Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

wtmusic

(39,166 posts)
Tue Oct 30, 2012, 07:15 PM Oct 2012

Nuclear Plants Get Through the Storm With Little Trouble



"The nuclear reactors in Sandy’s path mostly handled the storm well — better than other parts of the region’s electric system.

But one reactor, on the New Jersey coast, declared a low-level emergency because rising water threatened to submerge pumps it uses to pull in cooling water.

That plant, Oyster Creek, in Toms River, about 60 miles east of Philadelphia, had shut a week earlier for refueling, but still had cooling requirements, especially for its spent fuel pool, where fuel used decades ago is stored; that fuel must be kept submerged, and continues to generate waste heat."

http://green.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/10/30/nuclear-plants-get-through-the-storm-with-little-trouble/
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Nuclear Plants Get Through the Storm With Little Trouble (Original Post) wtmusic Oct 2012 OP
This is one of those times when as little trouble mindwalker_i Oct 2012 #1
Let, at least, the people pay attention to the 'spent fuel' problem: Ghost Dog Oct 2012 #2
There are much safer places for it to go. wtmusic Oct 2012 #3
 

Ghost Dog

(16,881 posts)
2. Let, at least, the people pay attention to the 'spent fuel' problem:
Wed Oct 31, 2012, 11:27 AM
Oct 2012

Piling up since decades ago,now. sTILL NO SAFE SOLUTION. nO SAFE PLACE TO GO.

Ok. Sorry. I'll leave those accidental CAPS where they are.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Nuclear Plants Get Throug...