Texas
Related: About this forumEliminating business tax on the agenda?
Can Texas afford to eliminate its state business tax?
As the federal tax bite grows, there is a nascent movement at the Texas Legislature to phase out the tax, commonly called the margins tax, without replacing it.
Business leaders and some conservative lawmakers say the tax, which taxes gross receipts as opposed to profits, is complicated and not applied evenly. Other critics of the tax say dropping it would make the states business climate even more attractive.
At first blush, eliminating the tax without a replacement might seem improbable. The tax raised $4.5 billion in 2012 and accounted for 10.3 percent of the states total taxes, according to the comptrollers office.
http://www.statesman.com/news/business/eliminating-business-tax-on-the-agenda/nTnpp/
In 2006, the Legislature adopted the margins tax to shift the tax burden from the states shrinking goods-producing industries to the growing service economy as well as to stop large corporations from evading the old franchise tax.
It taxes gross receipts minus a choice of the highest of three deductions: Cost of goods sold, such as raw materials, or compensation, or 30 percent of total revenues.
But the IRS and the state use different definitions for these deductions, forcing companies to keep two sets of books one for the state tax and one for federal purposes.
Source: Texas Taxpayers and Research Association
[font color=green]A more appropriate question is can Texas expect individual taxpayers to continue to pick up the slack for business interests? We provide the schools to educate their workers, the highways to transport their products, the court systems to enforce their contracts and the demand necessary to sell their products.
When will eliminating regressive taxes that affect individual taxpayers be on the agenda?[/font]
JohnRebel
(7 posts)The real question is can states like California afford to continue gouging business with high taxes when states like Texas go out of their way to attract business and jobs.
Ilsa
(61,695 posts)And California's business and job creation has outstripped Texas' in spite of the heavier tax burdens, although CA's unemployment remains higher.
I believe either CBS or NBC had covered it several nights ago.
mbperrin
(7,672 posts)who obviously are no good at business, because as soon as the abatements are gone, so is the business. If they can't operate without welfare, screw them.
Texas roads are trash, schools are underfunded drastically, Galveston is washing away, state parks are closing, college tuition is skyrocketing, and a whole lot more, and why? Because business wants a handout.
When you say compete with low taxes, you're saying, Be Somalia. They've got the lowest taxes in the world. So I encourage all businesses to relocate to the paradise of Somalia if they want to pay nothing for what they get.
The margins tax is about $5 billion per year, total. Business people themselves in the link say it's not large, they just don't want to pay it. Now I'm sure they'll get it - they get everything they want from the leeches in Austin, who suck our blood and give it to business.
But after the roads are completely gone, or all converted to toll operations (some savings, eh?), and education is shot, and the electric grid is full, and the universities are sold off to corporate operations, let's see which businesses stay, okay? Making cedar posts and collecting cow chips for fuel is not often thought of as the best ways to make a living.
If the welfare tits who call themselves businessmen don't want to pay for the cost of business, I welcome them to go to Somalia. And all their little ass-licking friends, too.
northoftheborder
(7,572 posts)TexasTowelie
(112,167 posts)Bye-bye troll baby.
Notice when RW nut jobs change the questions when they don't like them.
Gothmog
(145,218 posts)The margin tax is really a disguised income tax but it is still needed to help pay for govt.