Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

XemaSab

(60,212 posts)
Wed Aug 1, 2012, 11:02 PM Aug 2012

Are Butterflies Two Different Animals in One? The Death And Resurrection Theory

Here's a dangerous, crazy thought from an otherwise sober (and very eminent) biologist, Bernd Heinrich. He's thinking about moths and butterflies, and how they radically change shape as they grow, from little wormy, caterpillar critters to airborne beauties. Why, he wondered, do these flying animals begin their lives as wingless, crawling worms? Baby ducks have wings. Baby bats have wings. Why not baby butterflies?

His answer — and I'm quoting him here — knocked me silly.

"[T]he radical change that occurs," he says, "does indeed arguably involve death followed by reincarnation."

What?

http://www.npr.org/blogs/krulwich/2012/08/01/157718428/are-butterflies-two-different-animals-in-one-the-death-and-resurrection-theory

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Are Butterflies Two Different Animals in One? The Death And Resurrection Theory (Original Post) XemaSab Aug 2012 OP
arguably, that is correct RobertEarl Aug 2012 #1
if it were inactive or dead, it would not become a butterfly. notadmblnd Aug 2012 #3
You would kill butterflies? RobertEarl Aug 2012 #4
Made me think. Seriously. Xipe Totec Aug 2012 #2
We also begin as worm-like creatures appal_jack Aug 2012 #5
Always remember... Scootaloo Aug 2012 #6
Yes, I tend to agree. GliderGuider Aug 2012 #7
autolysis phantom power Aug 2012 #8
And this... GliderGuider Aug 2012 #9
Seeds RobertEarl Aug 2012 #10
 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
1. arguably, that is correct
Wed Aug 1, 2012, 11:28 PM
Aug 2012

The caterpillar dies or at least goes into a state of something like rigor-mortis in cocoon. Then after a time of inactivity morphs into the butterfly.

notadmblnd

(23,720 posts)
3. if it were inactive or dead, it would not become a butterfly.
Wed Aug 1, 2012, 11:39 PM
Aug 2012

Now if I were to step on and mash a cocoon, then it most certainly would not become a butterfly because it would be dead. If it did become a butterfly after being mashed into worm juice, then it would truly be resurrection

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
4. You would kill butterflies?
Thu Aug 2, 2012, 12:07 AM
Aug 2012

Heh. <smile>

Re-organizing the established parameters of said butterfly-in-waiting would be an external force unable to be overcome.

The idea here is metamorphism in its natural state which in relativity to other life forms has an appearance of death and resurrection.

I can think of no other specie which grows in such a way.
True, dragonflies and the like do start off as macro-invertebrates but their adult forms take shape within the confines of their immature bodies.

 

appal_jack

(3,813 posts)
5. We also begin as worm-like creatures
Thu Aug 2, 2012, 12:44 AM
Aug 2012

We also begin as worm-like creatures, but we are in our mothers' wombs at the time. Is birth also a form of resurrection?

Of course, some humanoid creatures, such as Mitt Romney and Dick Cheney, retain many of their wormy characteristics later into life.

-app

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
6. Always remember...
Thu Aug 2, 2012, 01:18 AM
Aug 2012

Insects (arthropods in general, but especially insects) art the most advanced, most successful branch of life on this world. The forms they have evolved make some of our modern technology look like it's still made of sticks and wood by comparison. Any outside observer would have to conclude that these critters are the dominant form of multicellular life on this planet... And unlike many others they are in no risk of ever dying out in full.

We are nothing but clumsy land-fish still trying to figure out how to deal with the dangers of, you know, locomotion.

 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
7. Yes, I tend to agree.
Thu Aug 2, 2012, 09:33 AM
Aug 2012

Caterpillars undergo a process of autolysis (self-digestion) in the pupa, that reduces them to a liquid soup. In that soup are special cells called "imaginal" cells (probably a kind of stem cell) that seed the development of the butterfly. It's very much a death and resurrection process.

Some spiritually inclined environmentalists (me among them) see this process as a metaphor for what we hope will happen to humanity during and after the coming collapse of civilization and world population.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
10. Seeds
Thu Aug 2, 2012, 11:36 PM
Aug 2012

Take a seed. It morphs from one thing to another.

May be caterpillars are just the seed for a butterfly?

How about eggs? Do they not go from one form and morph into another?

All this activity is what could even be called the God particle at work?

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Are Butterflies Two Diffe...