Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Texas
Related: About this forumSixteen Individuals Charged in $60 Million Medicare Fraud Scheme
https://www.justice.gov/usao-ndtx/pr/sixteen-individuals-charged-60-million-medicare-fraud-schemeDepartment of Justice
U.S. Attorneys Office
Northern District of Texas
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Tuesday, February 28, 2017
Sixteen Individuals Charged in $60 Million Medicare Fraud Scheme
North Texas Defendants Owned and Operated Novus Health Services
DALLAS An indictment returned by a federal grand jury in Dallas last week, and unsealed today, charges 16 individuals with offenses related to their participation in a health care fraud scheme, announced John Parker, U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Texas.
(snip)
Each indicted defendant is charged with one count of conspiracy to commit health care fraud. Twelve of the defendants are also charged with at least one other count related to the conspiracy.
(snip)
The indictment alleges that from July 2012 to September 2016, Novus billed Medicare and Medicaid more than sixty million dollars for fraudulent hospice services, of which more than thirty-five million dollars was paid to Novus. Specifically, defendants submitted false claims for hospice services, submitted false claims for continuous care hospice services, recruited ineligible hospice beneficiaries by providing kickbacks to referring physicians and healthcare facilities, and falsified and destroyed documents to conceal these activities from Medicare.
Novus Health Services and Optim Health Services, Inc. were operated and co-owned by Harris, who was a certified public accountant without any medical licenses. Harris operated the two companies essentially as one. Licensed physicians who were paid Novus medical directors provided little to no oversight of Novuss hospice patients. Care was directed primarily by Novus nurses and by Harris. Defendants who were not physicians would determine whether a beneficiary would be certified for, recertified for, or discharged from hospice; whether they would be placed on continuous care; and how and to what extent they would be medicated with drugs such as morphine and hydromorphone. These decisions on medical care were often driven by financial interest rather than patient need. The defendants would decide whether to place, keep, or discharge a beneficiary from hospice depending on how that decision would affect Novuss ability to bill Medicare.
Physicians were recruited who would refer hospice patients in exchange for medical director salaries. Assisted living facilities, in exchange for patient referrals, were provided remuneration including Certified Nursing Assistants paid for by Novus to staff the facilities. Novus medical directors would sign certificates of terminal illness indicating that they had determined that a beneficiary was eligible for hospice services regardless of whether this was true or not; prepare re-certifications of terminal illness for beneficiaries already on hospice, which falsely indicated that the beneficiaries continued to be hospice eligible; and routinely give medical directors login information to others to log into Novuss electronic medical records database to create and sign physician orders for services that had not been performed or had not been performed by the medical directors.
Harris would direct that beneficiaries be placed on continuous care, whether the beneficiaries needed this service or not. This decision would often be made without any consultation with a physician. Continuous care physicians orders were falsified and uploaded into Novuss electronic medical records database. When a beneficiary was on continuous care, the Novus nurses would administer high doses of Schedule II controlled medications such as morphine or hydromorphone, whether the beneficiary needed the medication or not. The defendants and others obtained these Schedule II medications with C2 prescription forms (used for the prescription of controlled substances) which had been unlawfully pre-signed by medical directors. One reason for this aggressive medicating practice was that Harris wanted to ensure that the beneficiaries medical records contained documentation that would justify billing Medicare at the higher continuous care billing rate. There were instances when these excessive dosages resulted in serious bodily injury or death to the beneficiaries.
(snip)
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 1339 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sixteen Individuals Charged in $60 Million Medicare Fraud Scheme (Original Post)
nitpicker
Mar 2017
OP
TexasTowelie
(112,411 posts)1. Here is the Dallas Morning News article
that named all of the defendants and also included reports on the callousness towards the couple running the fraud scheme.
http://www.dallasnews.com/news/frisco/2017/02/28/frisco-man-15-others-indicted-medicare-hospice-scheme-used-human-life-vulnerable-stage
It's a bit juicier than the DoJ press release.