Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(112,130 posts)
Wed Feb 27, 2019, 05:24 AM Feb 2019

Potential Juror Shouts 'He is guilty!' -- And Judge Jails Him On $10,000 Bail

HONOLULU -- A circuit court judge declared a mistrial in an assault case and jailed a prospective juror who repeatedly exclaimed, “He is guilty! He is guilty!” in the presence of his fellow would-be jurors.

An attorney for the defendant in the assault case identified the disruptive prospective juror on Tuesday afternoon as Jacob Maldonado. A bailiff escorted Maldonado into the courtroom for questioning by a judge.

But Maldonado did not respond when Judge Edward Kubo asked him why he made such a loud outburst that could potentially distort the trial’s fairness, according to court documents.

Court documents show that Kubo was upset that Maldonado’s outburst had “infected” the 44-member jury panel. Kubo then dismissed the entire jury panel “as a result of (Maldonado’s) blatant and willful disturbance,” which “created a taint that prevented the court from commencing trial,” court documents state.

Read more: https://www.civilbeat.org/2019/02/potential-juror-shouts-he-is-guilty-and-judge-jails-him-on-10000-bail/

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Potential Juror Shouts 'He is guilty!' -- And Judge Jails Him On $10,000 Bail (Original Post) TexasTowelie Feb 2019 OP
File this under: Attempt to get out of jury duty goes wrong. nt oasis Feb 2019 #1
I think you nailed it! SkyDaddy7 Feb 2019 #2
Sounds right Kurt V. Feb 2019 #3
Damn. Granny M Feb 2019 #4
In this guy's case, a little subtlety would have gone a long way in oasis Feb 2019 #7
Probably right.. and so stupid. Belief in Jury nullification is much more effective. Amimnoch Feb 2019 #5
During my 30 yr. postal carrier career, I always enjoyed jury duty. oasis Feb 2019 #6
Tears Roy Rolling Feb 2019 #8
LOL, I can most certainly see that! Amimnoch Feb 2019 #10
Me, too. I haven't even been called for jury duty since 1998. 3Hotdogs Feb 2019 #9
My last one was 6 years ago. It was a prostitution solicitation case. Amimnoch Feb 2019 #11

oasis

(49,376 posts)
7. In this guy's case, a little subtlety would have gone a long way in
Wed Feb 27, 2019, 07:35 AM
Feb 2019

keeping his dumbass out of jail.

 

Amimnoch

(4,558 posts)
5. Probably right.. and so stupid. Belief in Jury nullification is much more effective.
Wed Feb 27, 2019, 07:10 AM
Feb 2019

Personally, I consider it a matter of duty and honor to serve faithfully and honestly as a juror when called upon. However, they always get to that one question of “are you willing to decide based on the law as it is written?”, and I’m compelled to disagree with that due to my belief in the right of juror nullifications, and always get bumped from the jury when I do.

Neither lawyers nor judges like having jurors that know about and believe in the right of juror nullification.

Roy Rolling

(6,915 posts)
8. Tears
Wed Feb 27, 2019, 08:15 AM
Feb 2019

This post just got me laughing out loud. Thanks. The mailman comment was worth the price of admission.

 

Amimnoch

(4,558 posts)
10. LOL, I can most certainly see that!
Wed Feb 27, 2019, 09:56 AM
Feb 2019

I would enjoy jury duty, but so far every time I've brought up my belief in juror nullification during the selection portion has bumped me right out of it.

For my particular job it's an inconvenience, but one that I'd be proud to engage in.

3Hotdogs

(12,374 posts)
9. Me, too. I haven't even been called for jury duty since 1998.
Wed Feb 27, 2019, 08:39 AM
Feb 2019

It was a drug case. "Are you willing and able......?"

Me: (At the bench) "I believe in jury nullification which was established by the case of John Peter Zenger. I also believe the prosecution of drug laws is harmful and wasteful." I then went on to state the list of drugs I had "abused."

I haven't heard from the jury commission since. I am now exempt, by age.


I do believe in the jury system and would serve. But I also do not believe in bullshit and their are circumstances under which I would not vote to convict.

 

Amimnoch

(4,558 posts)
11. My last one was 6 years ago. It was a prostitution solicitation case.
Wed Feb 27, 2019, 10:02 AM
Feb 2019

During the jury selection, one of the questions the judge asked was "how many here feel that prostitution should be legalized." with a fair number of the jury raising their hands. He then followed up with the question "Those that feel it should be legal, are you willing to commit to adhering to the law as it's written when formulating your decision? Please raise your hand if you are not willing to base your decision on the law as it's written."..

That's when I raised my hand and notified him in my belief in the right of juror nullification.
He silenced me mid-sentence.
My comments caused a lot of stirring and side conversations in the jury pool.
Multiple jurors were asking "are we allowed to do that?"
The judge called up the prosecution and defense, had about a 10 minute side discussion.
Dismissed the case and dismissed the jury.

I haven't been called back since.
Note, although I do use quotes up above, it is paraphrased as I didn't transcribe exactly what was said, but it's really close to the actual discussion.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Hawaii»Potential Juror Shouts 'H...