Shell Knew Scale Of Climate Threat In 1991, As Movie It Produced Shows - Guardian
Climate change at a rate faster than at any time since the end of the ice age change too fast perhaps for life to adapt, without severe dislocation. That was the startling warning issued by the oil giant Shell more than a quarter of a century ago. The companys farsighted 1991 film, titled Climate of Concern, set out with crystal clarity how the world was warming and that serious consequences could well result.
Tropical islands barely afloat even now, first made inhabitable (Ed. - sic), and then obliterated beneath the waves
coastal lowlands everywhere suffering pollution of precious groundwater, on which so much farming and so many cities depend, says the films narrator, over disturbing images of people affected by natural disasters and famine. In a crowded world subject to such adverse shifts of climate, who would take care of such greenhouse refugees?
EDIT
But Shells actions on global warming since 1991, such as major investments in highly polluting tar sands and lobbying against climate action, have been heavily criticised. In 2015, it was accused of behaving like a psychopath by the UKs former climate change envoy and of being engaged in a cynical attempt to block action on global warming. Even its own former group managing director, Sir Mark Moody-Stuart, said in 2015 it was distressing that remarkably little progress had been made on climate change by Shell and other oil companies.
The revelation of the film, obtained by the Correspondent, a Dutch online journalism platform, and shared with the Guardian, has renewed the criticism. The film shows that Shell understood that the threat was dire, potentially existential for civilisation, more than a quarter of a century ago, said Jeremy Leggett, a solar power entrepreneur and former geologist who had earlier researched shale deposits with Shell and BP funding. I see to this day how they doggedly argue for rising gas use, decades into the future, despite the clear evidence that fossil fuels have to be phased out completely, he said. I honestly feel that this company is guilty of a modern form of crime against humanity. They will point out that they have behaved no differently than their peers, BP, Exxon and Chevron. For people like me, of which there are many, that is no defence.
EDIT
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/feb/28/shell-film-warning-climate-change-rate-faster-than-end-ice-age