Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hatrack

(59,584 posts)
Mon Feb 17, 2014, 09:29 AM Feb 2014

Less Than 1% Of Total Capacity Of 14 LA-Area Reservoirs Available For Release

Late winter in year three of an extended drought and the local picture isn’t pretty.

Urban hillsides retain a summer pallor. Eucalyptus trees are turning brown. Rings around Southern California reservoirs are signs of a water supply that’s dropping fast. Prized underground aquifers — though not visible — are shrinking from overpumping and approaching record lows. And once again, there’s no rain in the forecast.

Less than 1 percent of the capacity of the 14 dams spread across Los Angeles County is available for release, according to data from the Department of Public Works. Of the 183,000 acre-feet possible, the county has about 759 acre-feet it can release to replenish sinking aquifers — a 22-year low. (One acre foot of water is enough to supply two families in Southern California for a year.)

Seven of those reservoirs are bone dry, and one, Santa Anita Dam, is barely holding on to a green pool of shallow water. The big six: San Gabriel, Morris, Puddingstone, Cogswell, Big Tujunga and Pacoima maintain minimum volumes so as not to damage pipes and valves, said Kerjon Lee, spokesman for the county department.

EDIT

http://www.sgvtribune.com/general-news/20140215/14-reservoirs-in-southern-california-near-record-lows

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Less Than 1% Of Total Capacity Of 14 LA-Area Reservoirs Available For Release (Original Post) hatrack Feb 2014 OP
I've been wondering which major metropolitan area will have to evacuate first phantom power Feb 2014 #1
why wasn't federal-water-law fixed in 2009, when the votes... quadrature Feb 2014 #2
Because lots of rich people didn't want it to change NickB79 Feb 2014 #3
seawater to fresh, costs how much? ..nt quadrature Feb 2014 #4

phantom power

(25,966 posts)
1. I've been wondering which major metropolitan area will have to evacuate first
Mon Feb 17, 2014, 12:15 PM
Feb 2014

Somewhere in the southwest still the best bet.

NickB79

(19,236 posts)
3. Because lots of rich people didn't want it to change
Mon Feb 17, 2014, 01:06 PM
Feb 2014

And for all President Obama has talked about "addressing" climate change and it's long-term effects, he's shown very little appetite for actually tackling it head-on.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Less Than 1% Of Total Cap...