Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Rail Workers Revolt against Driving Solo
X post in Socialist-progressive
http://labornotes.org/2014/08/rail-workers-revolt-against-driving-solo
August 12, 2014 / Alexandra Bradbury
Railroaders are racing to put the brakes on a secret deal between their union officers and Warren Buffett's railroad. It would allow huge freight trains to rumble through towns across the western U.S. with just an engineer onboard, no conductor. Photo: Spouses & Families Against One Man Crews. - See more at: http://labornotes.org/2014/08/rail-workers-revolt-against-driving-solo#sthash.R7WnbrL4.dpuf
Theres a real rank-and-file rebellion going on right now, says Jen Wallis, a Seattle switchman-conductor for Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Railway. People whove never been involved in the union, never went to a union meeting, they are showing up and theyre joining Railroad Workers United in droves.
People are saying, We have to take action now to stop it. We cant let our union officers do this to us.
Whats all the fuss? On July 16, thousands of railroaders abruptly learned their union officers had held secret negotiations with BNSF, one of the countrys biggest freight carriers, and reached a deal to allow single-person train crews: a safety disaster.
Ballots on the tentative agreement went out in early August, and are due back in early September. If the vote goes up, huge freight trains could rumble through towns across the western U.S. with just an engineer onboard, no conductor.
- See more at: http://labornotes.org/2014/08/rail-workers-revolt-against-driving-solo#sthash.R7WnbrL4.dpuf
FULL story at link.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1082 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rail Workers Revolt against Driving Solo (Original Post)
Omaha Steve
Aug 2014
OP
roody
(10,849 posts)1. They need new leadership!
Brickbat
(19,339 posts)2. It's past time for the crafts to unite.
CatholicEdHead
(9,740 posts)3. Safety risk too high even with new technology
Part of the excuse for single-person crews is the coming of yet another new technology, positive train control, which Congress is mandating the rail carriers all adopt by 2015. This automated system will track trains speed and position, and apply the brakes in certain situations.
Railroaders call this tech advance a good thingbut as an additional boost to safety, not something youd want to rely on to replace a human. The railroad unions have been asking for PTC to be implemented as a safety overlay, not in place of a crew member, Wright says.
The article is correct, it is a additional safety measure, not meant as a employee replacement tool. The eventual model is probably drone-like trains with a centralized control center with nobody in the engines outside the switching yard.
BNSF's insurance company probably needs to do the study on safety/labor costs and it is much cheaper to have a second person and pay the labor costs. One major disaster and the conductors will return, cleanup costs and legal costs are much higher than labor costs on the train itself.
Railroaders call this tech advance a good thingbut as an additional boost to safety, not something youd want to rely on to replace a human. The railroad unions have been asking for PTC to be implemented as a safety overlay, not in place of a crew member, Wright says.
The article is correct, it is a additional safety measure, not meant as a employee replacement tool. The eventual model is probably drone-like trains with a centralized control center with nobody in the engines outside the switching yard.
BNSF's insurance company probably needs to do the study on safety/labor costs and it is much cheaper to have a second person and pay the labor costs. One major disaster and the conductors will return, cleanup costs and legal costs are much higher than labor costs on the train itself.