Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProudToBeBlueInRhody

(16,399 posts)
Tue Aug 7, 2012, 10:58 AM Aug 2012

More proof The Patriarchy has full control of the Olympics

http://olympics.yardbarker.com/blog/olympics/article/stephanie_rice_used_a_stripper_pole_in_her_home_to_train/11394808

Australian swimmer Stephanie Rice sparked some pre-Olympics buzz by tweeting the picture seen above of her modeling a bikini designed by a friend. Now we're learning what training methods -- aside from swimming -- Rice utilized to keep her figure fit.

During a radio interview with "The Hot Breakfast" on Triple M radio in Melbourne, Rice confirmed a rumor that she had a stripper pole in her apartment.

"I did do some classes and I made one of my family members buy me the pole because I was, like, well this can be cross-training exercise," Rice told the radio station.

"But I don't have it any more," she clarified.


Oh noes.....boycott, and re-educate! Clearly this young woman needs help!
32 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
More proof The Patriarchy has full control of the Olympics (Original Post) ProudToBeBlueInRhody Aug 2012 OP
Just when my erotoxins were coming back to uncritical levels.... opiate69 Aug 2012 #1
I want to know what devious male phallopressor is the puppet master. Warren DeMontague Aug 2012 #2
Well she made the decision but only because the patriarchy brainwashed her in to 4th law of robotics Aug 2012 #3
This message was self-deleted by its author Upton Aug 2012 #4
Obviously, she needs a firm talking to by a 2nd wave Dworkin adherent .. Upton Aug 2012 #5
That is a kick ass suit! Behind the Aegis Aug 2012 #9
It's not the Pole that is Patriarchal One_Life_To_Give Aug 2012 #6
or the woman putting on a 2 piece cause her friend made it and the men in hysteria that she did it seabeyond Aug 2012 #7
Sorry, but you are projecting again. ProudToBeBlueInRhody Aug 2012 #8
offensive, but as predictable as the tides. opiate69 Aug 2012 #11
hysteria??? opiate69 Aug 2012 #10
"that is all" ???? opiate69 Aug 2012 #12
No, she tweeted the picture because she wanted people to look at it. Warren DeMontague Aug 2012 #13
who is pissed off warren that she dared to show off a friends two piece suit? do tell? seabeyond Aug 2012 #15
You cannot come into this group to yell at people, accuse them of "making shit up", etc. Warren DeMontague Aug 2012 #16
Question: what would you consider an appropriate response from males to this picture 4th law of robotics Aug 2012 #18
More bullshit ProudToBeBlueInRhody Aug 2012 #19
a falsehood *cough- lie* from seabeyond??!? opiate69 Aug 2012 #20
I've noticed that it doesn't matter WHAT I *actually* say, some people will pretend I said what they Warren DeMontague Aug 2012 #32
Rice was slammed in 2010 after posting what was interpreted as a homophobic slur. seabeyond Aug 2012 #21
You said no one was pissed off by this picture except the OP 4th law of robotics Aug 2012 #22
Apparently all articles I post are "garbage" ProudToBeBlueInRhody Aug 2012 #25
I think she has me on ignore 4th law of robotics Aug 2012 #26
Honestly I thought she had ME on it ProudToBeBlueInRhody Aug 2012 #28
should we start a pool on when the self-delete party`s going to start? opiate69 Aug 2012 #29
Self-deletes are a tool the patriarchy uses to keep women down 4th law of robotics Aug 2012 #30
Please don't mock this ProudToBeBlueInRhody Aug 2012 #31
Keep spinning and changing the subject ProudToBeBlueInRhody Aug 2012 #23
what in the fuck are you blathering about???? opiate69 Aug 2012 #24
If you want to do this, you can do it in a different group. Warren DeMontague Aug 2012 #27
Literally none of that happened 4th law of robotics Aug 2012 #17
What if it is done for an audience? What if the person WANTS an audience? Warren DeMontague Aug 2012 #14
 

opiate69

(10,129 posts)
1. Just when my erotoxins were coming back to uncritical levels....
Tue Aug 7, 2012, 12:11 PM
Aug 2012

Actually, my wife recently took some pole dancing classes... she said it was one of the best workout routines she`s ever done, especially for the "core" muscles. And while their recital was somewhat sensual, the dances were a beautiful display of grace and athleticism as well.

 

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)
3. Well she made the decision but only because the patriarchy brainwashed her in to
Tue Aug 7, 2012, 05:32 PM
Aug 2012

being proud of her body. Which means she didn't really consent to this picture. Which means anyone looking at it is basically a peeping tom, probably a rapist too.

Real women hate the way they look and are ashamed of their appearance.

Response to 4th law of robotics (Reply #3)

Upton

(9,709 posts)
5. Obviously, she needs a firm talking to by a 2nd wave Dworkin adherent ..
Wed Aug 8, 2012, 08:42 AM
Aug 2012

if we can find one..they appear to be swiftly becoming an endangered species, particularly outside of DU.

How dare this woman be proud of her body and sexuality. I mean, doesn't she realize that agents of the "patriarchy" are gazing upon her with lust in their hearts?

She needs to be reeducated with 2nd wave dogma ...sex is bad, mkay?

One_Life_To_Give

(6,036 posts)
6. It's not the Pole that is Patriarchal
Wed Aug 8, 2012, 02:20 PM
Aug 2012

It's not the Pole that is Patriarchal but the idea that only Women can work-out with it and that women do it for men's entertainment. Same is true for belly dancing. Either sex can do it and it's not provocative, sexual, exploitative if it's done for personal exercise without an audience.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
7. or the woman putting on a 2 piece cause her friend made it and the men in hysteria that she did it
Wed Aug 8, 2012, 02:24 PM
Aug 2012

for them, handing over her sexuality.

look at the posts on this thread. this woman puts on a two piece cause her friend made it.

that is all

now, read the posts from the men who flip it to her sexuality and it is ALL about entertaining them.

yes

there is a difference.

ProudToBeBlueInRhody

(16,399 posts)
8. Sorry, but you are projecting again.
Wed Aug 8, 2012, 02:32 PM
Aug 2012

I've seen no one here asking to be "entertained" by her. Really fucking offensive when you lie like this.

 

opiate69

(10,129 posts)
12. "that is all" ????
Wed Aug 8, 2012, 02:40 PM
Aug 2012

Wrong again....she put on a two piece suit because her friend made it, and then took a picture of herself wearing it and posted it on her public twitter account, pretty much seeking an audience, which your buddy there claims is somehow mens` fault.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
13. No, she tweeted the picture because she wanted people to look at it.
Wed Aug 8, 2012, 03:12 PM
Aug 2012

And then, people look at it, and admire it.

And everyone is happy, except the people whom the whole exchange invariably pisses off.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
15. who is pissed off warren that she dared to show off a friends two piece suit? do tell?
Wed Aug 8, 2012, 03:26 PM
Aug 2012

oh wait... whomever made shit up for this thread.

a woman wears a two piece a friend made and shows it off.

wow.... horrible.

you men on the thread made her into your little sex toy and them gave it to other women. your creation of make believe.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
16. You cannot come into this group to yell at people, accuse them of "making shit up", etc.
Wed Aug 8, 2012, 03:29 PM
Aug 2012

And I do think you're way off into projection-land.

Do you understand how twitter works?

 

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)
18. Question: what would you consider an appropriate response from males to this picture
Wed Aug 8, 2012, 03:50 PM
Aug 2012

if they find her attractive?

Something that doesn't involve turning her in to a sex toy, in your words. Or objectifying her. Or committing ocular rape.

I understand if you can't come up with an answer.

ProudToBeBlueInRhody

(16,399 posts)
19. More bullshit
Wed Aug 8, 2012, 03:56 PM
Aug 2012
http://articles.nydailynews.com/2012-06-28/news/32461311_1_twitter-feed-bikini-swimsuit

The three-time Olympic gold medalist has been slammed for posting the "racy" picture. Rice suffered backlash on Twitter from fans, one follower under the name @allyouzombies going as far as to say she "has brought disgrace to the australian swim team and she should be dropped."

While critics have slammed the shot, others are coming to the swimmer's defense. Designer Ellie Gonsalves posted a photograph of herself on Twitter wearing the sexy suit.


Sounds like the only folks with a problem were fellow prudes.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
32. I've noticed that it doesn't matter WHAT I *actually* say, some people will pretend I said what they
Wed Aug 8, 2012, 05:24 PM
Aug 2012

apparently want to hear.

That's part of the reason I shut down the other thread; because in addition to the fact that in my searches of DU2 I saw the ground had been extensively covered already, but also because it's incredibly apparent that, on a topic like that, if you do anything BUT NNYD to the whole thing, immediately you're, you know, defending elevator rape. And- this is rich- apparently just a "split hair away" from being an elevator rapist, yourself.



So, fuck that noise. I mean, really, enough. So my final words are in that thread if anyone cares to ACTUALLY read my thoughts on the subject; because time and time again, it has been proven that if this group does something like have universal agreement on a statement like "Daniel Tosh's rape joke was not okay", someone will immediately be off in another corner of DU saying

"WHY ARE THEY JUSTIFYING DANIEL TOSH'S RAPE JOKE IN THE MENS GROUP???"

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
21. Rice was slammed in 2010 after posting what was interpreted as a homophobic slur.
Wed Aug 8, 2012, 04:09 PM
Aug 2012

"Suck on that f----ts,"

again... read your OP and the article you posted and then claimed outrage. now you provide an article with more garbage. i was making a statement to your actual OP you posted. go figure.

 

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)
22. You said no one was pissed off by this picture except the OP
Wed Aug 8, 2012, 04:12 PM
Aug 2012

then it was pointed out that other people were indeed pissed off about this picture.

Can you acknowledge that your statement was incorrect in light of empirical evidence showing it to be false?

ProudToBeBlueInRhody

(16,399 posts)
25. Apparently all articles I post are "garbage"
Wed Aug 8, 2012, 04:24 PM
Aug 2012

Don't know how seabeyond defines that, but I'm guessing if it didn't pass her Google filter, that's what it is.

 

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)
26. I think she has me on ignore
Wed Aug 8, 2012, 04:26 PM
Aug 2012

as she flat out refuses to answer any question I pose to her.

Likely she is upset that people didn't just agree with her and will retreat to the HoF forum where dissenting views are quickly removed.

ProudToBeBlueInRhody

(16,399 posts)
31. Please don't mock this
Wed Aug 8, 2012, 04:39 PM
Aug 2012

If I want to stare or gaze at posts in utter confusion, trying to parse a coherent thread that explains why one would have made it in the first place, it is my law given right.

ProudToBeBlueInRhody

(16,399 posts)
23. Keep spinning and changing the subject
Wed Aug 8, 2012, 04:19 PM
Aug 2012

What does the slur have to do with what you're babbling about? You went from "defending" her to slamming her now?

She uses a stripper pole as a training tool, and I satirized it, minus any demand to watch her perform or making any sexual comments about her. I didn't even post that picture.

I suppose if I wanted to get over satirically with you, I should have advocated mass murder or castration or something.



Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
14. What if it is done for an audience? What if the person WANTS an audience?
Wed Aug 8, 2012, 03:15 PM
Aug 2012

What if they LIKE entertaining, or even -gasp!- turning on other people?

What then?

Oh, right, they're not allowed to, or they don't *really* like to; they've just been brainwashed to think they do.

And nowhere, anywhere, does it say only women can work out with a pole.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Men's Group»More proof The Patriarchy...