Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

limpyhobbler

(8,244 posts)
Thu Jun 28, 2012, 06:28 PM Jun 2012

STUDY: Kardashians Get 40 Times More News Coverage Than Ocean Acidification

Carbon dioxide emissions are not just warming up our atmosphere, they're also changing the chemistry of our oceans. This phenomenon is known as ocean acidification, or sometimes as global warming's "evil twin" or the "osteoporosis of the sea." Scientists have warned that it poses a serious threat to ocean life. Yet major American news outlets covered the Kardashians over 40 times more often than ocean acidification over the past year and a half.



Rising carbon dioxide emissions have caused the oceans to become around 30 percent more acidic since the Industrial Revolution, and if we do not lower the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere, the ocean surface could be up to 150 percent more acidic by 2100. At that level, the shells of some plankton would dissolve, large parts of the ocean would become inhospitable to coral reef growth, and the rapidity of the change could threaten much of the marine food web. According to the National Research Council, the chemical changes are taking place "at an unprecedented rate and magnitude" and are "practically irreversible on a time scale of centuries."

Despite a boom of recent scientific research documenting this threat, there has been a blackout on the topic at most media outlets. Since the end of 2010, ABC, NBC and Fox News have completely ignored ocean acidification, and the Los Angeles Times, USA TODAY, Wall Street Journal, MSNBC, CNN and CBS have barely mentioned it at all.

While most coverage described the basic scientific phenomenon or listed ocean acidification as a serious environmental challenge, the Wall Street Journal dismissed the problem. All three mentions of ocean acidification from the Journal were from columns that downplayed the threat—there was not a single straight news article interviewing scientists. One of those columns was a full article devoted to distorting and cherry-picking the science on ocean acidification. The Journal also published a letter to the editor (not counted in this study) from the Competitive Enterprise Institute’s Chris Horner who summarily dismissed ocean acidification as “the latest nominee to supplant troubled CO2-warming theory.” But the threat is nothing to shake off.


...

more: http://mediamatters.org/blog/201206270006
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
STUDY: Kardashians Get 40 Times More News Coverage Than Ocean Acidification (Original Post) limpyhobbler Jun 2012 OP
Just exactly the way today's corporate media wants it. n/t cyberpj Jun 2012 #1
So throw the Kardashians into the ocean and watch them slowly dissolve... nt LiberalEsto Jun 2012 #2
DUzy, + one googol zillion, AND a gold star! Systematic Chaos Jun 2012 #5
Porn vs Problems Bill USA Jun 2012 #3
Maybe they have talent? demosincebirth Jun 2012 #4
New rule: XemaSab Jun 2012 #6
what exactly are they famous for? gejohnston Jun 2012 #7
Dunno, but I used to think they were enemy aliens from Star Trek LiberalEsto Jun 2012 #8
One has an ass so big the others live inside it like hobbits NickB79 Jun 2012 #9
So like the Ocean is tripping on acid? That is like so far out! Bosso 63 Jun 2012 #10
 

LiberalEsto

(22,845 posts)
8. Dunno, but I used to think they were enemy aliens from Star Trek
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 09:14 AM
Jun 2012

You know, like the Cardassians, Ferengi, Borg, Klingons...

It's a pity the Kardashians don't have a permanent, one-way Cloaking Device.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»STUDY: Kardashians Get 40...