Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,900 posts)
Wed Dec 4, 2013, 02:12 PM Dec 2013

ALEC calls for penalties on 'freerider' homeowners in assault on clean energy

Source: The Guardian

ALEC calls for penalties on 'freerider' homeowners in assault on clean energy

Suzanne Goldenberg in Washington and Ed Pilkington in New York
theguardian.com, Wednesday 4 December 2013 17.49 GMT

An alliance of corporations and conservative activists is mobilising to penalise homeowners who install their own solar panels – casting them as "freeriders" – in a sweeping new offensive against renewable energy, the Guardian has learned.

Over the coming year, the American Legislative Exchange Council (Alec) will promote legislation with goals ranging from penalising individual homeowners and weakening state clean energy regulations, to blocking the Environmental Protection Agency, which is Barack Obama's main channel for climate action.

Details of Alec's strategy to block clean energy development at every stage – from the individual rooftop to the White House – are revealed as the group gathers for its policy summit in Washington this week.

About 800 state legislators and business leaders are due to attend the three-day event, which begins on Wednesday with appearances by the Wisconsin senator Ron Johnson and the Republican budget guru and fellow Wisconsinite Paul Ryan.

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]

Read more: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/dec/04/alec-freerider-homeowners-assault-clean-energy

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
1. As expected - those who are big polluters and rake in the profits are not going down
Wed Dec 4, 2013, 02:28 PM
Dec 2013

without a fight. If they had been invested in buggy whips and saddles, they would have been against cars.
I wouldn't be surprised to see that nuclear reactors are "patriotic", and be given reasons why emissions are GOOD for us.
So - much of the world is going green, and some Americans want to make using solar panels a thing to be penalized for.
I think we are Number One in greedy unregulated harmful to the Earth bullshit.

 

quadrature

(2,049 posts)
3. why should freeriders get a better deal than other cogens?
Wed Dec 4, 2013, 02:46 PM
Dec 2013

is there some reason that
home owners can't form a co-op
and sign a contract like
other adults?

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
4. I pay TECO a $15 a month for a Basic Service Charge - whether I use electricity or not.
Wed Dec 4, 2013, 04:09 PM
Dec 2013

" A fixed monthly amount to cover the cost of providing service to your location."
How, exactly, am I a freeloader if I generate my own power, sell excess power back to Teco like any other entity they buy power from, or use electricity from the grid - which I would pay for!!! - when necessary?

If anything, this may hasten the move to develop better battery storage. Then, presumably, ALEC will seek to have utility companies be the only ones who sell solar panels and batteries, in order to keep prices high.

Solar energy is a "disruptive technology" - time to deal with it, not fight it for the profits of a few.

 

quadrature

(2,049 posts)
8. the value of electricity to the grid varies by the hour.
Wed Dec 4, 2013, 10:37 PM
Dec 2013

I am all in favor of small-producers getting
paid the avoided-cost, of their electricity they
put into the grid.

what do you think?

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
13. I think paying small producers (I assume you mean solar energy producing homeowners) is not what
Wed Dec 4, 2013, 11:01 PM
Dec 2013

really worries the people who fund ALEC. It is the loss of revenue from providing electricity from the grid. It is the loss of revenue to the oil and gas industries. They will fight to keep that level of profit the same and greater, even as demand for oil and gas-produced electricity lessens. Bigger charges for being connected, charges for just having solar at all, slapping fees on the sale of panels, things like that.
In addition, the nukes and oil and gas people will fight to the end to keep generating profit and poisoning the air. This is what unregulated capitalism is all about - just the money.

You think power companies are going to let go of the money they collect from customers for just THINKING about building a nuclear plant? Oh hell no, they won't. They will just flood Washington with lobbyists extolling the virtues of atomic energy, distributing wads of money and threats or primaries as they go. They will post on places like DU about how wrong we are to not want a cute 'lil reactor in every subdivision and farm. They will use things like the TPP to take away any local power to refuse fracking. A war on many fronts.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
10. ALEC is after the solar panels; if just insulating lowers profits, easy to just raise rates.
Wed Dec 4, 2013, 10:50 PM
Dec 2013

Basically, they do not want people generating their own electricity from the sun. They cannot block the sun, so they are going after the panels, the hookups to the grid, and the existing payments to those who sell electricity back to the power company.

I don't know what it will take to fight against this. I do hope that Alec's threat to solar panels gives rise to a greater effort to make better batteries for storage, cheaper panels, and also perhaps create local groups who form a co-op and share electricity off the grid.
Alternative energy is disruptive to the current system of generating energy. There will be a struggle to maintain the current level of profit from using oil and gas and nuclear reactors. Was hoping it would be fairly bloodless, but evidently not.

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
12. Yep.
Wed Dec 4, 2013, 10:56 PM
Dec 2013

I agree with you - the ultimate outcome will be affordable solar based systems allowing us to go off grid.

silverweb

(16,402 posts)
6. Because... because...
Wed Dec 4, 2013, 05:02 PM
Dec 2013

[font color="navy" face="Verdana"]Because your life and your entire income must be committed to corporate profits, you serfs!

Every little solar device you use instead of plugging into the grid helps.
Any future means of circumventing the grid helps.

Besides saving the habitability of the planet, do you need any other reasons to save energy and minimize grid usage?

red dog 1

(27,820 posts)
14. Will there be protests outside ALEC's "policy summit" in Washington?
Thu Dec 5, 2013, 09:29 PM
Dec 2013

If not, why not?

These people are despicable.

ALEC and it's goals are despicable.

The 800 state legislators & business leaders are all despicable.

Penalizing homeowners, weakening state clean energy regulations, blocking the EPA?

Appearing at the conference will be some of the most evil Congressional Repukes, including:
Senators Ted Cruz (R-Texas), Ron Johnson (R-WI)
Republican "budget guru" Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI)
Governors Mike Pence (R-Indiana) and Matt Mead (R-Wyoming)

These bastards are truly evil, in my opinion.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»ALEC calls for penalties ...