Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumPutin Pimps 2060 Net-Zero Plan Which Depends On Russia's Forests Absorbing More Carbon Then They Can
Even as large swaths of the Siberian forest have burned during summer wildfires made increasingly worse by climate change the Kremlins strategy to slash emissions is a bet on those same trees. President Vladimir Putin announced earlier this month that Russia will strive for carbon neutrality by 2060 its most ambitious climate goal.
But how Russia plans to accomplish that has been met with criticism and skepticism. Putin claimed earlier this year that Russias vast territory, especially its forests, could neutralize several billion [metric] tons of carbon dioxide emissions a figure climatologists say is unrealistic and undermines the viability of his carbon-neutrality pledge.
EDIT
The statements Russia makes at [the U.N. climate conference] can often be considered as window dressing, said Anna Korppoo, a research professor at Norways Fridtjof Nansen Institute, specializing in Russias climate policy. You have to say that youre doing something, she added, but then theres the other question of whether that something is concrete. Its not enough, she noted, to make pledges by simply recalculating how much carbon a forest absorbs. Russia has long faced criticism for setting weak climate targets and not doing more to curb the carbon footprint of its massive fossil fuel industry. Experts at the Climate Action Tracker, which monitors countries climate promises, rate Russias 2030 target under the Paris climate agreement as highly insufficient.
EDIT
To meet a Putin goal of reducing Russias carbon emissions to below the E.U.s level by 2050, Russias Ministry of Economic Development outlined four strategies in a draft proposal seen by The Washington Post. Three of the scenarios hinge on Russias ecosystems forests, tundra, swamps and more absorbing at least 1 billion tons of carbon dioxide in 30 years, double what they do now, according to most studies. Putin insists the number can be as high as 2.5 billions tons of carbon dioxide.
EDIT
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/russia-carbon-cop26-forests/2021/10/26/a5b8948c-2860-11ec-8739-5cb6aba30a30_story.html
exboyfil
(17,862 posts)The thing about that is the environment doesn't get a s__t.
hatrack
(59,584 posts).
SergeStorms
(19,200 posts)alarmingly like republican bullshit.
You don't suppose they could be sharing tips on how to "govern", do you?