Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,405 posts)
Sat Jul 17, 2021, 07:35 AM Jul 2021

N.J. woman must remove anti-Biden F-bomb signs or face $250-a-day fines, judge rules

Last edited Sat Jul 17, 2021, 09:46 AM - Edit history (1)

Hat tip, Popehat

Yeah that doesn’t sound right, plus the judge is invoking like three speech tropes



This goes back to Thursday, so it's not LBN.

Union

N.J. woman must remove anti-Biden F-bomb signs or face $250-a-day fines, judge rules

Updated Jul 17, 2021; Posted Jul 16, 2021

By Rebecca Panico | NJ Advance Media for NJ.com

Editor’s note: This story contains a photo that features profanity.

A municipal judge on Thursday ruled that a Roselle Park homeowner’s owner’s anti- President Biden flags including the F-bomb on her fence were obscene and must be removed because they violated a borough ordinance.

Roselle Park Municipal Court Judge Gary Bundy ordered the Willow Avenue homeowner to remove the signs with profanity within a week or face a $250-a-day fine. Patricia Dilascio is the property owner but her daughter, Andrea Dick, had the signs, three of which include the F-word, on display.

“This is not a case about politics. It is a case, pure and simple, about language,” Bundy said. “This ordinance does not restrict political speech. Neither this town or its laws may abridge or eliminate Ms. Dilascio’s freedom of speech. However, freedom of speech is not simply an absolute right. It is clear from state law and statutes that we cannot simply put up the umbrella of the First Amendment and say everything and anything is protected speech.”

{snip}

Roselle Park Mayor Joseph Signorello III, a Democrat who is running for state Senate in Union County, previously said the home is close to a school and angered some residents. But Dick repeatedly said she would not remove the signs since they are political speech protected by the First Amendment.

{snip}

The homeowner has 20 days to appeal the decision to Superior Court. Campagna did not respond to a request for comment and a man who answered the door at the property Friday morning said “she’s not home.”

The three signs with the f-word and others remained up Friday morning.

Local journalism needs your support. Subscribe at nj.com/supporter.

Rebecca Panico may be reached at rpanico@njadvancemedia.com.

Andrea Dick is right. The signs are political speech protected by the First Amendment.

Go ahead and alert. Then give this some thought:



Source: https://blog.library.gsu.edu/2012/03/23/secularists-descend-upon-d-c-for-reason-rally/

Fri Jan 25, 2019: Johns Hopkins to buy Newseum building in D.C. as journalism museum plans to relocate

{edited to add this full disclosure:} IANAL
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
N.J. woman must remove anti-Biden F-bomb signs or face $250-a-day fines, judge rules (Original Post) mahatmakanejeeves Jul 2021 OP
Perfect name for her daughter: Mrs. Dick. CurtEastPoint Jul 2021 #1
Here's the earlier thread in LBN about this issue: mahatmakanejeeves Jul 2021 #2
I agree with Bundy. madaboutharry Jul 2021 #3
I tried to post the picture, but it's in one of those formats that wouldn't show up at DU. mahatmakanejeeves Jul 2021 #4
here CurtEastPoint Jul 2021 #6
Thanks. Just what I need at 8:00 on a Saturday morning. mahatmakanejeeves Jul 2021 #9
AND she's in a school zone. I know it's 2021 but kids don't need to see that. CurtEastPoint Jul 2021 #7
The First Amendment doesn't protect "fighting" words. "Absolute free speechers" aren't ... marble falls Jul 2021 #5
If you are on Facebook, take a look at her vitriol. Hate filled, illiterate crap. CurtEastPoint Jul 2021 #8
From the thread at Popehat: mahatmakanejeeves Jul 2021 #10
Yuppers. If he wants to be reappointed, guess which way he has to rule. Then the taxpayers pay to 3Hotdogs Jul 2021 #11

madaboutharry

(40,208 posts)
3. I agree with Bundy.
Sat Jul 17, 2021, 07:50 AM
Jul 2021
The ordinance prohibits displaying “any obscene material, communication or performance or other article or item which is obscene within the Borough.” It defines obscenity as material that depicts or describes sexual conduct or lacks any serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value.


Her signs, which can be seen at the link, are not in any way serious. Their only value is broadcasting to the world how she possesses no class whatsoever.

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,405 posts)
4. I tried to post the picture, but it's in one of those formats that wouldn't show up at DU.
Sat Jul 17, 2021, 07:52 AM
Jul 2021

You can kinda guess what they say.

Thank you for writing.

And good morning.

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,405 posts)
9. Thanks. Just what I need at 8:00 on a Saturday morning.
Sat Jul 17, 2021, 08:01 AM
Jul 2021

And good morning. We're already off to a great start.

marble falls

(57,077 posts)
5. The First Amendment doesn't protect "fighting" words. "Absolute free speechers" aren't ...
Sat Jul 17, 2021, 07:57 AM
Jul 2021

... following the Constitution, either.

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,405 posts)
10. From the thread at Popehat:
Sat Jul 17, 2021, 08:12 AM
Jul 2021
Lawyersplaining Jersey Justice. Municipal judges are appointed by the municipality and are part time. They preside over traffic court and misdemeanors. The appointment is a 3 year term. Not surprised a municipal judge upheld an unconstitutional as applied ordinance .


3Hotdogs

(12,374 posts)
11. Yuppers. If he wants to be reappointed, guess which way he has to rule. Then the taxpayers pay to
Sat Jul 17, 2021, 01:41 PM
Jul 2021

defend his ruling in superior court or higher.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»New Jersey»N.J. woman must remove an...