Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
Fri Jul 17, 2015, 09:31 AM Jul 2015

Red wolf debacle shows US Fish and Wildlife Service missing spine


BY RON SUTHERLAND

The meme spreading around social media this week of President Barack Obama defiantly standing on a doorstep while holding a bald eagle is pretty awesome, but for those of us in the wildlife conservation world, it is also rather ironic, given the way the Obama administration has been retreating from endangered species conservation in recent years.

Not only has it backpedaled sharply away from protecting any form of gray wolf, it also has put forth what many conservation biologists see as an obscene interpretation of the Endangered Species Act, claiming that a species needs to be restored only to some fraction of its historic range in order to qualify as recovered. Under this interpretation, neither bald eagles nor gray wolves would ever have been the focus of conservation efforts in the lower 48 states, since both species were secure in Alaska.

Now the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is busy working hard to make sure the red wolf program in North Carolina goes away, too, even though the wild red wolf population has dwindled to below 100 animals (compare that with 1,600 wild giant pandas and 4,500 wild snow leopards). After commissioning a 171-page program review from the Wildlife Management Institute last year, this week the agency announced its decision to dial down the red wolf reintroduction effort until yet another review can be conducted. The agency also quietly eliminated the position of the red wolf recovery coordinator. All the signs point toward a U.S. FWS that lacks the guts or the enthusiasm to fight any more for the sake of controversial species.

Yet the fact is that North Carolina residents and Americans generally support conserving wolves and other endangered animals, an inconvenient truth that the U.S. FWS seems to be actively trying to suppress. As part of the WMI review, the agency solicited public comments last fall. Over 120,000 pro-red-wolf comments were submitted, as counted by a number of prominent wildlife conservation nonprofits. But the U.S. FWS acknowledged that it “lost” a substantial number of these emails, and WMI reported only 43,000 comments received (and it still didn’t admit how many of those comments supported the wolf program). This fiasco happened after it came to light that the person WMI hired to conduct the review had been forced to resign the same year from the Kentucky Department of Natural Resources for major ethical violations.

Read more here: http://www.newsobserver.com/opinion/op-ed/article26995669.html#storylink=cpy
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Red wolf debacle shows US Fish and Wildlife Service missing spine (Original Post) n2doc Jul 2015 OP
A new mascot just us Jul 2015 #1

just us

(105 posts)
1. A new mascot
Fri Jul 17, 2015, 10:31 AM
Jul 2015

I have been pushing the idea of the Red Wolf becoming the new mascot for the Washington NFL team.
A major campaign for it becoming their symbol would give a voice to the species and cause with merit for the fans of the team. It maybe the only reprieve left.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Red wolf debacle shows US...