Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

catbyte

(34,386 posts)
Mon Nov 21, 2022, 06:05 PM Nov 2022

Justices asked to hear dog toy dispute. Will they bite?


By JESSICA GRESKO
yesterday



WASHINGTON (AP) — The company that makes Jack Daniel’s is howling mad over a squeaking dog toy that parodies the whiskey’s signature bottle. Now, the liquor company is barking at the door of the Supreme Court.

Jack Daniel’s has asked the justices to hear its case against the manufacturer of the plastic Bad Spaniels toy. The high court could say as soon as Monday whether the justices will agree. A number of major companies from the makers of Campbell Soup to outdoor brand Patagonia and jeans maker Levi Strauss have urged the justices to take what they say is an important case for trademark law.

The toy that has Jack Daniel’s so doggone mad mimics the square shape of its whisky bottle as well as its black-and-white label and amber-colored liquor while adding what it calls “poop humor.” While the original bottle has the words “Old No. 7 brand” and “Tennessee Sour Mash Whiskey,” the parody proclaims: “The Old No. 2 on Your Tennessee Carpet.” Instead of the original’s note that it is 40% alcohol by volume, the parody says it’s “43% Poo by Vol.” and “100% Smelly.”

The toy retails for about $13 to $20 and the packaging notes in small font: “This product is not affiliated with Jack Daniel Distillery.”

snip

Full article

-----------------------------------------

Seriously?

Somebody needs to lighten up.
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Justices asked to hear dog toy dispute. Will they bite? (Original Post) catbyte Nov 2022 OP
Screw Jack Daniels. Get a sense of humor you ass-backwards clods! hlthe2b Nov 2022 #1
I doubt that parody is close enough to violate trademark law bucolic_frolic Nov 2022 #2
It seems so stupid. I have cat toys that look like food brands -- the "Meowchan ramen" package catbyte Nov 2022 #4
Streisand Effect* Pinback Nov 2022 #3

bucolic_frolic

(43,161 posts)
2. I doubt that parody is close enough to violate trademark law
Mon Nov 21, 2022, 06:20 PM
Nov 2022

Neither the text nor the sounds are close enough. The names are rhythmic, but spaniel is a type of dog. 'Bad' and 'Jack' just no cigar.

Furthermore, the products serve different purposes. One has a dog on the label, the other doesn't. One bottle is clear, one is opaque. The whiskey has a side to its label. 'Tennessee' is a state, very common on many products. So many differences.

catbyte

(34,386 posts)
4. It seems so stupid. I have cat toys that look like food brands -- the "Meowchan ramen" package
Mon Nov 21, 2022, 06:35 PM
Nov 2022

catnip toy frequently startles me because I wonder where that label came from that's on the floor. Especially since I don't buy Maruchan ramen, lol. Granted, it's usually in the early morning before I've had my coffee, but still...

Nobody would confuse a squeaky pink chew toy with a bottle of booze. The folks at Jack Daniels need to get a life.

Pinback

(12,155 posts)
3. Streisand Effect*
Mon Nov 21, 2022, 06:27 PM
Nov 2022

I suddenly want to buy one of these toys for every dog owner I know!

If Jack Daniels had a lick o' sense (as we say down in the holler), they'd do a joint marketing campaign with these guys and make more money than a snake-handlin' preacher at a tent revival.

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_effect

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Weird News»Justices asked to hear do...