Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
Related: About this forum‘Free Trade’ a Serious Threat
http://watchingamerica.com/News/227667/free-trade-a-serious-threat/Free Trade a Serious Threat
La Hora, Guatemala
By Centro de Colaboraciones Solidarias (Javier Caño Tamayo)
Translated By Miken Trogdon
5 December 2013
Edited by Gillian Palmer
~snip~
When something has leaked out, only the great advantages of the treaty have been mentioned. Increasing the GDP of the European Union by 1 percent, 110 billion Euros in European taxes, and $95 billion for the U.S. these are macroeconomic calculations that never factor in negative working, social or environmental consequences.
In Latin America during the 90s, the U.S. wanted to establish a free trade zone with Central and South America. With the mantra that free trade enriches everything, that multilateral treaty (that was never adopted) consisted of imposing the neoliberal creed and measures of the Washington Consensus policies for the benefit of the economic and financial elite.
So the U.S. negotiated and signed bilateral treaties with Colombia, Peru and Chile, and the treaty with Mexico and Canada. As the media testify, this last treaty had devastating consequences for the industrial and agricultural sectors in Mexico, provoked an intense and abundant migration to the U.S. and limited the possibilities for development in Mexico. It wasnt much better for Peru, Colombia and Chile, who have not eliminated historic poverty and have seen their levels of inequality grow.
We have another record: The negotiation of the free trade treaty between the U.S. and 11 Pacific coastal countries, from Japan to New Zealand. WikiLeaks has obtained and published a rough copy of that Transpacific Association Treaty. It doesnt look good. For starters, it expects Internet service providers to be police and judges that eliminate web content if they believe that it violates copyright laws plus a type of international court in defense of said laws that will ignore sovereignty and national courts.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 1114 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (12)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
‘Free Trade’ a Serious Threat (Original Post)
unhappycamper
Dec 2013
OP
daleanime
(17,796 posts)1. K&R....
safeinOhio
(32,677 posts)2. For close to the first 100 years
this country had no income tax. Government was paid for with duties on imported goods. That also grew our industries and put millions of people to work.
grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)3. COSTLY trade agreements.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)4. I disagree
Free the trade has been @$!#ing awesome!
Season's greetings,
The Predator Class
mtasselin
(666 posts)5. free trade
Free trade my ass, this is just world corporations pitting one country against another who is going to do it for less. This is a spiral to the bottom where the corporations control the world, and my country is leading the way. This is not the hope and change I voted for, if I would have known.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)6. Renegotiate NAFTA!
And just say no to the TPP!