Lie After Lie After Lie - Pruitt's Confirmation Statements Vs. Current EPA Reality
EDIT
1. To recognize climate reality
Pruitt told Senators that EPAs conclusion that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases endanger human health and welfare needs to be enforced and respected and that there is nothing that I know that would cause a review at this point of this scientific conclusion. But now all the sudden, Pruitt is expressing deep doubts about EPAs rigorously substantiated conclusion.
2. To stand up for science
Pruitt also assured Senators that science must serve as the backbone of EPA actions. Yet just weeks later, hes expressing views on carbon pollution and climate change that directly contradict those of scientists at NASA, the National Academy of Science and every major American scientific organization all of which base their findings on decades of intensive, peer-review research and data.
3. To fight all forms of pollution
Pruitts misleading testimony isn't limited to climate pollution. In Senate testimony, he suddenly claimed concern about dangerous pollution like mercury, smog and methane, after building his political career by suing the EPA 14 times to block safeguards for these and other types of pollution. But his change of heart seems to have been brief. This week, at the request of companies that want looser pollution rules, Pruitt withdrew an EPA request for information about methane pollution from oil and gas drilling operations. This after claiming at his confirmation hearing that he was concerned about the impact of methane pollution. How genuine can that concern be if he doesn't even want companies to collect the information?
4. To enforce clean air and water rules
Pruitt claimed to want to restore the EPAs essential mission of keeping our air and our water clean and safe. But he and the White House are planning to recommend unprecedented cuts to the Agencys budget, which has already been cut by 20% in recent years. Now the Administration reportedly wants to cut it by another 24%, according to CNN. That wont save much money of every ten dollars the government spends, EPA gets two cents but it will severely damage programs that keep our air and water clean.
EDIT
http://time.com/4697551/epa-scott-pruitt-carbon-dioxide/