Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hatrack

(59,585 posts)
Thu Dec 12, 2013, 10:59 AM Dec 2013

PNAS - For Every Degree F In Global Temperature Increase, 4.2 Feet In Long-Term Sea Level Rise

Measurements tell us that global average sea level is currently rising by about 1 inch per decade. But in an invisible shadow process, our long-term sea level rise commitment or "lock-in" — the sea level rise we don’t see now, but which carbon emissions and warming have locked in for later years — is growing 10 times faster, and this growth rate is accelerating.

An international team of scientists led by Anders Levermann recently published a study that found for every degree Fahrenheit of global warming due to carbon pollution, global average sea level will rise by about 4.2 feet in the long run. When multiplied by the current rate of carbon emissions, and the best estimate of global temperature sensitivity to pollution, this translates to a long-term sea level rise commitment that is now growing at about 1 foot per decade. We have two sea levels: the sea level of today, and the far higher sea level that is already being locked in for some distant tomorrow.

In a new paper published Monday in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), I analyze the growth of the locked-in amount of sea level rise and other implications of Levermann and colleagues’ work. This article and its interactive map are based on this new PNAS paper, and they include extended results.

To begin with, it appears that the amount of carbon pollution to date has already locked in more than 4 feet of sea level rise past today’s levels. That is enough, at high tide, to submerge more than half of today’s population in 316 coastal cities and towns (home to 3.6 million) in the lower 48 states.

EDIT

http://www.climatecentral.org/news/sea-level-rise-locking-in-quickly-cities-threatened-16296

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
PNAS - For Every Degree F In Global Temperature Increase, 4.2 Feet In Long-Term Sea Level Rise (Original Post) hatrack Dec 2013 OP
I calculated that you get about 2ft/deg just from thermal expansion phantom power Dec 2013 #1
That doesn't sound right LouisvilleDem Dec 2013 #3
I should clarify, that was "a uniform 1 degree increase in temp of oceans" phantom power Dec 2013 #4
Deltas are intensively farmed pscot Dec 2013 #2
k & r stuntcat Dec 2013 #5

phantom power

(25,966 posts)
1. I calculated that you get about 2ft/deg just from thermal expansion
Thu Dec 12, 2013, 11:07 AM
Dec 2013

totally ignoring any rise from ice melt

LouisvilleDem

(303 posts)
3. That doesn't sound right
Thu Dec 12, 2013, 04:45 PM
Dec 2013

We've already had nearly 1 degree of warming over the last 100 years, but we haven't seen anything close to a 2 foot rise in sea levels over that period.

How did you come up with the 2ft/deg number?

phantom power

(25,966 posts)
4. I should clarify, that was "a uniform 1 degree increase in temp of oceans"
Thu Dec 12, 2013, 05:54 PM
Dec 2013

The oceans temps haven't increased nearly as much as the atmosphere (and certainly not uniformly).

I did it by looking up the coefficient of thermal expansion for water, applying the expansion for +1C to the volume of the oceans, and then dividing by surface area.

pscot

(21,024 posts)
2. Deltas are intensively farmed
Thu Dec 12, 2013, 01:37 PM
Dec 2013

and highly vulnerable to sea level rise. The UN Food and Agricultural Organization notes:

According to Nicholls and Leatherman (1995), a 1m sea-level rise would affect 6 million people in Egypt, with 12% to 15% of agricultural land lost, 13 million in Bangladesh, with 16% of national rice production lost, and 72 million in China and "tens of thousands" of hectares of agricultural land.

http://www.fao.org/nr/climpag/pub/eire0047_en.asp

Fortunately 6 billion people could live in Texas. I know it's true because I read it on the internet.
No worries, eh?

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»PNAS - For Every Degree F...