Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sue4e3

(731 posts)
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 09:37 PM Feb 2016

Anthropocene Examined

Boulder, Colorado, USA: In the March-April issue of GSA Today, Stanley Finney (California State University at Long Beach) and Lucy Edwards (U.S. Geological Survey) tackle the hot topic of whether to define a new "Anthropocene" epoch as a formal unit of the geologic time scale. The term "Anthropocene" has receive significant coverage in both the geoscience and popular press, but little of that coverage has focused on how units of the International Chronostratigraphic Chart (the basis for the geologic time scale) are defined.


Golden spike emplaced in bed that is Global Standard Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) for the Thenetian Stage. Length of "rock hammer": 5 cm. Credit:
Finney and Edwards use this opportunity to explain to the general geoscience audience the criteria for stratigraphic units within the International Stratigraphic Guide, and how decisions are made to define new units or change existing units.

As such, this informative article provides general geologic information that goes beyond the hot topic itself. In the article's conclusion, the authors do not pronounce judgment on whether a new Anthropocene epoch should be created, but rather encourage the geologic community to educate themselves on how stratigraphic units are defined and then contribute to the ongoing discussion.

http://www.sciencenewsline.com/news/2016022923170014.html

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Anthropocene Examined (Original Post) sue4e3 Feb 2016 OP
Anthropocene is valid, in my opinion. cheapdate Feb 2016 #1
I agree sue4e3 Feb 2016 #2
Link to the Working Group's web page: muriel_volestrangler Mar 2016 #3

cheapdate

(3,811 posts)
1. Anthropocene is valid, in my opinion.
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 10:18 PM
Feb 2016

We've moved major rivers, flattened mountains, changed coastlines, dug mining pits a mile deep, transformed the earth's surface with concrete and asphalt, changed the chemistry and circulation of the ocean, altered the earth's biota -- creating new species while causing other to go extinct, changed the composition of the atmosphere, altered the earth's radiative balance, and changed the climate. It's very possible that we'll be affecting the geology of extraterrestrial bodies in the near future.

It's legitimately, geologically significant. I have no doubt.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Anthropocene Examined