Hillary Clinton
Related: About this forumBernie Sanders’s ‘factually incorrect’ delegate math
Fact Checker
Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders criticized the Democratic party's nomination process and superdelegates during a rally in Santa Cruz, Calif., on May 31. He blasted reports that rival Hillary Clinton had clinched the nomination as "factually incorrect." (AP)
Literally eight months before the first ballot was cast in Iowa, she had almost all of the superdelegates on board. That is an absurd system. Now, on Tuesday night, on the 7th, you are going to hear from media saying that Hillary Clinton has received 80 or 90 delegates from New Jersey and other states the nominating process is over, Secretary Clinton has won. That is factually incorrect. That is just not factually correct.
Sen. Bernie Sanders, speech in Santa Cruz, Calif., May 31
Sanders has complained regularly about the absurd system used in the Democratic Party presidential nomination process a combination of 4,051 delegates elected through primaries and caucuses and then 714 superdelegates, who are elected officials, former elected officials and other eminence grises of the Democratic Party who can back whomever they want.
Hillary Clinton is on track to win a majority of the pledged delegates, almost certainly by June 7. But because superdelegates make up 15 percent of the total delegate pool, neither Clinton nor Sanders can obtain the 2,383 delegates needed to clinch the nomination without the support of superdelegates.
But the irony is that without the superdelegate system in place, Sanders likely would be toast on June 7, when six states essentially complete the primary process, including California with its 475 delegates. (There is also a vote on June 14 in D.C. to award 20 delegates.) So Sanders is complaining about a system that is actually keeping hope alive for his supporters, on the theory that superdelegates can change their vote any time before the convention starts in late July. But its a false hope.
Basic delegate math
beachbum bob
(10,437 posts)just noise and means nothing
it over and been over for over a month...the media needs to stoke interest...and working sanders ego makes it so easy.....and sanders finds it easy to keep conning his supporters for more money
it is over
Iamaartist
(3,300 posts)Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)Iamaartist
(3,300 posts)Koinos
(2,792 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Required and does require the same of Sanders and yet he wants the Super Delegates to switch over and give him the required number of combined delegates, now this would be a rigged system and a double standard.
I feel sure Hillary will get half of the pledged delegates also, with a majority of the pledged delegates and super delegates Hillary will be the nominee and the oligarchy by Sanders will not insert his will on the DNC.
Cha
(297,692 posts)Yay, more Pinocchios for BS.. this time on his Delegate Math.. 'bout time Pinocchio came calling!
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2016/06/02/bernie-sanderss-factually-incorrect-delegate-math/?tid=pm_politics_pop_b
Mahalo, Iaaa~
Iamaartist
(3,300 posts)Gothmog
(145,567 posts)GusBob
(7,286 posts)1.If I were to apply for an important position, I would sure as heck know all the requirements necessary to fulfill the position.
2.If I went into the final interviews for the position, and lied about the requirements and my failure to fulfill them, and yet still claim I was qualified for the position, that would be fraudulent.
3. If I was the employer who took on this unqualified and dishonest candidate, I would be a fool and would worry about the future of my company as well.
George II
(67,782 posts)...they want the superdelegates to vote AGAINST the people?
Now, who was talking about "camp weathervane" and moving the goal posts?
BobbyDrake
(2,542 posts)Iamaartist
(3,300 posts)BobbyDrake
(2,542 posts)Let's add one more giant untruth as a cherry on top: "Bernie Sanders will return to the Senate and have influence there."
savalez
(3,517 posts)Legends303
(481 posts)when the say Clinton is only winning in superdelegates and this the same race as 2008 which both are untrue. If Clinton was winning only by superdelegates and losing in the popular vote and pledged delegates, then yeah they would have a point. She is beating him soundly in both. Sanders won in most small states with low turnout.