Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jakeXT

(10,575 posts)
Sun Jul 13, 2014, 06:46 AM Jul 2014

Gas Export Terminal Draws Opposition From Marylanders, Faith Groups

The shale gas boom in the U.S. has used unconventional drilling practices like fracking to lower natural gas prices, to increase supply, and to soon transform America into a net gas exporter. This last development has elicited a huge controversy, and ground zero could be the small town of Lusby on Maryland’s Chesapeake Bay.

That’s the home of a proposed liquefied natural gas (LNG) export terminal called Cove Point. Dominion Energy has received conditional approval to convert the site’s existing import facility into an export terminal from the Department of Energy, FERC, and a key state regulatory body. But local opposition to the proposed project is mounting.

On Sunday, July 13, there will be a rally on the Mall in Washington, D.C., organized by a host of green groups, billed as the “first national rally to stop fracked gas exports at Cove Point.” They want FERC to decide not to give the project final approval. Mike Tidwell, director of the Chesapeake Climate Action Network, said in May that the risk of a fire or explosion at the facility to nearby houses was too great: “if anything goes off site … homes are going to be incinerated. They’re just too close.”

A report commissioned by nearby residents and Tidwell’s group highlights the risks posed by the plant to homes within 0.8 miles from its borders. Though the LNG industry has a very safe track record, the consequences of an accident at an LNG facility would be dire. A 2004 Energy Department study suggested that a catastrophic leak and ignition at an LNG plant would cause a fireball hot enough to melt steel at 1,200 feet and give second-degree burns a mile away.

http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2014/07/12/3459556/opposition-gas-exports-maryland/

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Gas Export Terminal Draws Opposition From Marylanders, Faith Groups (Original Post) jakeXT Jul 2014 OP
Then, does the same not apply to the import plant Ghost Dog Jul 2014 #1
 

Ghost Dog

(16,881 posts)
1. Then, does the same not apply to the import plant
Sun Jul 13, 2014, 08:14 AM
Jul 2014

that's there at the moment?

On a global scale, if we're going to use, for a while as renewables take over, natural gas it should definitely not come from water-thirsty and otherwise damaging hydraulic fracturing; there are plenty of natural gas fields in the world, and at many existing fossil fuel sites natural gas is allowed to escape or is burned off. Also, the methane currently and increasingly outgassing in the Arctic is essentially natural gas. If only this could be somehow trapped and sequestered or consumed, it would lower greenhouse gas levels in the atmosphere.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Gas Export Terminal Draws...