Texas
Related: About this forumTexas Lawmakers Consider Bill That Would Make It Harder To Sue Trucking Companies Over Accidents
The push comes as Texas leads the nation in fatal crashes involving large trucks.Evidence of improper training could be shown in the second phase, but only if the driver was first found to be negligent. And in the second phase, plaintiffs like Harris would have to prove gross negligence, a much higher legal standard that requires proving a company proceeds with conscious indifference to safety.
Proving gross negligence also requires a unanimous jury verdict, whereas the lower threshold only needs 10 out of 12 jurors.
Rodriguez says the bill de-incentivizes safety.
Read more: https://www.texasstandard.org/stories/texas-lawmakers-consider-bill-that-would-make-it-harder-to-sue-trucking-companies-over-accidents/
Karadeniz
(22,515 posts)Deacon Blue
(252 posts)1. Limiting recoveries means trial lawyers, traditionally Democrats, will have less money for political donations and activities; and
2. Limiting recoveries is a great, big sloppy French kiss (or worse) for the businesses (trucking, insurance) which traditionally support Republican causes.
So who cares if Texas consumers are the ultimate victims? Its good politics, and good for bidness. And trial lawyers? Those jokers on TV? They need to be put outta business.
And the Republican electorate once again supports candidates who favor big bidness over them: after all, is the average Texan more likely to be be a wealthy stakeholder in the insurance-industrial complex, or roadkill after getting smashed by an 18-wheeler?
This reasoning is behind all so-called tort reform and frivolous lawsuit shaming. Long-running play in Austin, coming to a Republican-dominated legislature near you. And the theaters will be SRO for years.