Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumRising global temperatures will have little effect on boreal peatlands
Last edited Wed Jun 10, 2015, 11:11 AM - Edit history (1)
https://www.sc.edu/uofsc/newsreleases/2015/06_peatlands_global_warming.php[font face=Serif][font size=5]Rising global temperatures will have little effect on boreal peatlands[/font]
Posted on: 6/8/2015; Updated on: 6/8/2015
By Jeff Stensland, 803-777-3686
[font size=3]To some scientists studying climate change, boreal peatlands are considered a potential ticking time bomb. With huge stores of carbon in peat, the fear is that rising global temperatures could cause the release of massive amounts of CO2 from the peatlands into the atmosphereessentially creating a greenhouse gas feedback loop.
A new study by researchers at the University of South Carolina and University of California Los Angeles challenges that notion, and demonstrates that the effect of temperature increases on peat storage could be minor. Funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF) and published in Global Biogeochemical Cycles, the study instead points to the length of time peat is exposed to oxygen as a much more important factor in how it releases carbon into the atmosphere.
The low apparent sensitivity of peat decomposition to warming has important implications for the future of the peatlands, as warming is unlikely to result in widespread carbon loss. Instead, the lengthening growing season is expected to stimulate plant growth, which combined with unchanging decomposition could increase the rate of carbon sequestration.
It is too early to declare peatlands and their massive carbon stocks are secure. Changing precipitation patterns could cause drier conditions, increasing oxygen exposure time and promoting decomposition, Benner said. Thawing permafrost in arctic peatlands could also trigger the loss of previously inaccessible carbon. In addition, increasing atmospheric nitrogen pollution can allow rapidly decomposing vascular plants to outcompete the more recalcitrant Sphagnum (peat moss). However, the results of the study indicate the direct effect of increasing temperatures on decomposition will be relatively minor. [/font][/font]
Posted on: 6/8/2015; Updated on: 6/8/2015
By Jeff Stensland, 803-777-3686
[font size=3]To some scientists studying climate change, boreal peatlands are considered a potential ticking time bomb. With huge stores of carbon in peat, the fear is that rising global temperatures could cause the release of massive amounts of CO2 from the peatlands into the atmosphereessentially creating a greenhouse gas feedback loop.
A new study by researchers at the University of South Carolina and University of California Los Angeles challenges that notion, and demonstrates that the effect of temperature increases on peat storage could be minor. Funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF) and published in Global Biogeochemical Cycles, the study instead points to the length of time peat is exposed to oxygen as a much more important factor in how it releases carbon into the atmosphere.
The low apparent sensitivity of peat decomposition to warming has important implications for the future of the peatlands, as warming is unlikely to result in widespread carbon loss. Instead, the lengthening growing season is expected to stimulate plant growth, which combined with unchanging decomposition could increase the rate of carbon sequestration.
It is too early to declare peatlands and their massive carbon stocks are secure. Changing precipitation patterns could cause drier conditions, increasing oxygen exposure time and promoting decomposition, Benner said. Thawing permafrost in arctic peatlands could also trigger the loss of previously inaccessible carbon. In addition, increasing atmospheric nitrogen pollution can allow rapidly decomposing vascular plants to outcompete the more recalcitrant Sphagnum (peat moss). However, the results of the study indicate the direct effect of increasing temperatures on decomposition will be relatively minor. [/font][/font]
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 514 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rising global temperatures will have little effect on boreal peatlands (Original Post)
OKIsItJustMe
Jun 2015
OP
NickB79
(19,265 posts)1. Until they start on fire and burn like coal mine fires
Like we're already seeing with tundra fires: http://time.com/3913774/tundra-wildfires-southwest-alaska/
http://www.news.illinois.edu/news/10/1117tundra-fires.html
As Arctic temperatures rise, tundra fires increase, researchers find
BTW, does this paragraph strike anyone else as an almost word-for-word quote for what GW deniers tried to say about the effects of climate change on cropland?
The low apparent sensitivity of peat decomposition to warming has important implications for the future of the peatlands, as warming is unlikely to result in widespread carbon loss. Instead, the lengthening growing season is expected to stimulate plant growth, which combined with unchanging decomposition could increase the rate of carbon sequestration.
Until the droughts set in, that is.....