program designed to help prepare for droughts

[xchrom]

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_DROUGHT_PLAN?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2013-11-15-05-46-47


This image provided by NOAA shows the U.S. Drought Monitor graphic on the U.S. Drought Portal Thursday Nov. 14, 2013. The U.S. Department of Agriculture and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration will lead the initiative to provide better and more accessible information about matters such as long-term weather prospects and soil moisture levels under a program designed to help communities prepare for future droughts and respond more effectively when they happen, Obama administration officials said Thursday. (AP Photo/NOAA)

TRAVERSE CITY, Mich. (AP) -- Federal agencies will provide better and more accessible information about matters such as long-term weather prospects and soil moisture levels under a program designed to help communities prepare for future droughts and respond more effectively when they happen, Obama administration officials said Thursday.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration will lead the initiative, which grew out of a series of regional forums held in response to the 2012 drought, the most severe and widespread in more than 70 years. It covered more than two-thirds of the continental U.S. and caused more than $30 billion in losses from crop failures, wildfires and other ripple effects.

"We were very aggressive in responding to the drought but all of it was after the fact," Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack said in an interview with The Associated Press. "We made money available for technical assistance after the fact. We provided disaster loan assistance and extended grazing aid after the fact. We purchased surplus product after the fact."

With droughts likely to become more frequent and widespread as the climate warms, "we have to adjust to this new normal and we have to understand what it means to be proactive instead of just reacting," he said.

[BlueToTheBone]

1. If there's no color, does that mean

that that area is "normal"?