Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hatrack

(59,584 posts)
Mon Jul 1, 2019, 08:39 AM Jul 2019

Must . . . Have . . . PHOOONNNE!!! NPS Preparing 62 Miles Of Cable, 9 Towers In Grand Teton NP

At Mount Rainier National Park in Washington state, park officials plan to hide their new cellular equipment in an attic. At Sequoia National Park in California, a new 138-foot cell tower will be out in the open, but park officials want to disguise it to look like a huge pine tree. And at Grand Teton National Park in Wyoming, in perhaps the biggest digital expansion of all, park officials ignited a controversy with their plan to install new towers at nine sites, along with 62 miles of high-speed fiber-optic cable, near the park's main roads.

With no nationwide policy to guide them, officials at the National Park Service's 419 sites are finding all sorts of ways to increase their digital connections, hoping to lure more younger visitors. Supporters say it boosts safety and interest in visiting parks.

But critics say it's a big mistake and actually ensures that children will feel more disconnected from nature in the long run. "People should have a right to a no-Wi-Fi zone — there should be places where we're not in contact and reachable," said Richard Louv, a California author of "Last Child in the Woods: Saving Our Children from Nature-Deficit Disorder."

Louv acknowledged that he appears to be on the losing end of the argument with park officials, but he said people should be taught "that connecting to other life is more important than collecting your email." "The big problem is the lack of focus on nature as media, that nature itself is a network, a connection that is every bit as important — and I believe more important — than our electronic connections," he said.

EDIT

https://www.eenews.net/greenwire/2019/06/28/stories/1060641217

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Must . . . Have . . . PHOOONNNE!!! NPS Preparing 62 Miles Of Cable, 9 Towers In Grand Teton NP (Original Post) hatrack Jul 2019 OP
I live within an hour of two 2naSalit Jul 2019 #1
I know how to shut mine off RainCaster Jul 2019 #2
Jeez Bayard Jul 2019 #3

2naSalit

(86,577 posts)
1. I live within an hour of two
Mon Jul 1, 2019, 09:13 AM
Jul 2019

NPs that are adding so much digital access that I won't even go to them anymore and I moved here a few decades ago because it used to be remote.

Fuck it. Too crowded with idiots any more. As if it wasn't bad enough when tourists, aka "swivelheads" put wildlife in their car to keep them warm and take selfies right in front of an animal that could kill them...

And they can't drive if they are above 5K ft above sea level, not enough oxygen for their brains, I guess. I can't wait until tourism loses more of its appeal to those who would jump in their car in a low elevation location in their tanktops and flipflops, drive for a day or two and then wonder why there isn't a walmart at the entrance; or bring a carload of small kids to Yellowstone with NO PLANS and think you can just arrive at sunset and go hike a few feet up a trail and pitch a tent. Seriously, this happens a lot.

Now they want wifi every fucking where... why not just stay home? You can look at pictures of what you paid a pretty penny to ignore on your fone that you can't put down so why waste the time and money to bother to go there and foul the air with your disrespect for nature.

Bayard

(22,062 posts)
3. Jeez
Mon Jul 1, 2019, 10:36 AM
Jul 2019

So kids can stay in their cabins and play video games instead of discovering nature. Defeats the purpose of going to these wondrous sites.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Must . . . Have . . . PHO...