Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Guys, what do you think about MOM for Hillary's VP? (Original Post) lunamagica Mar 2016 OP
I could get behind Martin O'Malley. I won't be calling him MOM though. n/t Stand and Fight Mar 2016 #1
The Mom/MOM ticket? Nonhlanhla Mar 2016 #12
LOL... The same thought occurred to me. Totally understandable! n/t Stand and Fight Mar 2016 #23
could do worse but maybe could do better 6chars Mar 2016 #2
No==not that he's not a good guy, but he doesn't help demographically. MADem Mar 2016 #3
I think you guys are right. He didnt get much traction -actually, not traction at all lunamagica Mar 2016 #4
i like him, but i like castro better. DesertFlower Mar 2016 #5
Check out the M'OM Group JustAnotherGen Mar 2016 #6
I'm glad to hear it! Treant Mar 2016 #17
I like him, but I think he'd be better in a Cabinet position DemonGoddess Mar 2016 #7
Yes, I agree. KittyWampus Mar 2016 #14
No, he brings nothing to the table. leftofcool Mar 2016 #8
No. Lil Missy Mar 2016 #9
Good guy and he'd campaign well, but we need someone who brings more to the table. RBInMaine Mar 2016 #10
Not after the Freddie Gray tragedy, no Tarc Mar 2016 #11
I would have voted for him over Clinton in the Primary. Think he'd be excellent. KittyWampus Mar 2016 #13
He would put people at a rally to sleep. LiberalFighter Mar 2016 #15
No to Veep - maybe a cabinet post SharonClark Mar 2016 #16
I love O'Malley ismnotwasm Mar 2016 #18
i like it....n/t asuhornets Mar 2016 #19
No--he didn't have a strong record as gov - budget problems. And spooky3 Mar 2016 #20
I'd look for someone with a pulse. n/t fleabiscuit Mar 2016 #21
That anti-O'Malley nastiness in some of these replies is making me wonder if I belong here DavidDvorkin Mar 2016 #22
Yeah, I don't care for those replies either. But they are in the minority. Just a few lunamagica Mar 2016 #24

6chars

(3,967 posts)
2. could do worse but maybe could do better
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 04:35 AM
Mar 2016

He didn't attract a significant following in the primaries. Not a pitbull if that is needed. And don't think Hillary will need help with Maryland.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
3. No==not that he's not a good guy, but he doesn't help demographically.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 04:49 AM
Mar 2016

She's got the east coast, the south, and the northern midwest covered--comes from IL, Senator from NY, worked in DC, FL of Arkansas; what she could use is some western love. I think a dynamic latino or latina (why not an all female ticket?) is the way to go (and not Bill Richardson, either). Someone young, up-and-coming, in their forties, and vetted to within an inch of their lives.

Cabinet post for MOM, perhaps? Ambassadorship? Where do his interests lie?

lunamagica

(9,967 posts)
4. I think you guys are right. He didnt get much traction -actually, not traction at all
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 04:58 AM
Mar 2016

which I will never understand.

It needs to be a diverse ticket. Oh, wee, it was just a thought.

I hope he plays an important role in her cabinet.

JustAnotherGen

(31,823 posts)
6. Check out the M'OM Group
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 07:07 AM
Mar 2016

He's moved on to Environmental work. As a supporter of his - I'm glad to see that.

He can do his best work as an activist. Robert Redford turns 80 this year - he won't be alive forever. All of this summits and global discussions he attends? O'Malley doesn't need his permission to to take over. He just needs to because it was and remains his greatest strength.

He can have a greater impact outside of government than inside on this issue. Even if he becomes a lobbyist for a renewable or solar or wind energy company I will be happy - because Congress will act when they see there is a payoff for them.

Clinton as President will give their legislation the seal of approval.

Treant

(1,968 posts)
17. I'm glad to hear it!
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 07:34 PM
Mar 2016

I love MO'M and want him to do well. I would have happily accepted him as the candidate if he'd won over Clinton (although I do prefer Clinton).

 

RBInMaine

(13,570 posts)
10. Good guy and he'd campaign well, but we need someone who brings more to the table.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 08:29 AM
Mar 2016

I would be looking at someone like Julian Castro or Bill Richardson who bring diversity, or Sherrod Brown who brings strong progressive credentials and is from Ohio. Or maybe Mark Warner from Virginia. I really like that guy, and he's from a swing state.

Tarc

(10,476 posts)
11. Not after the Freddie Gray tragedy, no
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 09:37 AM
Mar 2016

I don't want him within a mile of the Clinton campaign, tbh.

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
13. I would have voted for him over Clinton in the Primary. Think he'd be excellent.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 10:02 AM
Mar 2016

Hope he gets a position in the Administration.

He's young enough to be viable for POTUS in the future.

Edit- like others, I don't think he brings enough advantage to the VP spot.

spooky3

(34,452 posts)
20. No--he didn't have a strong record as gov - budget problems. And
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 07:53 PM
Mar 2016

I wish I could recall where I read this but I believe someone did an analysis of the geographic diversity - VP idea and did not find support for the idea that it helped carry the ticket, contrary to popular opinion. So a Clinton - MOM ticket could be perceived as geographically diverse (Arkansas/Illinois, plus MD--pretty similar to Obama (IL/Hawaii) and Biden (Delaware). But if geographic diversity doesn't help, given the gov. record and the fact that Dems have not warmed to him (let alone others) I don't think it helps. I agree with those who say MOM could be a good cabinet member or ambassador.

I hate to say it (particularly as a woman), but I think the country as a whole (men and women) would vote against an all-female ticket, just on the basis of gender, and they may react the same way to a woman & member of any minority group ticket. And Castro is virtually unknown to the average voter. So I can't favor Castro either, though he would be excellent to continue in the cabinet.

I think she needs to find a well-regarded white male for VP whom people can easily envision as Pres (i.e., totally unlike Paul Ryan or Sarah Palin), but should not try to appeal to the conservative voter, because she will win few of them no matter whom she chooses.

DavidDvorkin

(19,477 posts)
22. That anti-O'Malley nastiness in some of these replies is making me wonder if I belong here
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 01:16 AM
Mar 2016

I was an O'Malley supporter and became a Hillary supporter when he dropped out. I felt welcome here until this happened.

lunamagica

(9,967 posts)
24. Yeah, I don't care for those replies either. But they are in the minority. Just a few
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 05:29 AM
Mar 2016

I personally wish it'd had gone better for him. I believe he will be president one day.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»Guys, what do you think a...