Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,527 posts)
Fri Mar 2, 2018, 11:45 PM Mar 2018

Mangrove deforestation releases more CO2 than Poland, study finds

by Morgan Erickson-Davis on 2 March 2018

  • A new study calculates that, worldwide, mangroves were storing 4.19 billion metric tons of carbon in 2012, representing a 2 percent loss since 2000. It estimates that number had dropped further to 4.16 billion metric tons by 2017.

  • In total, the study estimates that this lost carbon translates to as much as 317 million tons of CO2 emissions per year, equivalent to the annual emissions of around 67.5 million passenger vehicles in the U.S. and more than the 2015 emissions of Poland.

  • The researchers found Indonesia harbors the lion’s share of the world’s mangroves – around 30 percent – while also experiencing the biggest proportion of its 2000-2012 mangrove carbon loss, with deforestation there accounting for more than 48 percent of the global total. Other parts of Southeast Asia, such as Myanmar, are also undergoing high rates of mangrove deforestation, making the entire region a hotspot of global mangrove carbon loss.

  • Previous research estimates that between 30 and 50 percent of the world’s mangroves have been lost over the past 50 years. Deforestation for shrimp, rice and palm oil are among the biggest drivers of mangrove decline./ul]


More:
https://news.mongabay.com/2018/03/mangrove-deforestation-releases-more-co2-than-poland-study-finds/

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Mangrove deforestation releases more CO2 than Poland, study finds (Original Post) Judi Lynn Mar 2018 OP
When I read stuff like this I'm kinda flabbergasted at the seemingly much stronger focus ... mr_lebowski Mar 2018 #1
to say nothing of the loss KT2000 Mar 2018 #2
 

mr_lebowski

(33,643 posts)
1. When I read stuff like this I'm kinda flabbergasted at the seemingly much stronger focus ...
Sat Mar 3, 2018, 12:08 AM
Mar 2018

On 'reducing carbon output' as opposed to 'increasing (or at least CEASING to destroy)' our natural sinks that can store and sequester the Carbon we're spitting out.

We very well COULD maintain a similar lifestyle on this planet as the one we have now if we'd simply make a serious effort to 1) not destroy the friggin' photosynthetic capacity of our oceans, and 2) stop the friggin' deforestation and wetlands destruction, and instead heavily work in the direction of RE-forestation.

Of course to really succeed first we have to get a lot of drooling, knuckle-dragging, Faux-Watching MORONS from teh 'Right' ... along with the corrupt politicians they support ... onboard with the damn program.

The industrial/wealthy nations distributing free birth control and administering abortions ON DEMAND for all the poor parts world ... would also be pretty brilliant.

KT2000

(20,577 posts)
2. to say nothing of the loss
Sat Mar 3, 2018, 03:17 AM
Mar 2018

of habitat and the protection the land has had from storms, typhoons etc. Many of these forests are replaced by aquaculture farms. Used to love shrimp but anything other than the small Oregon shrimp they likely came from mangrove deforestation.

http://mangroveactionproject.org/

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Mangrove deforestation re...