Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OrwellwasRight

(5,170 posts)
Sat Nov 5, 2016, 05:43 PM Nov 2016

Halloween’s Over but TPP Scare Tactics Aren’t

Halloween’s Over but TPP Scare Tactics Aren’t

http://www.aflcio.org/Blog/Political-Action-Legislation/Halloween-s-Over-but-TPP-Scare-Tactics-Aren-t

Excerpts:

Unable to convince voters that “trade deals” that make it easier to offshore jobs, drive down wages, and weaken consumer and environmental protections are good for them, advocates are trying to frighten members of Congress into betraying their constituents and voting for the TPP in the lame-duck session.

* * *

One tactic is to claim that failure to pass the TPP will make Americans less safe. The argument is not supported by any evidence whatsoever.

* * *

To the contrary, as retired Brigadier General John Adams has made clear, implementing the TPP could make the United States less safe, by weakening our economy—and our industrial base, in particular. In 2013, the Pentagon identified offshoring as a threat to national security, in part because it could compromise “the supply chain for key weapons systems components.”

* * *

Another tactic TPP supporters are using is to scare members of Congress into believing that the United States must pass the TPP or lose ground to China.

* * *

The myth falls apart once one looks behind the curtain. This myth ignores the very grave dangers of the TPP to U.S. jobs, wages and democracy. It also pretends that somehow the TPP gives the United States a leg up in competing against China—but TPP does the opposite. Its weak rules of origin will allow China to send goods to the United States duty-free as components of Japanese, Malaysian or Vietnamese products.

* * *

Please call your member of Congress before election day and tell him or her that your vote hinges on their vote on the TPP!!!

Share this blog post and ask a friend to call too! Thanks!

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Halloween’s Over but TPP Scare Tactics Aren’t (Original Post) OrwellwasRight Nov 2016 OP
Even some economists think the TPP is bad for the majority of wage-earners That Guy 888 Nov 2016 #1
Yep OrwellwasRight Nov 2016 #2
You are correct but... golfguru Nov 2016 #3
Not if we fight them. OrwellwasRight Nov 2016 #5
free trade sabbat hunter Nov 2016 #4
Sure "free" trade OrwellwasRight Nov 2016 #6
 

That Guy 888

(1,214 posts)
1. Even some economists think the TPP is bad for the majority of wage-earners
Sat Nov 5, 2016, 07:34 PM
Nov 2016
Rather than Dumping Unions, Democrats Could Shake Off Their Upscale Hard Core Anti-Market Stance
Published: 03 November 2016

This could start with abandoning their position, especially in trade deals, to make government granted patent and copyright monopolies longer and stronger. These anti-market interventions are affecting an ever larger share of the economy (in prescription drugs alone patent related protections likely increase the costs by more than $350 billion annually). They directly redistribute income from ordinary workers to the relatively wealthy minority in a position to earn rents from these forms of protectionism.

The Democrats can also abandon the licensing restrictions that protect doctors, dentists, and other highly paid professionals from both domestic and international competition. Our laws prevent doctors from practicing medicine unless they complete a U.S. residency program. This is about as blatant a protectionist barrier as you'll find these days. It allows doctors in the United States to earn on average more than $250,000 a year, twice as much as their counterparts in other wealthy countries like Germany and Canada. This protectionism costs us around $100 billion a year in higher medical costs.

We could also subject the financial sector to the same sort of taxes as other sectors of the economy pay (e.g. a financial transactions tax). This market based reform could eliminate more than $100 billion a year in waste in the financial sector that ends up as income for bankers and hedge fund types.

There is a long list of market-friendly measures that would help to reverse the upward redistribution of the last four decades. (Yep, this is the topic of my new book, Rigged: How Globalization and the Rules of the Modern Economy Were Structured to Make the Rich Richer.) Anyhow, supporters of this upward redistribution do their best to turn language on its head and deny that these forms of protectionism are protection. They pretend that patent and copyright protections are the free market or that they never heard of restrictions on foreign doctors. Unfortunately, this group of deniers includes most of the people who write on these issues. But, there is always hope that they can learn.


Blurb from his bookRigged How Globalization and the Rules of the Modern Economy Were Structured to Make the Rich Richer.: There has been an enormous upward redistribution of income in the United States in the last four decades. In his most recent book, Baker shows that this upward redistribution was not the result of globalization and the natural workings of the market. Rather it was the result of conscious policies that were designed to put downward pressure on the wages of ordinary workers while protecting and enhancing the incomes of those at the top. Baker explains how rules on trade, patents, copyrights, corporate governance, and macroeconomic policy were rigged to make income flow upward.

http://cepr.net/blogs/beat-the-press/



AMY GOODMAN: Let’s talk about this fifth anniversary of the collapse of Lehman Brothers, the beginning of the recession and who has profited in this last five years. It has certainly not been bad for everyone.

ROBERT REICH: Oh, no. In fact, Emmanuel Saez, my colleague at Berkeley who has really done the pioneering work on determining who’s got what and looked at income tax records, he’s just came out with a new study showing that since the recovery almost all the gains have gone to the very, very top. People who are in the top 1 percent are doing better than they did even before the Great Recession, better than they have done since 1928. Remember what happened after 1928: We had a great crash. Remember what happened after 2007, which was the last peak in terms of inequality: We had another crash. We can get back to why there is a relationship there, but most Americans are on a downward escalator. The median wage in the United States, adjusted for inflation, keeps on dropping.

AMY GOODMAN: You use the image of a suspension bridge to talk about inequality in the film.

ROBERT REICH: Because up until—this new study shows that 2012, actually, is the new peak. The old peaks were 1928 and 2007, which is interesting because in 1929 and 2008 we had crashes. And I think it’s not coincidental, because when so much of the nation’s income and wealth go to the top, the rest simply don’t have the purchasing power to keep the economy going at full employment.

AMY GOODMAN: Talk about what’s happened to everyone else.

ROBERT REICH: What’s happening to everybody else is not only wages eroding and a very large number of discouraged workers, who basically are never going to be able to find jobs, but economic insecurity. Most Americans today, even if they have jobs, even if the jobs pay fairly well, are much more insecure than Americans have ever been at work before, at least in living memory, because we have a huge number of contingent workers, huge number of part-time workers, huge number of workers who can’t know what their paychecks are going to be because they’re paid on a contingency fee—bonuses, you know, working hours, billable hours. That means that they cannot plan, and have to live, to some extent, from paycheck to paycheck. That insecurity, Amy, coupled with declining wages, coupled with more and more concentration of income and wealth at the very top, has led to a very—an economy that is very vulnerable and a democracy that is also very vulnerable, because all of that money at the top is being transformed into political power every day.



http://www.democracynow.org/2013/9/13/inequality_for_all_robert_reich_warns

OrwellwasRight

(5,170 posts)
2. Yep
Sat Nov 5, 2016, 08:37 PM
Nov 2016

Dean Baker of CEPR Josh Bivens and Rob Scott of EPI; Jared Bernstein, former member of the Council of Economic Advisers and advisor to VP Joe Biden; Nobel laureates Joe Stiglitz and Paul Krugman; former Secretary of Labor and reformed NAFTA champion, former executive editor of Global Business magazine Barry Lynn, Columbia U economist and special adviser to Ban Ki Moon all oppose the TPP.

That's a lot of economic firepower that Washington elites refuse to listen to. The administration should be embarrassed by its commitment to a deal that so blatantly advances the rights and privileges of global businesses at the expense of working people. No one needs more corporate power, yet that is what TPP delivers, wrapped in the flag and the gospel of neoliberalsim. I'm glad most Democrats in Congress will oppose it, but so far not enough of them have woken up to the economic destruction these kinds of corporate deals forge.

 

golfguru

(4,987 posts)
3. You are correct but...
Sun Nov 6, 2016, 11:28 AM
Nov 2016

trade deals like TPP enrich the mega donors of politicians in both parties.
So these deals will continue to be dumped on working Americans.

sabbat hunter

(6,828 posts)
4. free trade
Sun Nov 6, 2016, 01:40 PM
Nov 2016

can help the US, if the free trade is with countries that are economically on our level, like most of Europe, Canada, Japan, SK, Australia, NZ, Tawain, etc. Wages, cost of labor are fairly equal between us and those countries. With free trade in those areas, we can reduce costs of products in the US without costing jobs.
It is when you have trade deals with countries with unfair advantages, ie extremely low wages, etc. is when you run into problems.

I do think that TPP has some good points, like isolating China from the rest of the countries in the agreement, which will in the long term benefit us and the other countries involved. Tariffs on items made in the US would disappear in the countries that sign the agreement.
What isn't good is the IP parts of the agreement, whether the child labor, environmental protections can be properly enforced.

The TTIP has far more advantages for the US and will greatly benefit the US and our workers.

OrwellwasRight

(5,170 posts)
6. Sure "free" trade
Mon Nov 7, 2016, 01:25 AM
Nov 2016

has some benefits. But the TPP doesn't have very much "free" trade in it. It has mostly corporate privileges, such as extended monopoly rights for brand name drug companies, limitations on banking and food regulations, and a private justice system for foreign investors. All these things have risks that must be weighed against potential benefits of the deal.

Even Paul Krugman is a soft opponent, and he doesn't even mention or seem to understand the ISDS aspect (see http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/03/11/tpp-at-the-nabe/?_r=0 and http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/11/opinion/trade-and-tribulation.html, which is what puts former globalization cheerleaders Jeff Sachs and Joseph Stiglitz in the firm opposition camp as they see that corporations have shaped globalization for their own benefit).

Anyway, it is important to understand that the TPP does NOT isolate China, in any way, despite what opponents say.

1) For every TPP country, both the US and China are in their top five trading partners -- and China both exports more to and imports more from the non-North American TPP parties than the US does. Nothing in TPP will change that.

2) TPP ensures non-isolation of China through its weak rules of origin. For example, a car can be 55% (or more, due to various loopholes) Chinese and still get a zero tariff under the TPP. This ensures continued use of Chinese supply chains, and may even increase them.

3) China heavily lends to and gives international aid to its neighbors through initiatives such as the New Silk Road, the Maritime Silk Road, and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank. This builds friends and allies. The US does not such things. Our "foreign aid" program is largely limited to military aid and seeking privileges for our corporations. China's aggressive program ensures continued economic ties.

You can read all about how the TPP will not do what its supporters claim here: http://www.aflcio.org/content/download/156731/3897641/TPPChinaReport.pdf

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Economy»Halloween’s Over but TPP ...