Latin America
Related: About this forumMedia Play Up Protests, Play Down Effect of US Sanctions in Cuba
JULY 16, 2021
ALAN MACLEOD
A wave of protests in Cuba became the somewhat unlikely focus of global attention earlier this week, the events becoming the worldwide No. 1 trend on Twitter for over 24 hours, as celebrities, politicians and even the president of the United States weighed in on the action. A statement from Joe Bidens office read:
We stand with the Cuban people and their clarion call for freedom and relief from the tragic grip of the pandemic and from the decades of repression and economic suffering to which they have been subjected by Cubas authoritarian regime.
Media, too, were quick to focus on the story, giving the protests front and center coverage, something extremely unusual for demonstrations in Latin America. Far larger and more deadly movements in Chile and Ecuador were mostly ignored by the corporate press (FAIR.org, 12/6/19). Meanwhile, the political situation in Haiti, which has seen three continuous years of nationwide protest, was overwhelmingly ignored (FAIR.org, 10/26/19) until the assassination of US-backed President Jovenel Moïse last week.
Downplaying the blockade
However, while giving the protests a great deal of coverage, the corporate press across the political spectrum consistently downplayed one of the primary causes of unrest: the increasingly punitive US blockade.
In a country known for repressive crackdowns on dissent, the rallies were widely viewed as astonishing, wrote the New York Times (7/11/21), presenting the movement as a laudable action against an authoritarian government that had brought little but misery to its people. Only 11 paragraphs into the story did it mention the sanctions, and even then, it put the information in the form of an accusation from the Cuban government, a source the Times had already cued the reader to be skeptical of.
But this was actually among the most balanced coverage from corporate media. NBC News (7/12/21) waited until the last of 24 paragraphs to note that the Cuban government attributes the economic crisis to US embargo against Cuba and sanctions, which former President Donald Trump intensified. The story had previously claimed that Cuba was effectively choking itself by refusing to allow humanitarian aid into the country.
. . .
What is particularly galling about the refusal to take seriously the idea that an economic attack from the worlds sole superpower is at least a major factor in Cubas troubles is that this is the US explicitly stated goal. Official documents going back to 1960 note that, by denying money and supplies to Cuba, the US hopes to decrease monetary and real wages, to bring about hunger, desperation and [the] overthrow of [the] government.
More:
https://fair.org/home/media-play-up-protests-play-down-effect-of-us-sanctions-in-cuba/
You might be interested in learning Dwight D Eisenhower was the President when the document linked was written!
Dwight David "Ike" Eisenhower GCB, OM, RE, GCS, CCLH, KC, NPk (/ˈaɪzənhaʊ.ər/; October 14, 1890 March 28, 1969) was an American military officer and statesman who served as the 34th president of the United States from 1953 to 1961.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dwight_D._Eisenhower
That was BEFORE JFK, of course.
Judi Lynn
(160,610 posts)From the article above:
Photo switcheroos
Despite being limited in size and immediately met by substantial counter-demonstrations, corporate media were keen to present the weekends actions as widespread and momentous. As one Miami resident insisted to NBC News (7/12/21), The whole country is in the streets. Video evidence seems to suggest otherwise, and that the counter-demonstrations were at least as well-attended.
Nevertheless, many outlets explicitly stated the opposite. Reuters (7/11/21), for example, reported, Thousands took to the streets in various parts of Havana on Sunday, including the historic center, drowning out groups of government supporters waving the Cuban flag and chanting Fidel. Meanwhile, Voice of America (7/12/21) claimed that despite Díaz-Canels demands, he could only muster smaller pro-government demonstrations.
If this was the case, it is ironic indeed that a host of outlets resorted to using images of pro-government demonstrations to illustrate how large and impressive the anti-government movement was. The Guardian (7/12/21), Fox News (7/11/21), Boston Globe (7/11/21), Financial Times (7/12/21), Yahoo! News (7/11/21) and NBCs Today program (7/13/21) were among that used an image of masses of government supporters gathering in central Havana to show the extent of the anti-Communist demonstrations. To anyone with knowledge of Cuba, the giant red and black flags emboldened with the words 26 Julio (Fidel Castros political party) should have been a dead giveaway. (The Guardian and FT updated their stories after my tweet pointing out the false attribution went viral.)
Meanwhile, CNN (Instagram, 7/11/21) used a photo of an impressively attended rally in Miami to promote an article headlined Cubans Take to Streets in Rare Anti-Government Protest Over Lack of Freedoms, Worsening Economy. (The post has since been deleted.) National Geographic (7/13/21) pulled a similar trick, although they at least included a caption informing eagle-eyed readers that the image was taken in Florida. Pictures of anti-government demos in Cuba showing similar numbers of people appear not to exist.
There is every reason for Cubans to be discontent. In recent times, prices for increasingly scarce foodstuffs have risen, and there are shortages of some basic goods and medicines, leading to increased deprivation, long lines and waiting times. Yet by refusing to frame these as intentional consequences of US foreign policy, corporate media consumers are less prone to critique their own governments actions and more likely to support the very measures that are partially responsible for keeping Cuba in the state that it is in. A skeptical reader might wonder if that is exactly the point.
- - -
Boston Globe: Cubans Denounce 'Misery' in Biggest Protests in Decades
The Boston Globe (7/11/21), like numerous other outlets, published a photo of a
pro-government rally to illustrate the size of anti-government protests.
https://fair.org/home/media-play-up-protests-play-down-effect-of-us-sanctions-in-cuba/
(So sad. The Miami Herald or its Spanish language "El Heraldo," has been caught multiple times screwing around with photographs, adding people to create a crowd where there was none, or juxtaposing two Havana policemen and some Havana possible hookers to make it look as if the police are involved in prostitution. They had to retract and apologize. Happened around 2000, give or take a couple of years.)
mia
(8,362 posts)An excellent documentary, produced by Oliver Stone. It addresses the U.S. role in Cuba. Here is the first of three parts.