prison!"
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 2274 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Gov. Scott’s undisclosed interest – via First Lady – in Zika mosquito control company (Original Post)
csziggy
Aug 2016
OP
Didn't Scott's wife also own the urine testing company he demanded for welfare recepients?
stuffmatters
Aug 2016
#1
stuffmatters
(2,574 posts)1. Didn't Scott's wife also own the urine testing company he demanded for welfare recepients?
katmondoo
(6,457 posts)2. They stole from Medicare
Made millions. Quite a pair.
csziggy
(34,136 posts)3. Only after Scott turned it over to her once he was elected!
Gov. Rick Scott, Solantic and conflict of interest: What's the deal?
By Kris Hundley, Times Staff Writer
Friday, April 1, 2011 5:48pm
If you have a $62 million investment, representing the biggest single chunk of your $218 million in wealth, and you put it in a trust under your wife's name, does that mean you're no longer involved in the company? Florida Gov. Rick Scott says it does.
Scott has aggressively pursued policies like testing state workers and welfare recipients for drugs, switching Medicaid patients to private HMOs and shrinking public health clinics. All these changes could benefit that $62 million investment, but Scott sees no legal conflict between his public role and private investments.
And, experts say, under Florida law he is correct.
A few days before he took office in January, Scott moved his shares in Solantic Corp., a chain of 32 urgent care centers, to the Frances Annette Scott Revocable Trust. Scott co-founded Solantic in 2001 and was involved in its operation until last year. His wife's trust now holds enough stock in the private company to control it.
By transferring the Solantic shares to his wife's trust, which is represented on the Solantic board by one of his former business associates, Scott maintains he is free from any possible conflicts.
http://www.tampabay.com/news/business/gov-rick-scott-solantic-and-conflict-of-interest-whats-the-deal/1161158
By Kris Hundley, Times Staff Writer
Friday, April 1, 2011 5:48pm
If you have a $62 million investment, representing the biggest single chunk of your $218 million in wealth, and you put it in a trust under your wife's name, does that mean you're no longer involved in the company? Florida Gov. Rick Scott says it does.
Scott has aggressively pursued policies like testing state workers and welfare recipients for drugs, switching Medicaid patients to private HMOs and shrinking public health clinics. All these changes could benefit that $62 million investment, but Scott sees no legal conflict between his public role and private investments.
And, experts say, under Florida law he is correct.
A few days before he took office in January, Scott moved his shares in Solantic Corp., a chain of 32 urgent care centers, to the Frances Annette Scott Revocable Trust. Scott co-founded Solantic in 2001 and was involved in its operation until last year. His wife's trust now holds enough stock in the private company to control it.
By transferring the Solantic shares to his wife's trust, which is represented on the Solantic board by one of his former business associates, Scott maintains he is free from any possible conflicts.
http://www.tampabay.com/news/business/gov-rick-scott-solantic-and-conflict-of-interest-whats-the-deal/1161158
This first article says that the wife's trust is revocable, therefore NOT a blind trust as the article below claims. Maybe the Scotts changed the nature of the trust before Solantis got its state contract but that still doesn't make it any cleaner.
Rick Scotts Drug Law Isnt Saving Florida Much Money
By Travis Waldron
Aug 24, 2011
<SNIP>
While the state will save little, if any, money on the drug testing racket, Scotts family could stand to gain financially. A former health care executive, Scott founded Solantic Corp., a chain of walk-in health care clinics that provides, among other services, drug tests. Scott maintains that he has no involvement in the company, but he does have $62 million worth of the companys shares contained in a blind trust under his wifes name. Though there is no conflict under Florida law unless the company deals with the governors office directly, the company, and thus Scotts investment, could benefit from the increased traffic from drug tests.
<SNIP>
https://thinkprogress.org/rick-scotts-drug-law-isn-t-saving-florida-much-money-104e05dc4fc0#.o88vdy5z0
By Travis Waldron
Aug 24, 2011
<SNIP>
While the state will save little, if any, money on the drug testing racket, Scotts family could stand to gain financially. A former health care executive, Scott founded Solantic Corp., a chain of walk-in health care clinics that provides, among other services, drug tests. Scott maintains that he has no involvement in the company, but he does have $62 million worth of the companys shares contained in a blind trust under his wifes name. Though there is no conflict under Florida law unless the company deals with the governors office directly, the company, and thus Scotts investment, could benefit from the increased traffic from drug tests.
<SNIP>
https://thinkprogress.org/rick-scotts-drug-law-isn-t-saving-florida-much-money-104e05dc4fc0#.o88vdy5z0
The Sham Of Drug Testing For Benefits: Walker, Scott And Political Pandering
Judy Stone
Feb 17, 2015
<SNIP>
For example, Dr. George Lundberg, former editor of the Journal of the American Medical Association and of Medscape, has decried the cost of such testing, given the absence of evidence to support it. At a cost of ~$45 per drug screen, it would cost ~$5,431,995,000 to screen all 120,711,000 full-time employees. As Dr. Lundberg stated, This is terrific for the laboratory industry and all the attorneys who will argue these cases . . . but should we spend that kind of money? He wrote. In fact, we have not found one proper cost-benefit analysis of this process in the medical literature. Dr. Lundberg, among others, has expressed outrage at chemical McCarthyism.
Conveniently, Rick Scott pushed mandatory drug testingprovided, in part, by his wifes company, Solantic. Scott transferred his $62 million stake in the company to his wife only a few months before mandating drug testing for state employees and welfare recipients. Many companies provide drug testing, including Quest, LabCorps, Roche, and Mobile Diagnostic Testing. There are programs by DATIA and others on how to start your own testing business or become a contractor.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/judystone/2015/02/17/the-sham-of-drug-testing-walker-scott-and-political-pandering/#65beb6423470
Judy Stone
Feb 17, 2015
<SNIP>
For example, Dr. George Lundberg, former editor of the Journal of the American Medical Association and of Medscape, has decried the cost of such testing, given the absence of evidence to support it. At a cost of ~$45 per drug screen, it would cost ~$5,431,995,000 to screen all 120,711,000 full-time employees. As Dr. Lundberg stated, This is terrific for the laboratory industry and all the attorneys who will argue these cases . . . but should we spend that kind of money? He wrote. In fact, we have not found one proper cost-benefit analysis of this process in the medical literature. Dr. Lundberg, among others, has expressed outrage at chemical McCarthyism.
Conveniently, Rick Scott pushed mandatory drug testingprovided, in part, by his wifes company, Solantic. Scott transferred his $62 million stake in the company to his wife only a few months before mandating drug testing for state employees and welfare recipients. Many companies provide drug testing, including Quest, LabCorps, Roche, and Mobile Diagnostic Testing. There are programs by DATIA and others on how to start your own testing business or become a contractor.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/judystone/2015/02/17/the-sham-of-drug-testing-walker-scott-and-political-pandering/#65beb6423470
mitch96
(13,904 posts)4. He wants MILLIONS from the fed's
So he and is wife can steal the money for them selfs...... He spends millions (26 mil I think) for a $130,000 job... to bilk the government like he did with the health care scam... fucker.
m