Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumShitstain Thwarts GOP Plot To Pretend His Climate Agenda Isn't Idiotic
EDIT
Republican operatives can read these tea leaves. They understand their party can simultaneously accept the science of climate change and privilege Big Oils short-term interests over humanitys long-term survival. After all, thats what just about every other center-right party on earth is already doing. So in recent months, Republicans have begun flirting with the talk loudly, but dont carry a big stick approach to climate policy that so many voters ostensibly want. As the New York Times reported in April:
Denying the basic existence of climate change is no longer a credible position, said Whit Ayers, a Republican political consultant, pointing out the growing climate concern among millennials as well as centrist voters two groups the G.O.P. will need in the future. In recent weeks, Senator John Cornyn of Texas an oil state where climate denial runs deep said he is helping write legislation to reduce emissions through energy innovation. Senator Lamar Alexander of Tennessee said he wants to create a Manhattan Project for clean energy funding. Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska is exploring bipartisan plans to curb emissions from her position as chair of the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. And Representative Matthew Gaetz of Florida, who once called to abolish the Environmental Protection Agency, introduced legislation to tackle climate change by encouraging nuclear energy and hydropower, as well as carbon capture technology, which aims to pull planet-warming carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere.
Some of these proposals would be better than nothing. None are commensurate with the scale of the climate crisis. Most important, the GOPs congressional leadership has evinced no serious interest in passing any of them. But all of the proposals do help Republicans shift the terms of debate over climate change in a more favorable direction. Instead of having an argument over whether the public should believe coal barons or their own lying thermometers on the subject of global warming, the GOPs performative acceptance of climate science allows it to a pick a fight over whether the solution to the crisis should involve raising taxes or gas prices.
But Donald Trump refuses to transition to cleaner, more sustainable talking points. Rather, on climate, the president insists on putting his partys dumbest face forward. Not content to merely accelerate warming through its policies, the Trump administration is adding insult to ecological injury. At a meeting of the Arctic Council this month, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo refused to sign on to a joint statement affirming the necessity of protecting the Arctic region from the threat of rapidly melting ice unless all mentions of climate change were stripped from the document. Pompeo further horrified his fellow diplomats by suggesting that climate change is actually good for the Arctic, since melting ice caps are opening up new shipping routes and thus making it more economically viable to expand oil drilling in the region.
Pompeos climate change isnt a big deal, but if it was, that would be awesome position is shared by William Happer, the 79-year-old physicist who serves on Trumps National Security Council. Happer has said repeatedly, in public, that the demonization of carbon dioxide is just like the demonization of the poor Jews under Hitler. He further argues that humanity has actually been suffering through a CO2 famine, which the fossil-fuel industry has been heroically combating.
EDIT
http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/05/trump-climate-denier-william-happer-co2-jews-science.html