Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(112,150 posts)
Sun Jul 9, 2017, 02:31 PM Jul 2017

Historic New Hampshire bridge demolished for safety reasons


The 108-year-old Lilac Bridge in Hooksett was demolished Friday for safety reasons. The bridge over the Merrimack River was closed to traffic in 1976 but remained open to pedestrian traffic until this June. Town officials then told people to stay away from the area, particularly in the water underneath it, out of concerns that the bridge might collapse. Courtesy of Jeff Roche


A historic bridge in Hooksett has been demolished for safety reasons.

The 108-year-old Lilac Bridge on the Merrimack River was closed to traffic in 1976 but remained open to pedestrian traffic until this June. Town officials then told people to stay away from the area, particularly in the water underneath it, out of concerns that the bridge might collapse.

The bridge was listed on the New Hampshire State Register of Historic Places. It was demolished on Friday afternoon.

The section of river will be closed until July 12.

http://www.concordmonitor.com/Historic-New-Hampshire-bridge-demolished-for-safety-reasons-11175698
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Historic New Hampshire bridge demolished for safety reasons (Original Post) TexasTowelie Jul 2017 OP
Whenever I see the words "for safety reasons", I translate the phrase to mean no_hypocrisy Jul 2017 #1
a similar bridge over the WI? river, tho it could have been a different river was replaced in WI. pansypoo53219 Jul 2017 #2

no_hypocrisy

(46,088 posts)
1. Whenever I see the words "for safety reasons", I translate the phrase to mean
Sun Jul 9, 2017, 02:46 PM
Jul 2017

"for purposes of preventative liability". In other words, the insurance carrier for the property inspected the bridge and decided it was a potential/probable future claim.

pansypoo53219

(20,975 posts)
2. a similar bridge over the WI? river, tho it could have been a different river was replaced in WI.
Sun Jul 9, 2017, 03:10 PM
Jul 2017

i took some good pics tho. made it wider + open for semi's i guess. WI one shorter. heavier beams at the top.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»New Hampshire»Historic New Hampshire br...