French adults in their prime working years are more likely to have jobs than US Counterparts
>>>
It wasnt always that way. Back in the 1990s Europe really did have big problems with job creation; the phenomenon even received a catchy name, Eurosclerosis. And it seemed obvious what the problem was: Europes social safety net had, as Representative Paul Ryan likes to warn, become a hammock that undermined initiative and encouraged dependency.
But then a funny thing happened: Europe started doing much better, while America started doing much worse. Frances prime-age employment rate overtook Americas early in the Bush administration; at this point the gap in employment rates is bigger than it was in the late 1990s, this time in Frances favor. Other European nations with big welfare states, like Sweden and the Netherlands, do even better.
Now, young French citizens are still a lot less likely to have jobs than their American counterparts but a large part of that difference reflects the fact that France provides much more aid to students, so that they dont have to work their way through school. Is that a bad thing? Also, the French take more vacations and retire earlier than we do, and you can argue that the incentives for early retirement in particular are too generous. But on the core issue of providing jobs for people who really should be working, at this point old Europe is beating us hands down despite social benefits and regulations that, according to free-market ideologues, should be hugely job-destroying.
>>>
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/26/opinion/krugman-europes-secret-success.html?rref=opinion&module=Ribbon&version=context®ion=Header&action=click&contentCollection=Opinion&pgtype=article&_r=0