Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

question everything

(47,486 posts)
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 11:44 AM Apr 2016

Declassifier?

Heard this through meandering source but still, interesting.

"declassifier": someone who, by virtue of their official position, automatically declassifies anything they divulge.

Cheney would provide to the press the most twisted take on some issue of concern, say "enhanced interrogation techniques",
designed to frame the issue to his advantage. And Cheney was a declassifier, and had a perfect legal right to say whatever he wanted, regardless of its classification.

Individuals on the House and Senate Intelligence Committee could do nothing about it, not even refute since they were not declassifiers.

The conclusion, therefore, is that The Secretary of State is a declassifier.

So during her tenure, Clinton couldn't possibly have divulged classified information. Of course one might call her use of the
private server, but legally she is in a solid position. And nobody has pointed to any actual compromise of national security resulting from her use of the private server.

Interesting.

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Declassifier? (Original Post) question everything Apr 2016 OP
Hillary had the authority to declassify... yallerdawg Apr 2016 #1
Thank you for the link. Now tell this to all the Sanderistas on GDP question everything Apr 2016 #2
It woudn't make a lick of difference to them on GD-P! yallerdawg Apr 2016 #3
That certainly presents an interesting fact. nt SunSeeker Apr 2016 #4

question everything

(47,486 posts)
2. Thank you for the link. Now tell this to all the Sanderistas on GDP
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 12:46 PM
Apr 2016

who are still talking about "indictment" while drooling.

Was this ever posted on GDP? Not that it will make a difference.

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
3. It woudn't make a lick of difference to them on GD-P!
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 12:52 PM
Apr 2016

GD-P is a "fact-free" zone!

All we can do there is annoy each other - which is sort of satisfying when you are right, as we are.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»Declassifier?