Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DeepModem Mom

(38,402 posts)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 11:54 AM Aug 2015

The Turf Battle Getting Sidestepped In The Clinton Email Story (HILLARY GROUP)

The media's frantic coverage of the ongoing controversy surrounding Hillary Clinton's secretary of state emails -- and whether some of them contained classified information -- regularly presents the allegations as being precise and unambiguous.

But are they?

The latest media uproar swirls around the fact that the inspectors general for the 17 spy agencies, which make up what's known as the U.S. Intelligence Community, disclosed that some emails which had been routed through a private server Clinton used during her tenure as secretary of state contained classified information, "including two emails whose content is now deemed to be 'Top Secret,'" according to McClatchy.

A key fact, via the Associated Press, is that, "Clinton didn't transmit the sensitive information herself, they said, and nothing in the emails she received makes direct reference to communications intercepts, confidential intelligence methods or any other form of sensitive sourcing."

To date, the straightforward media narrative goes like this: Because officials within the intelligence community have determined that Clinton received emails that contained classified information, that means Clinton was at fault and an investigation is underway to determine how she could have been so reckless and wrong. (The New York Times badly muddied the waters on the email story when it erroneously reported intelligence officials requested a criminal investigation into Clinton's handling of her emails. They did no such thing.)...

Much of the press, and especially the political press, continues to misstate the story, emphasizing how it's all about how Clinton handled her emails on a private server while secretary of state. But much of the recent scandal-mongering actually revolves around the process by which Clinton's years-old emails are being released to the public....

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2015/08/18/the-turf-battle-getting-sidestepped-in-the-clin/204992 via Media Matters

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Turf Battle Getting Sidestepped In The Clinton Email Story (HILLARY GROUP) (Original Post) DeepModem Mom Aug 2015 OP
I am looking forward to a report from the FBI, perhaps this can be put to bed for a final time. Thinkingabout Aug 2015 #1
I doubt it. Facts mean nothing to the corporate media nor their corporate masters. Iliyah Aug 2015 #2

Iliyah

(25,111 posts)
2. I doubt it. Facts mean nothing to the corporate media nor their corporate masters.
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 12:16 PM
Aug 2015

We have become a country of bullsh*t flies, truth dies.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»The Turf Battle Getting S...