Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumWiped out: America's love of luxury toilet paper is destroying Canadian forests
Major brands refusal to use sustainable materials is having a devastating impact on forests and climate, new report says
Sam Wolfson
Fri 1 Mar 2019 10.56 EST Last modified on Fri 1 Mar 2019 12.34 EST
. . .
But Americas heavy use of toilet paper particularly the pillowy soft kind is worsening climate change and taking a dramatic and irreversible toll on forests, especially the Canadian boreal forest, according to a new report by two major environmental groups, the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) and Stand.earth.
The boreal forest covers almost 60% of Canada and is home to 600 indigenous communities. Its huge size means it can absorb large amounts of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, the equivalent to the annual emissions of 24m cars each year.
The report found that major brands refusal to switch to sustainable materials in toilet paper is having a devastating impact on forests and climate. About 28m acres of Canadian boreal forest is cut down each year, an area the size of Pennsylvania. Virgin pulp, the key ingredient in toilet paper, accounted for 23% of Canadas forest product exports.
Americans are particularly to blame for this crisis. They make up just over 4% of the worlds population, yet account for more than 20% of global tissue consumption. The average four-person household in the US uses over 100lb of toilet paper a year.
More:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/mar/01/canada-boreal-forest-toilet-paper-us-climate-change-impact-report
progree
(10,907 posts)From Fortune Magazine -- https://finance.yahoo.com/news/average-american-uses-3-rolls-124011626.html
In the reports sustainability rankings, eco-friendly brands such as Seventh Generation and basic options from Whole Foods and Trader Joes earned an A.
But Cottonelle, Scott, Charmin, Ultra Soft, Angel Soft and Quilted Northern earned grades of D or F. Paper towel brands Viva, Brawny and Bounty also got grades of D or F.
The U.S. number (141 rolls per year) comes to 2.6 days per roll. 2.7 rolls per week, 11.8 rolls/month.
juxtaposed
(2,778 posts)DavidDvorkin
(19,477 posts)It suffers from the dreaded poke through.
msongs
(67,405 posts)PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,857 posts)About twenty years ago someone pushed me to Scott, and I've been with that brand ever since. Last week in Target in the toilet paper aisle, I saw a man clearly dithering over what to buy. So I recommended the Scott. Hope he finds it as good as I do.
defacto7
(13,485 posts)But it seems to be on the D to F grade list for some reason.
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,857 posts)I certainly haven't found that to be true.
Oh, and that awful ad for some brand of tissue that shows a baby bear with toilet paper all over his butt? I wonder exactly where people think they need to wipe.
defacto7
(13,485 posts)cagefreesoylentgreen
(838 posts)ETA: by prudish I mean remembering a trip to Europe put on by my conservative Christian school and the chaperones worrying if bidets would lead to kids pleasuring themselves. Cant have that, ya know! And sometimes I wonder if this is the same reason bidet use has never take off here.
Anyway, you can put a bidet attachment on your American toilet for as little as $30. Just look up bidet retrofit on your search engine of choice. All the toilets in the house Im building will have them.
samnsara
(17,622 posts)...as it spouts water all over your bum...
defacto7
(13,485 posts)Towels work if water droplets are a bother.
Duppers
(28,120 posts)We're about to begin construction on a new home and now would like to incorporate your idea. You're using the retrofit ones in your new home?
Thanks!!
NNadir
(33,518 posts)I learned about it in a wonderful little book called THE BIG NECESSITY: The Unmentionable World of Human Waste and Why It Matters
It's a wonderful examination of this issue, with deep insight and respect for engineering of sewer systems (and the problems paper causes in them), albeit written by a non-engineer.
About two billion people on this planet lack basic sanitation, and it represents a huge cost in terms of human disease and suffering.
I agree with you entirely. There is absolutely nothing wrong with a bidet or similar approach, a point Ms George makes in her book.
I think somehow it should be required reading in high schools, but as a culture we have a very squeamish and silly resistance to discussing basic truths.
KY_EnviroGuy
(14,491 posts)Like almost all products we use, paper goods involve production, transportation and disposal costs to our environment.
Pollution from paper mills, trucks and trains that transports it and the environmental costs from sewage treatment are some of the many additional things that affect our health and planet.
It's also a shame is that this virgin pulp fiber will never be recycled.
samnsara
(17,622 posts)Especially if it doesn't disintegrate upon contact with the remnants clinging to my body parts!
OKIsItJustMe
(19,938 posts)defacto7
(13,485 posts)we had a pile of used corn cobs, and I didn't complain!