Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

unhappycamper

(60,364 posts)
Sun Dec 8, 2013, 07:06 AM Dec 2013

‘Free Trade’ a Serious Threat

http://watchingamerica.com/News/227667/free-trade-a-serious-threat/

‘Free Trade’ a Serious Threat
La Hora, Guatemala
By Centro de Colaboraciones Solidarias (Javier Caño Tamayo)
Translated By Miken Trogdon
5 December 2013
Edited by Gillian Palmer

~snip~

When something has leaked out, only the “great advantages of the treaty” have been mentioned. Increasing the GDP of the European Union by 1 percent, 110 billion Euros in European taxes, and $95 billion for the U.S. — these are macroeconomic calculations that never factor in negative working, social or environmental consequences.

In Latin America during the ‘90s, the U.S. wanted to establish a free trade zone with Central and South America. With the mantra that free trade enriches everything, that multilateral treaty (that was never adopted) consisted of imposing the neoliberal creed and measures of the Washington Consensus — policies for the benefit of the economic and financial elite.

So the U.S. negotiated and signed bilateral treaties with Colombia, Peru and Chile, and the treaty with Mexico and Canada. As the media testify, this last treaty had devastating consequences for the industrial and agricultural sectors in Mexico, provoked an intense and abundant migration to the U.S. and limited the possibilities for development in Mexico. It wasn’t much better for Peru, Colombia and Chile, who have not eliminated historic poverty and have seen their levels of inequality grow.

We have another record: The negotiation of the free trade treaty between the U.S. and 11 Pacific coastal countries, from Japan to New Zealand. WikiLeaks has obtained and published a rough copy of that Transpacific Association Treaty. It doesn’t look good. For starters, it expects Internet service providers to be police and judges that eliminate web content if they believe that it violates copyright laws — plus a type of international court in defense of said laws that will ignore sovereignty and national courts.
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
‘Free Trade’ a Serious Threat (Original Post) unhappycamper Dec 2013 OP
K&R.... daleanime Dec 2013 #1
For close to the first 100 years safeinOhio Dec 2013 #2
COSTLY trade agreements. grahamhgreen Dec 2013 #3
I disagree MannyGoldstein Dec 2013 #4
free trade mtasselin Dec 2013 #5
Renegotiate NAFTA! Enthusiast Dec 2013 #6

safeinOhio

(32,677 posts)
2. For close to the first 100 years
Sun Dec 8, 2013, 07:25 AM
Dec 2013

this country had no income tax. Government was paid for with duties on imported goods. That also grew our industries and put millions of people to work.

mtasselin

(666 posts)
5. free trade
Sun Dec 8, 2013, 09:37 AM
Dec 2013

Free trade my ass, this is just world corporations pitting one country against another who is going to do it for less. This is a spiral to the bottom where the corporations control the world, and my country is leading the way. This is not the hope and change I voted for, if I would have known.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Economy»‘Free Trade’ a Serious Th...