Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumHanford Nuclear Cleanup May Be Too Dangerous, Future Of Storage Plant Uncertain
The most toxic and voluminous nuclear waste in the U.S.208 million liters sits in decaying underground tanks at the Hanford Site (a nuclear reservation) in southeastern Washington State. It accumulated there from the middle of World War II, when the Manhattan Project invented the first nuclear weapon, to 1987, when the last reactor shut down. The federal governments current attempt at a permanent solution for safely storing that waste for centuriesthe Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant herehas hit a major snag in the form of potential chain reactions, hydrogen explosions and leaks from metal corrosion. And the revelation last February that six more of the storage tanks are currently leaking has further ramped up the pressure for resolution.
After decades of research, experimentation and political inertia, the U.S. Department of Energy (DoE) started building the Vit Plant at Hanford in 2000. Its intended to sequester the waste in stainless steelencased glass logs, a process known as vitrification (hence Vit), so it cannot escape into the environment, barring natural disasters like earthquakes or catastrophic fires. But progress on the plant slowed to a crawl last August, when numerous interested parties acknowledged that the plants design might present serious safety risks. In response, then-Energy Secretary Steven Chu appointed an expert panel to find a way forward. Because 60 of the 177 underground tanks have already leaked and all are at increasing risk to do so, solving the problem is urgent.
snip
And then theres the extreme radioactivity of the waste, which is far too high for direct human exposure. Enter the Vit Plants notorious black cells. These are 18 massive concrete enclosures populated by smaller stainless steel vessels. The idea is to guide the waste through the vessels without any human intervention over the 40 years officials believe it will take to process all the waste. The only way to do this is to ensure that the black cells have no moving parts. But because the waste has to be constantly stirred to prevent settling of the noxious and radioactive solids, the plan calls for pulse jet mixersdescribed as turkey bastersto keep the solids suspended.
The pulse jet mixers suck waste into their vertical tubes and then eject it forcefully back into the tanks. Unfortunately, they have not yet been shown to provide sufficient mixing at the scale necessary for the Vit Plant. They do, however, apply enough force to the slurry for the solids to grind away at the stainless steel of tanks and pipes, weakening them enough to risk leakage. Besides this erosion, theres also potential for chemical corrosion. The Defense Nuclear Safety Board, which advises the White House, has called these problems a show-stopper.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/09/hanford-nuclear-cleanup-too-dangerous_n_3246263.html?utm_hp_ref=green
madokie
(51,076 posts)I'm sure there is a difference in this waste and what is the by product of the present 100 plus nuclear power plants but how can it be considered a wise choice to continue to create this very dangerous waste
WTF
pscot
(21,024 posts)Nothing's changed. It's been a corporate cash cow for 50 years. If they've spent a nickel they've spent a Trillion$, and they can't fix the problem. Fukushima promises the same kind of longevity. Maybe the Russians have the right idea; cover the whole meghila wth cement and walk away.
hunter
(38,311 posts)"Cleaning up" Hanford is a cash cow for the same sorts of politically connected firms that profit so greatly from our defense industry.
Fear is transformed into corporate profits.
I'm not saying I have a better way to clean up this mess, only that I'm not at all confident anyone was ever interested in a solution that made sense.
The goal of any corporation is to win the contracts, not to find an optimal solution to the problem.
pscot
(21,024 posts)A 3 generation boondoggle.
quadrature
(2,049 posts)Ok.
why can't they get rid of the liquid?
madokie
(51,076 posts)Inquiring minds would like to know
LiberalEsto
(22,845 posts)quadrature
(2,049 posts)the sludge is the radioactive part.
--> evaporate the water away,
and concentrate effort on the sludge
kristopher
(29,798 posts)After all, it is working so well for Tepco.
quadrature
(2,049 posts)for example, some people do not
want rad waste permanently stored
in their state
kristopher
(29,798 posts)...your "simple" contribution to the solution isn't as simple as it sounds. Maligning the motives of those trying to solve the intractable legacies of the nuclear industry may be a favorite tactic, but it is unlikely to be the actual cause of the persistence of the problems.
madokie
(51,076 posts)seems as they're toying with the idea of what to do with what they're calling radioactive water that is seeping in to their melted down plants.
I'm not so sure you know what you're saying here as it seems to be contrary to what I read concerning what is going on in Japan right now. As it stands right now I call B,S,