Hillary Clinton
Related: About this forumSo I"m watching Chris Hayes discussing how Trump also attracts
Sanders supporters.
I've been saying for months that Sanders is the other side of the Trump coin...
You sure see it here at DU...
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)and not enough on "economics"---my husband has heard me complain about this Sanders trait, but just jaw-dropped hearing him say it aloud.
Gloria
(17,663 posts)Notice Paragraph 2...
http://www.gutenberg.us/articles/horseshoe_theory
The horseshoe theory in political science asserts that rather than the far left and the far right being at opposite and opposing ends of a linear political continuum, they in fact closely resemble one another, much like the ends of a horseshoe. The theory is attributed to French writer Jean-Pierre Faye.[1]
Horseshoe theory competes with the conventional linear left-right continuum system as well as the various multidimensional systems. Proponents of the theory point to similarities between the extreme left and the extreme right. Specifically, the two ends share an authoritarian element. In extreme left political systems (such as communism) the government takes control of the economic resources. In extreme right political systems (such as fascism) the government also takes control of the economic life, creating a central planning. With both extremes, this theory asserts, the power elite are opposed to genuine clean elections, genuinely free media and speech, and similar democratic institutions that characterise the political center.
Contents
1 Origin of the term
2 Criticism
3 See also
4 References
Origin of the term
The earliest use of the term in political theory appears to be from Jean-Pierre Faye's book Le Siècle des idéologies.[2] Others have attributed the theory as having come from Lipset, Bell and an entire pluralist school.[3]
Criticism
Critics of the theory have suggested that many sociologists consider the Horseshoe theory to have been discredited.[4]
In University of Reading academic Peter Barker's[5] book, GDR and Its History, Peter Thompson[6] of the University of Sheffield observes that the theory is "increasingly orthodox", and describes the theory as seeing "left and right-wing parties being closer to each other than the centre".
See also
Left-right politics
Political spectrum
Blair's Law
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)I identify as left-wing economically, but think white male cis-het "socialism" tends to be non-intersectional, which is what makes it also play well with the same white middle-class male anxieties as Trumpism. It's easy to say nothing else is an economic concern if you don't suffer from the particular problems that can restrict your life under racism, misogyny and homophobia, etc.
Gloria
(17,663 posts)Last edited Fri Jan 8, 2016, 02:11 AM - Edit history (1)
but the Sanders people buy into this...
lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)Ellen Forradalom
(16,159 posts)BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)And I feel I'll be using it a LOT before the primaries are over.
Ellen Forradalom
(16,159 posts)Skidmore
(37,364 posts)*snort*
DURHAM D
(32,603 posts)National Nurses United are regretting their endorsement of BS. What a mistake.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)synergie
(1,901 posts)DURHAM D
(32,603 posts)I can not think of a union with a more diverse membership.
okasha
(11,573 posts)There's a place on the circumference where the two become indistinguishable.
Cary
(11,746 posts)But given the fact that Trump is a lifelong liberal Democrat until the time he figured he could be a demagogue, I don't think the commonality is ideology at least not directly.
I think Trump supporters are angry at Republicans because they cannot deliver on their unrealistic promises, and they are stupid enough to choose Trump out of pure anger.
Bernie by contrast talks substance, but still gives voice to anger.
The only real commonality in "conservative" ideology is their irrational hatred of "Liberal."
Could Sanders supporters become 100% hate motivated and join forces behind Trump? That thought never entered my mind, until now. Sure they could and that ideology of hate is a very, very dangerous ideology.
Cripes!
Cha
(296,780 posts)Cha
(296,780 posts)Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)This time.
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)Oh, I hope I can cathc a clip of it...
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)One on one with Bernie Sanders
Chris Hayes talks to Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) about his approach for courting Republican voters - even Donald Trump supporters. Duration: 6:24
MSNBC doesn't have a link that will render on DU, but here is the link for the episode, with the title of the chapter I cited:
http://www.msnbc.com/all-in/watch/one-on-one-with-bernie-sanders-598105155751#discussions
Hope that helps, their website sucks, sorry!
Gloria
(17,663 posts)because the simplistic boob thinks EVERYTHING stems from economic issues...
He's is such a FOOL
And Hayes just laps it up...real journalist, there, no probing on that at all...
What I saw was the panel, I think they were at a pub or something, talking about the Trump/Sanders inbreeding...
OH, I expect to get alerted or something because I'm being so "hurtful." Even though it's all in plain sight...on the TEE VEE
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)He did a great series on the CA drought this year, but his Sanders fanboy coverage is risible.
Gloria
(17,663 posts)what's he's been reduced to...
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)watching his subtle attacks on Hillary Clinton while drooling over Sanders and Sanders supporters. I just switch the channel when his show comes on.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)It's sad. I'm sure Sanders is stoked to take advantage of the platform, since Hayes will give him lots of airtime, but it's so unbalanced it is absurd. I'm almost ready to switch over to CNN, lol.
Walk away
(9,494 posts)I don't believe his show will make it much past this election season.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)Walk away
(9,494 posts)After the nomination they won't have anyone watching him. He'll be sitting around a table with a bunch of other Progressives on Saturday morning, chipping in he 2 cents.
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)Actually, I can.
And there are those on the other thread saying that Sanders will be better on women's issues, and that Hillary shattering the glass ceiling won't change much...
Thank you, Starry Messenger!
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)I am still pretty hot from seeing that. I've read articles where he's said similar things, but it feels vindicating folks are seeing this too. He is *still* diminishing our struggles by misdirection and re-centering a colorblind version of economic justice.
Response to Starry Messenger (Reply #9)
postatomic This message was self-deleted by its author.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)And he did use that word, your quote is nearly identical to what I recall. Having my concerns "othered" out of his economic calculus really burns me.
After fighting for our seat at the table, a struggle that has taken years, Sanders self-nominates as the Brogressive-in-Chief and basically acts like every other paper-socialist on the internet who airily waves away the struggle for equal and civil rights as "bourgeois." Must be nice!
Thanks buddy! I needed another year of being called a capitalist pig because I think preserving abortion rights is important, as well as fighting against all of the other forms of oppression that we get ON TOP of poverty and income inequality that drag us down even lower than white guys who are just finally getting it in the shorts from financial disparity.
/rant
I cannot wait for this primary to be over.
Response to lunamagica (Reply #8)
Gloria This message was self-deleted by its author.
Tommy2Tone
(1,307 posts)Saying there is a real opportunity for each of them to attract the others base. Said they talked to Trump supporters and they also like Bernie.
Makes sense have you read what is going on the Bernie forum? It's swift boat style stuff. -
Gloria
(17,663 posts)ANd then there's the bullshit about how Clinton OPPOSES family leave...it's the TAX INCREASES she opposes not family leave.
Bernie supporters are increasingly twisted...they sound like Republicans to me...oh, that's right, they do like TRUMP, too...
And Sanders knows what he is doing...and I've decided I could NEVER vote for him...I actually dislike him at this point...
lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)Gloria
(17,663 posts)not so much....
Yes,, WHICH IS IT????
Tommy2Tone
(1,307 posts)It's a bit hard to sponsor a bill when you are not in the congress. Sanders supporters have made me sour on him. Now they are going after Bill Clinton. Talking of his failed presidency and blaming Hillary for Bill's wandering eye.
It's disgusting.
Treant
(1,968 posts)I'm in the same boat as you. Being told that people's rights have been over-emphasized is disgusting.
I'll crawl through glass to vote for Mrs. Clinton...not that it matters much, I'm post-Super-Tuesday, so it won't matter.
I'm still in the "grind my teeth and vote for Bernie on Election Day on the off chance he actually becomes the candidate," but...
FloridaBlues
(4,002 posts)Cary
(11,746 posts)I am Jewish Iike Bernie. We were very much discriminated against. There was a Jewish quota at Northwestern and a very wealthy Jewish family went to them and said here is a huge sum of money and it's yours if you remove that Jewish quota.
As Alan Dershowitz said we Jews bought first class citizenship, relatively recently too.
That may be Bernie's perspective.
GusBob
(7,286 posts)Proud to be one of "them"
It started on DU back in the used car salesman days
Walk away
(9,494 posts)and treat the supporters of other candidates. I honestly don't see any difference.
Gloria
(17,663 posts)I am pragmatic and want The Supreme Court in Dem hands not a GOP shithead....or someone who is more pro - gun than me...
It's increasingly clear that Trump and Sanders are playing the "emotions" card to pull people in....Sanders halo is getting tarnished...
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)This country doesn't need that.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,220 posts)the same group of voters.
Cha
(296,780 posts)The oh so Disappointed.
The Disaffected
The ***********
Asterisking that last one.. don't want to risk a hide speaking my mind.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,220 posts)Ellen Forradalom
(16,159 posts)In 2000 I wrote an online quiz that asked whether a given quote was uttered by Ralph Nader or Pat Buchanan. It was so difficult, I frequently failed it--and I assembled the quotes.