Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(112,164 posts)
Mon Oct 3, 2016, 06:39 AM Oct 2016

Why wasn't New Jersey's Christie charged in 'Bridgegate'?

TRENTON, N.J. (AP) - It was seven days into the trial in the George Washington Bridge lane-closing case when the government's key witness dropped the bombshell: Gov. Chris Christie, he said, was told about the traffic jams while they were going on.

Christie, David Wildstein told the jury last week, responded with a laugh and a joke about the role politics played. The accusation blared in headlines across the country and immediately raised one question: Why wasn't the Republican governor charged?

First off, the governor denies he did anything wrong or that he knew about the political revenge plot, often dubbed "Bridgegate," that Wildstein says was tied to his 2013 re-election campaign.

Then there's Wildstein's testimony, in which he never says that Christie was directly told about the plot. Wildstein said that defendant Bill Baroni told the governor about the traffic jams and that the mayor wasn't happy that he wasn't getting his calls returned. Wildstein testified Baroni told the governor that Wildstein was monitoring the situation and the governor made what he took as a sarcastic joke regarding the "Wally Edge" pseudonym that Wildstein blogged under.

Read more: http://www.philly.com/philly/news/politics/20161002_ap_622d46e6983b45b4938beb968ce8434f.html

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why wasn't New Jersey's Christie charged in 'Bridgegate'? (Original Post) TexasTowelie Oct 2016 OP
"Unindicted co-conspirator". longship Oct 2016 #1
"It ain't over til it's over" ? apcalc Oct 2016 #2
LOCK HIM UP Angry Dragon Oct 2016 #3
And keep in mind that Christie used to be the kind of prosecutor who is prosecuting him. rocktivity Oct 2016 #4

longship

(40,416 posts)
1. "Unindicted co-conspirator".
Mon Oct 3, 2016, 06:48 AM
Oct 2016

There's no way he did not know. There's little doubt that he may have actually initiated it.

It is what Chrispy-Creme is about.

rocktivity

(44,576 posts)
4. And keep in mind that Christie used to be the kind of prosecutor who is prosecuting him.
Fri Oct 7, 2016, 04:16 PM
Oct 2016

Paul Fishman And His Fabulous Feds deliberately avoided indicting Christie on being in on the conspiracy to strengthen their case against him being in on the coverup:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6622303

Patience. And all is revealed in the DU Christie Crime Digest:
Vol. 1 | Vol. 2 | Vol. 3 |Vol.4


rocktivity

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»New Jersey»Why wasn't New Jersey's C...