Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumThe Blazing Idiocy Of Florida Coastal Developers - And Those Who Buy Their Properties
EDIT
n Miami, a city perilously perched atop a very porous limestone, two multibillion-dollar construction projects are under way, despite the fact that parts of the city routinely flood during high tides and that widespread flooding by the rising sea in a few decades is a virtual certainty. No sea walls, levees or dikes can stop the rising waters from flowing through the underlying spongy limestone and into the city. Miami is ultimately doomed.
A few miles to the north, Fort Lauderdale is undergoing equally intense development and population growth. This city has more beachfront high-rise buildings per mile than any other American beach. According to Katherine Bagley of Inside Climate news nearly 5,000 apartments or condos are or soon will be under construction in the city, which already faces routine nuisance flooding. The citys many canals make Fort Lauderdale all the more vulnerable to rising seas. In light of the wet future in store for the city, increased density is insane.
On the other side of the Florida peninsula along the Gulf of Mexico, a Fort Myers Beach developer proposes to build a massive project to include four beachfront hotels, nine restaurants and a 1,500-car parking structure; all to be protected with a soon-to-be-constructed half-mile-long seawall. If you need to build a seawall to protect your construction project, you should not be building at that site. Remember seawalls destroy beaches. Two barrier island communities deserve attention as the nations most vulnerable to sea level. On the east coast, North Topsail Beach in North Carolina is a narrow, low, rapidly-eroding island segment. In spite of the obvious natural dangers, the town has several immovable high-rises, at least one of which may soon fall in. On the Gulf coast, Dauphin Island, Alabama is an extremely low island that is frequently overwashed by storms, and repeated beach nourishment has done almost nothing to stop erosion.
EDIT
They have taken measures to make these structures more resilient, but in this age of certain sea-level rise, it is preposterous to continue to build in areas that were previously inundated by floodwaters and will certainly be inundated in the future. The time has passed for such foolish projects. The frequency of super costly natural disasters on the coast will only increase if we continue to cram buildings up against the beach and treat storms as urban renewal projects. It is time for a profound new outlook where we construct smaller, less expensive and perhaps mobile structures and do not replace buildings destroyed and damaged in storms. It is time we prepare to retreat from the rising sea.
EDIT/END
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/mar/14/developers-dont-get-it-climate-change-need-retreat-coast
RKP5637
(67,066 posts)see short term $$$$$$'s. They aren't in it for the long haul. Build, collect money, and the get the hell out. It should be stopped, but often too many with power and influence are also on the $$$$$$'s take.
patricia92243
(12,591 posts)case it will be short term greed - but it still wins.
progressoid
(49,879 posts)Talking about Miami Beach though.
phantom power
(25,966 posts)hunter
(38,285 posts)... hey, it works in Antarctica for snow and slowly moving ice.
https://www.bas.ac.uk/polar-operations/sites-and-facilities/facility/halley/
(I'll hide, in case someone takes that as a serious proposal...)
Nihil
(13,508 posts)The developers are very "smart" in that they will get their money - both from
the gullible morons who buy the properties and the state/government who
pay subsidies & "assistance" - but be well out of the way when TSHTF.
The developers are immoral, greedy & disgustingly exploitative but not idiots.
The buyers however should all be provided with a free "I'm a complete
fucking idiot" tattoo for their foreheads to avoid any well-meaning person
wasting time, money or sympathy on them when they get wet.