Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JPZenger

(6,819 posts)
Mon Mar 18, 2013, 09:02 AM Mar 2013

Update on PA. Rejection of Food Stamps for Households With More than $5,500 of Assets

PA. is one of the few states that now requires an analysis of assets owned by a household before they can receive food stamps. Some asset test may make sense to avoid extreme cases, but PA. now refuses food stamps for households with only $5500 in assets, except it is $9000 for those 60 or older or the disabled. There are a few exceptions in what is counted as assets, but money set aside to pay future college tuition, medical bills or home repairs do count.

http://www.philly.com/philly/news/20130318_Corbett_s_cuts_SNAP_program.html

Excerpts:

"So roughly one-half of 1 percent of SNAP spending here is cut, but state administrative costs likely increased to make federal funding decrease.

"What it means is Pennsylvania is going without federal dollars that come into the state to feed needy people. It's not as though they went away. It shifts costs to family and local social services," says Ellen Vollinger, legal director for the Food Research and Action Center, a national nonprofit working to fight hunger. She and others say the test mostly punishes older or disabled recipients with some savings for medical needs.

And Julie Zaebst, of the Greater Philadelphia Coalition Against Hunger, argues the efficiency question: "Every single person needs to document assets even if they have just $100 in a bank account, adding an enormous amount of paperwork for caseworkers to weed out a small percentage of people. . . . Is that efficient? It just doesn't seem a good use of already overburdened caseworkers' time."


5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Update on PA. Rejection of Food Stamps for Households With More than $5,500 of Assets (Original Post) JPZenger Mar 2013 OP
are there any Democrats in Pennsylvania that can do something about this? still_one Mar 2013 #1
Not really, PRETZEL Mar 2013 #3
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! Ednahilda Mar 2013 #4
"It just doesn't seem a good use of already overburdened caseworkers' time."? Sure it does! Walk away Mar 2013 #2
I think it is 2,000 here in California, and has been for many years. not 100% sure. robinlynne Mar 2013 #5

Walk away

(9,494 posts)
2. "It just doesn't seem a good use of already overburdened caseworkers' time."? Sure it does!
Mon Mar 18, 2013, 09:36 AM
Mar 2013

If your object is to punish the poor and even towns that allow the poor and ill to live there. This hatred of the poor is unbelievable.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Pennsylvania»Update on PA. Rejection o...