Minnesota

question everything

(47,460 posts) Fri Mar 4, 2016, 04:20 PM Mar 2016

It's Broke! - Sack Cartoon

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

It's Broke! - Sack Cartoon (Original Post) question everything Mar 2016 OP

LOL! MADem Mar 2016 #1

What about resolutions? Randomthought Mar 2016 #2

Right. And we stayed to the end and debated resolution question everything Mar 2016 #3

we have a primary Randomthought Mar 2016 #4

No. Caucuses are run and paid for by the parties question everything Mar 2016 #5

Nobody will show at all if we take the candidates out of caucusing dflprincess Mar 2016 #6

MADem

(135,425 posts)

1. LOL!

Reply to question everything (Original post)

Fri Mar 4, 2016, 04:27 PM

Mar 2016

Caucuses used to be cute back in the day when the farmers had nothing to do in the colder months, save tend the animals and wait for spring, but nowadays people work at night, they can't find someone to mind the children, they can't get a ride to the caucus site, it's just a DRILL, a TIME-WASTER, a pain in the ass. Easier to show up, vote, go home.

MN isn't the only state laboring under this dumb system--Iowa LOVES it because it brings in billions every four years, but it really is ... dumb. And disenfranchising. The working stiffs, the single moms, the people who can't afford the gas in the car--all the people who need government most are shut out of the system.

I'm not a fan!

Randomthought

(835 posts)

2. What about resolutions?

Reply to MADem (Reply #1)

Sat Mar 5, 2016, 10:19 AM

Mar 2016

More goes on at a caucus than voting. Resolution are the best part of caucusing.

question everything

(47,460 posts)

3. Right. And we stayed to the end and debated resolution

Reply to Randomthought (Reply #2)

Sat Mar 5, 2016, 04:14 PM

Mar 2016

But most people left as soon as they cast their votes.

So keep the caucuses for the resolutions and have a primary for the actual votes.

Once people cast their votes, all of a sudden there were seats for everyone.

Randomthought

(835 posts)

4. we have a primary

Reply to question everything (Reply #3)

Sat Mar 5, 2016, 08:06 PM

Mar 2016

In Sept I think, so what do you propose? Go to the expense of two primaries?

question everything

(47,460 posts)

5. No. Caucuses are run and paid for by the parties

Reply to Randomthought (Reply #4)

Sat Mar 5, 2016, 08:21 PM

Mar 2016

Let them have it for people to... well, caucus.

Primaries are run by the state. The current one in August is a joke. Once the candidates declare they they would "abide" by the conventions, there are no more than one candidate per party per office. Though I did vote for Franken in the first year because there was someone who was challenging him.

Remove the August primary and replace it with a real one in March.

dflprincess

(28,075 posts)

6. Nobody will show at all if we take the candidates out of caucusing

Reply to question everything (Reply #3)

Sat Mar 5, 2016, 11:17 PM

Mar 2016

I'm not sure I'd show up and I've made it to every caucus since McGovern ran. 2008 and 2016 had incredible turnout - more than I've seen since the '70s but they were aberrations. Most years we've wrapped things up by 8 and very few people bother to show up.

I imagine 2018 will be pretty quiet unless the governor's race has some contention (and if we're really lucky and someone challenges Klobuchar). Besides, candidates can always take it to a primary they way Dayton did.

Discussing resolutions is interesting, but I sometimes wonder if any of our elected officials pay any attention to the platform at all.

Reply to this discussion