Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumMust . . . Have . . . PHOOONNNE!!! NPS Preparing 62 Miles Of Cable, 9 Towers In Grand Teton NP
At Mount Rainier National Park in Washington state, park officials plan to hide their new cellular equipment in an attic. At Sequoia National Park in California, a new 138-foot cell tower will be out in the open, but park officials want to disguise it to look like a huge pine tree. And at Grand Teton National Park in Wyoming, in perhaps the biggest digital expansion of all, park officials ignited a controversy with their plan to install new towers at nine sites, along with 62 miles of high-speed fiber-optic cable, near the park's main roads.
With no nationwide policy to guide them, officials at the National Park Service's 419 sites are finding all sorts of ways to increase their digital connections, hoping to lure more younger visitors. Supporters say it boosts safety and interest in visiting parks.
But critics say it's a big mistake and actually ensures that children will feel more disconnected from nature in the long run. "People should have a right to a no-Wi-Fi zone there should be places where we're not in contact and reachable," said Richard Louv, a California author of "Last Child in the Woods: Saving Our Children from Nature-Deficit Disorder."
Louv acknowledged that he appears to be on the losing end of the argument with park officials, but he said people should be taught "that connecting to other life is more important than collecting your email." "The big problem is the lack of focus on nature as media, that nature itself is a network, a connection that is every bit as important and I believe more important than our electronic connections," he said.
EDIT
https://www.eenews.net/greenwire/2019/06/28/stories/1060641217
2naSalit
(86,577 posts)NPs that are adding so much digital access that I won't even go to them anymore and I moved here a few decades ago because it used to be remote.
Fuck it. Too crowded with idiots any more. As if it wasn't bad enough when tourists, aka "swivelheads" put wildlife in their car to keep them warm and take selfies right in front of an animal that could kill them...
And they can't drive if they are above 5K ft above sea level, not enough oxygen for their brains, I guess. I can't wait until tourism loses more of its appeal to those who would jump in their car in a low elevation location in their tanktops and flipflops, drive for a day or two and then wonder why there isn't a walmart at the entrance; or bring a carload of small kids to Yellowstone with NO PLANS and think you can just arrive at sunset and go hike a few feet up a trail and pitch a tent. Seriously, this happens a lot.
Now they want wifi every fucking where... why not just stay home? You can look at pictures of what you paid a pretty penny to ignore on your fone that you can't put down so why waste the time and money to bother to go there and foul the air with your disrespect for nature.
RainCaster
(10,869 posts)Really.
So kids can stay in their cabins and play video games instead of discovering nature. Defeats the purpose of going to these wondrous sites.