state's 'environmentally sound' assessment done by firms linked to transcanada, exxon, bp, kochs

[xchrom]

http://www.nationofchange.org/state-s-environmentally-sound-keystone-assessment-done-firms-linked-transcanada-exxon-mobil-bp-and-k

Yesterday, we found out via Inside Climate News and Brad Johnson over at Grist that the environmental impact statement the State Department just released on the Keystone XL pipeline was written by a private consulting firm being paid by the pipeline’s owner.

This obviously raises concerns about conflicts of interest with the report itself, but it also highlights the problems with turning government work and analysis over to private firms with possible financial ties to other private entities who may be affected by that work and analysis — a phenomenon that’s been underway since the 1990s.

State’s report, which found that the pipeline was “unlikely to have a substantial impact on the rate of development in the oil sands,” and will “not likely result in significant adverse environmental effects,” was written by Environmental Resources Management (ERM). Several years ago, Cardno Entrix, another private consultancy, was contracted by TransCanada to handle the State Department’s initial draft of the environmental impact statement, the Department’s hearings on the pipeline, and even its Keystone XL website.

[hedda_foil]

1. This kind of idiocy seems to be the direct result of outsourcing government services.

Honestly, what are the odds of an environmental impact study not being done by an . Industry-friendly company if the expertise isn't maintained in house?

[Jackpine Radical]

2. Ergo it's not idiocy that created the policy.

It's something more akin to psychopathy.

The benefits of outsourcing are virtually endless; no wonder the Republicans (and a whole lot of Dems) like the idea so much.

[mountain grammy]

3. Oh, but I'm sure they were objective! Ha, NOT!

[limpyhobbler]

4. k&r