Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Beringia

(4,316 posts)
Sat Aug 31, 2013, 04:02 PM Aug 2013

Michigan Wolf Hunt Based on False Information and Poor Farm Stewardship






The hunt starts Nov 15, 2013

LANSING, Mich. – Poor animal care and negligent behavior on one Upper Peninsula farm skewed statistics used by the Michigan Department of Natural Resources to push for a wolf hunting season in Michigan, according to information revealed through the Freedom of Information Act. February 2013 documents reveal the alarming details of a DNR investigation into a Matchwood farm, in Ontonagon County, owned by John Koski that was used as a major justification for the 2013 wolf hunting season.

The investigation noted that Koski failed to use nearly $4,000 of non-lethal wolf deterrence methods, including fencing and donkeys, which the DNR provided to him free of charge. In fact, a DNR investigator and accompanying veterinarian found that Koski allowed two of the donkeys to die and a third was removed because of extremely poor health due to lack of care. The DNR also found that Koski failed to provide proper care and water for his own cattle and left carcasses on his property to attract predators, in violation of the state’s Bodies of Dead Animals Act.

“One negligent farmer who refused to use the fences and guard donkeys given to him for free by the state cannot be held up as the poster child for Michigan’s wolf hunt,” said Jill Fritz, director of Keep Michigan Wolves Protected. “The true intent of the wolf hunt in Michigan has nothing to do with livestock conflicts. It is purely to satisfy a vocal minority who just want a trophy hunt.”

In the spring of 2013, the DNR submitted a proposal for a wolf hunt in three Wolf Management Units, or WMUs, in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula. According to the DNR, the objective of a wolf hunt in WMU B, which includes Ontonagon, Baraga and parts of Houghton counties, is “…to reduce the number of chronic livestock depredations” by targeting 19 wolves.

The “chronic livestock depredations” that the DNR is referring to in WMU B mainly occurred on Koski’s farm.

An examination of DNR statistics of confirmed livestock losses due to wolves in WMU B reveals that an astoundingly high percentage in recent years occurred on the Koski farm. Within WMU B during the period of 2010 to 2013:

73 percent (57 of 78) of wolf conflicts with livestock have occurred on the Koski farm;

80 percent (96 of 120) of individual livestock confirmed killed by wolves have been on the Koski farm;

82 percent ($32,936 of $40,098.51) of all compensation for livestock lost to wolves has gone to the Koski farm; and

64.4 percent (96 of 149) of the cattle killed by wolves in the entire U.P. in the past 3 years have been on the Koski farm.

If this one irresponsible farmer is removed from the overall statistics of confirmed wolf losses on livestock in the area of WMU B in the past 3 years, the actual amount of livestock losses due to wolves is minimal and cannot justify a wolf hunt. Since 2010, Koski’s farm was one of only 11 U.P. farms that experienced any confirmed wolf losses. The few isolated remaining incidents of wolves taking livestock can be—and are already—managed through non-lethal measures and individually-directed lethal control of problem wolves under existing state law. What’s more, so far in 2013, not one farm in WMU B has experienced a confirmed wolf loss.

“It’s already legal in Michigan to kill problem wolves in the rare instances when livestock or pets are threatened,” added Fritz. “Hunters won’t be targeting problem wolves, but randomly killing animals in national forests and other wilderness areas.”


http://keepwolvesprotected.com/media/upcoming-michigan-wolf-hunt-based-false-information-and-poor-farm-stewardship

http://www.miningjournal.net/page/content.detail/id/590195.html
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Michigan Wolf Hunt Based on False Information and Poor Farm Stewardship (Original Post) Beringia Aug 2013 OP
And the root of the problem in the first place, rearing its ugly head again Hydra Aug 2013 #1
Post removed Post removed Aug 2013 #2
Kick for the corruption inherent in the system Nihil Sep 2013 #3
How the hell does someone who can't even keep a donkey alive... hunter Sep 2013 #4
Good to hear Beringia Sep 2013 #5
Ask my parents. hunter Sep 2013 #6
thanks, interesting nt Beringia Sep 2013 #7

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
1. And the root of the problem in the first place, rearing its ugly head again
Sat Aug 31, 2013, 04:32 PM
Aug 2013

Irresponsible behavior. We can't leave an ecosystem alone because someone, somewhere can't grasp the fact that we need to have an ecosystem outside the human one.

Response to Beringia (Original post)

 

Nihil

(13,508 posts)
3. Kick for the corruption inherent in the system
Mon Sep 2, 2013, 06:53 AM
Sep 2013

> “One negligent farmer who refused to use the fences and guard donkeys given to him
> for free by the state cannot be held up as the poster child for Michigan’s wolf hunt,”
> ...
> “The true intent of the wolf hunt in Michigan has nothing to do with livestock conflicts.
> It is purely to satisfy a vocal minority who just want a trophy hunt.

And yet it is the wolf that loses out as a result of this one farmer's repeated fraud.

I wouldn't recommend shooting anyone but would cheerfully celebrate that particular farmer's demise
as he has not only stolen ~$33k from the taxpayers but has provided the limp penis brigade an excuse
to pointlessly slaughter even more wolves. I would rather one single wolf live to old age than ten of his ilk.



hunter

(38,311 posts)
4. How the hell does someone who can't even keep a donkey alive...
Mon Sep 2, 2013, 03:53 PM
Sep 2013

... make any money farming or raising cattle??? Donkeys are tough.

Seriously, the Feds ought to be looking for a meth lab or something on Koski's "farm."

I can't even shoot feral pigs and those fuckers are a destructive non-native pest.

What's with people who want to shoot bears, mountain lions, wolves, or coyotes? Without them the deer, rodents, and rabbits would eat everything.

Maybe I could shoot an animal if it was causing me serious trouble, but it would only be after I'd exhausted all other options, or it had rabies, and I'd still feel bad about that.

I'm not hypocritical about hunting deer and such for food, even feral pigs, I occasionally eat meat. But "trophy hunting" is beyond my understanding. I never want to kill anything, not even when I'm hungry.


hunter

(38,311 posts)
6. Ask my parents.
Mon Sep 2, 2013, 09:18 PM
Sep 2013

Okay, I do know, it's a wild west family surname turned into a first name.

The guy I'm named after wasn't really a hunter either. He was a U.S. government surveyor. I'm sure he ate plenty of wild things, but it wasn't his occupation or recreation.

I will hunt or fish if someone is really hungry. I know how to cut up a fish or chicken for dinner. And I confess to having a liking for mackerel and mussels fresh out of the ocean.

Other than that I mostly eat plants, fermented plants, a bit of cheese, and mushrooms.

Maybe I witnessed too much of my parents, grandparents, and great grandparents cutting up dead animals I'd seen alive for dinner.

One of my great grandmas was a very scary woman when she was holding a knife.


Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Michigan Wolf Hunt Based ...